Suppr超能文献

入门级物理治疗课程中的颅骶疗法和肌筋膜放松疗法

Craniosacral therapy and myofascial release in entry-level physical therapy curricula.

作者信息

Ehrett S L

机构信息

University of Indianapolis.

出版信息

Phys Ther. 1988 Apr;68(4):534-40. doi: 10.1093/ptj/68.4.534.

Abstract

The purposes of this study were 1) to discover the extent to which craniosacral therapy (CST) and myofascial release (MFR) instruction are included in entry-level physical therapy curricula; 2) to determine the amount of faculty and program director interest in such instruction; and 3) to determine what educational materials, if any, are desired. A one-page questionnaire was distributed to the program directors of 109 accredited entry-level physical therapy programs in the United States. Of the 95 respondents, 1 (1%) included a unit on CST only, 14 (15%) included a unit on MFR only, 14 (15%) included units on both CST and MFR, and 66 (69%) included neither. The highest percentages of programs with CST and MFR units were entry-level masters' degree programs and programs located in the Pacific Coast and Middle Atlantic regions. All of the units were presented within required courses, usually during the second year; most were taught by physical therapists. The greatest amount of instructional time was allotted for CST laboratory sessions (mean = 5.8 hours), and the least amount of time was allotted for MFR lectures (mean = 1.7 hours). The mos frequently cited reason for noninclusion of CST or MFR instruction was inadequate room in the current curricula. The most frequently requested materials were bibliographies and laboratory guides on CST and MFR. Implications of these findings are addressed, and suggestions for further research are given.

摘要

本研究的目的包括

1)了解入门级物理治疗课程中包含颅骶疗法(CST)和肌筋膜放松(MFR)教学内容的程度;2)确定教师和项目主任对这类教学的兴趣程度;3)确定是否需要以及需要哪些教育材料。向美国109个经认可的入门级物理治疗项目的项目主任发放了一份单页问卷。在95名受访者中,1人(1%)仅包含一个关于CST的单元,14人(15%)仅包含一个关于MFR的单元,14人(15%)同时包含CST和MFR的单元,66人(69%)两者都未包含。设有CST和MFR单元的项目中,比例最高的是入门级硕士学位项目以及位于太平洋海岸和大西洋中部地区的项目。所有单元均在必修课程中讲授,通常在第二年;大多数由物理治疗师授课。分配给CST实验室课程的教学时间最多(平均 = 5.8小时),分配给MFR讲座的时间最少(平均 = 1.7小时)。不纳入CST或MFR教学内容最常被提及的原因是当前课程中空间不足。最常被要求的材料是关于CST和MFR的参考书目和实验室指南。讨论了这些研究结果的意义,并给出了进一步研究的建议。

相似文献

2
Survey of burn education in entry-level physical therapy programs.
Phys Ther. 1988 Apr;68(4):530-3. doi: 10.1093/ptj/68.4.530.
3
Joint manipulation curricula in physical therapist professional degree programs.物理治疗师专业学位课程中的关节松动术教程
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004 Apr;34(4):171-8; discussion 179-81. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2004.34.4.171.
4
Obstetrics in the physical therapy curriculum.物理治疗课程中的产科学
Phys Ther. 1985 Jan;65(1):51-3. doi: 10.1093/ptj/65.1.51.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验