• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过公共图书馆合作开发提高服务不足人群研究素养的网络工具。

Development of a web tool to increase research literacy in underserved populations through public library partnerships.

机构信息

Center for Health Equity Transformation and Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

Galter Health Sciences Library & Learning Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Feb 3;16(2):e0246098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246098. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0246098
PMID:33534794
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7857632/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Inadequate diversity in clinical trials is widely recognized as a significant contributing factor to health disparities experienced by racial/ethnic minorities and other diverse populations in the US. To address this in a scalable way, we sought to develop a web tool that could help enhance underserved minority participation in clinical research.

METHODS

We used our research literacy support flashcard tool as the initial prototype for human-centered design and usability testing of the web tool Health for All in public library settings. After forming partnerships with leadership from Chicago Public Libraries (CPL), local medical libraries, and the Chicago Department of Public Health, we conducted seven iterative design sessions with focus groups of library patrons and library staff from six CPL branches serving underserved communities followed by two rounds of usability testing and website modification.

RESULTS

Based on the qualitative research findings from Design Sessions 1-7, we enacted the design decision of a website that was a hybrid of fact-filled and vignette (personal stories) paper prototypes divided into 4 modules (trust, diversity, healthy volunteers, pros/cons), each with their own outcome metrics. The website was thus constructed, and navigation issues identified in two rounds of usability testing by library patrons were addressed through further website modification, followed by the launch of a beta version of a hybridized single-scrolling and guided module prototype to allow further development with website analytics.

CONCLUSIONS

We report the development of Health for All, a website designed to enhance racial/ethnic minority participation in clinical trials by imparting research literacy, mitigating distrust engendered by longstanding racism and discrimination, and providing connections to clinical trials recruiting participants.

摘要

目的

临床试验中存在的多样性不足是导致美国少数族裔和其他多样化人群在健康方面存在差异的一个重要因素。为了以一种可扩展的方式解决这个问题,我们试图开发一种网络工具,以帮助增加服务不足的少数族裔参与临床研究。

方法

我们使用我们的研究文献支持抽认卡工具作为初始原型,进行以人为中心的设计和网络工具健康为全所有人在公共图书馆环境中的可用性测试。在与芝加哥公共图书馆(CPL)、当地医学图书馆和芝加哥公共卫生部门的领导层建立合作关系后,我们对来自六个为服务不足社区服务的 CPL 分支机构的图书馆顾客和图书馆工作人员进行了七次迭代设计会议,随后进行了两轮可用性测试和网站修改。

结果

基于设计会议 1-7 的定性研究结果,我们采取了一种网站设计决策,该网站是充满事实和情景(个人故事)纸质原型的混合体,分为 4 个模块(信任、多样性、健康志愿者、利弊),每个模块都有自己的结果指标。因此,该网站得以构建,并且图书馆顾客在两轮可用性测试中发现的导航问题通过进一步的网站修改得到解决,随后推出了混合式单滚动和引导模块原型的测试版,以便通过网站分析进一步开发。

