Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, 711 Concession St, Hamilton, ON L8V 1C3, Canada.
Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Toronto, ON, Canada.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Apr;216(4):935-942. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23031. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of LI-RADS ancillary features on MRI and to ascertain whether the number of ancillary features can be reduced without compromising LI-RADS accuracy. A total of 222 liver observations in 81 consecutive patients were identified on MRI between August 2013 and December 2018. The presence or absence of major and ancillary features was used to determine the LI-RADS category for LR-1 to LR-5 observations. Final diagnosis was established on the basis of pathologic findings or one of several composite clinical reference standards. Diagnostic accuracy was compared with and without ancillary features by use of the test of proportions. Decision tree analysis and machine learning-based feature pruning were used to identify noncontributory ancillary features for LI-RADS categorization. Interobserver agreement with and without ancillary features was measured using the Krippendorff alpha coefficient, and comparisons were made using bootstrapping. A < .05 was considered statistically significant. Application of ancillary features resulted in a change in the LI-RADS category of seven hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), with the category of six of seven (86%) HCCs upgraded; 51 benign observations also had a change in LI-RADS category, with the category of 33 (65%) of these observations downgraded. When ancillary features were applied, the percentage of HCCs in each LI-RADS category did not differ significantly compared with major features alone ( = .06-.49). Decision tree analysis and the machine learning model identified five ancillary features as noncontributory: corona enhancement, nodule-in-nodule, mosaic architecture, blood products in mass, and fat in a mass, more than in adjacent liver. Interobserver agreement was high with and without application of ancillary features; however, it was significantly higher without ancillary features ( < .001). Although ancillary features are an important component of LI-RADS, their impact may be small. Several ancillary features likely can be removed from LI-RADS without compromising diagnostic performance.
本研究旨在确定 LI-RADS 辅助特征对 MRI 的影响,并确定在不影响 LI-RADS 准确性的情况下是否可以减少辅助特征的数量。在 2013 年 8 月至 2018 年 12 月期间,共在 81 例连续患者的 MRI 上识别出 222 个肝脏观察结果。使用主要特征和辅助特征的存在与否来确定 LR-1 至 LR-5 观察结果的 LI-RADS 类别。最终诊断基于病理发现或几种综合临床参考标准之一。使用 检验比较有无辅助特征的诊断准确性。决策树分析和基于机器学习的特征修剪用于识别对 LI-RADS 分类无贡献的辅助特征。使用 Krippendorff alpha 系数测量有无辅助特征的观察者间一致性,并使用自举进行比较。 <.05 被认为具有统计学意义。应用辅助特征导致 7 个肝细胞癌(HCC)的 LI-RADS 类别发生变化,其中 7 个 HCC 中的 6 个(86%)类别升级;51 个良性观察结果的 LI-RADS 类别也发生了变化,其中 33 个(65%)观察结果的类别降级。当应用辅助特征时,LI-RADS 各类别中的 HCC 百分比与仅应用主要特征时没有显著差异( =.06-.49)。决策树分析和机器学习模型确定了 5 个非贡献性辅助特征:晕环增强、结节内结节、马赛克结构、肿块内血液产物和肿块内脂肪,这些特征比相邻肝脏中更多。应用和不应用辅助特征时观察者间一致性均较高;然而,不应用辅助特征时,一致性显著更高( <.001)。虽然辅助特征是 LI-RADS 的重要组成部分,但它们的影响可能较小。在不影响诊断性能的情况下,LI-RADS 可能可以去除几个辅助特征。