结论

我们报告了 Health for All 的开发,这是一个旨在通过传授研究素养、减轻长期种族主义和歧视所产生的不信任以及提供参与临床试验招募参与者的联系来增强少数族裔参与临床试验的网站。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8677/7857632/6b87e18577dd/pone.0246098.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8677/7857632/b5d63f18378b/pone.0246098.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8677/7857632/577dabdade2b/pone.0246098.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8677/7857632/45da9a9ebf17/pone.0246098.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8677/7857632/ad6e1bd0a845/pone.0246098.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8677/7857632/6b87e18577dd/pone.0246098.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8677/7857632/b5d63f18378b/pone.0246098.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8677/7857632/577dabdade2b/pone.0246098.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8677/7857632/45da9a9ebf17/pone.0246098.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8677/7857632/ad6e1bd0a845/pone.0246098.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8677/7857632/6b87e18577dd/pone.0246098.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a web tool to increase research literacy in underserved populations through public library partnerships.通过公共图书馆合作开发提高服务不足人群研究素养的网络工具。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 3;16(2):e0246098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246098. eCollection 2021.
2
Development of a Plain Language Decision Support Tool for Cancer Clinical Trials: Blending Health Literacy, Academic Research, and Minority Patient Perspectives.开发用于癌症临床试验的简明决策支持工具:融合健康素养、学术研究和少数族裔患者观点。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Jun;35(3):454-461. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-1482-5.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Improving Research Literacy in Diverse Minority Populations with a Novel Communication Tool.使用新型交流工具提高不同少数群体的研究素养
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Dec;34(6):1120-1129. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1418-5.
5
Addressing racial disparities in perinatal care for African American/Black individuals in the Chicago community health setting: a qualitative study.解决芝加哥社区卫生环境中非洲裔美国人/黑人在围产期护理方面的种族差异:一项定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Oct 13;22(1):771. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05100-4.
6
Libraries and Librarians: Key Partners for Progress in Health Literacy Research and Practice.图书馆与图书馆员:健康素养研究与实践进展的关键伙伴
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;240:415-432.
7
Recruitment of racial and ethnic minorities to clinical trials conducted within specialty clinics: an intervention mapping approach.在专科诊所开展的临床试验中招募种族和少数族裔:一种干预映射方法。
Trials. 2018 Feb 17;19(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2507-9.
8
Reducing Disparities in Cancer Screening and Prevention through Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships with Local Libraries: A Comprehensive Dynamic Trial.通过与当地图书馆建立社区参与式研究伙伴关系来减少癌症筛查和预防方面的差距:一项全面的动态试验。
Am J Community Psychol. 2017 Sep;60(1-2):145-159. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12161. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
9
Why and how six aligning forces for quality communities have focused on reducing disparities.为何以及质量社区的六种协调力量如何专注于减少差异。
Med Care Res Rev. 2014 Oct;71(5):435-49. doi: 10.1177/1077558714533826. Epub 2014 May 11.
10
Advance Care Planning Website for People With Dementia and Their Family Caregivers: Protocol for a Development and Usability Study.面向痴呆症患者及其家庭护理人员的预先护理计划网站:一项开发与可用性研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jul 26;12:e46935. doi: 10.2196/46935.

引用本文的文献

1
Tackling Gynecologic Cancer Disparities: An Assessment of 2 Interventions for Improving Information Exchange With Racial/Ethnic Communities.解决妇科癌症差异问题:评估两种改善与种族/族裔社区信息交流的干预措施。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Mar 1;66(1):43-52. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000742. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
2
Homelessness at the San Diego Central Library: Assessing the Potential Role of Social Workers.圣地亚哥中央图书馆的无家可归问题:评估社会工作者的潜在作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 11;19(14):8449. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148449.

本文引用的文献

1
The Disproportionate Impact of COVID-19 on Racial and Ethnic Minorities in the United States.美国新冠疫情对少数族裔的不成比例影响。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Feb 16;72(4):703-706. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa815.
2
Key methodological considerations for usability testing of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems.电子患者报告结局(ePRO)系统可用性测试的关键方法学考虑因素。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Feb;29(2):325-333. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02329-z. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
3
Creating an mHealth App for Colorectal Cancer Screening: User-Centered Design Approach.
创建一款用于结直肠癌筛查的移动健康应用程序:以用户为中心的设计方法。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2019 May 8;6(2):e12700. doi: 10.2196/12700.
4
The Power of Design Thinking in Medical Education.设计思维在医学教育中的力量。
Acad Radiol. 2019 Oct;26(10):1417-1420. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
5
Development of a Plain Language Decision Support Tool for Cancer Clinical Trials: Blending Health Literacy, Academic Research, and Minority Patient Perspectives.开发用于癌症临床试验的简明决策支持工具:融合健康素养、学术研究和少数族裔患者观点。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Jun;35(3):454-461. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-1482-5.
6
Human-Centered Design of Video-Based Health Education: An Iterative, Collaborative, Community-Based Approach.基于视频的健康教育的以人为本设计:一种迭代、协作、基于社区的方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 30;21(1):e12128. doi: 10.2196/12128.
7
Increasing Diversity in Clinical Trials: Overcoming Critical Barriers.提高临床试验的多样性:克服关键障碍。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2019 May;44(5):148-172. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
8
Chinese Immigrant Women's Attitudes and Beliefs About Family Involvement in Women's Health and Healthcare: A Qualitative Study in Chicago's Chinatown.中国移民女性对家庭参与女性健康与医疗保健的态度和信念:在芝加哥唐人街的一项定性研究
Health Equity. 2018 Aug 1;2(1):182-192. doi: 10.1089/heq.2017.0062. eCollection 2018.
9
Improving Research Literacy in Diverse Minority Populations with a Novel Communication Tool.使用新型交流工具提高不同少数群体的研究素养
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Dec;34(6):1120-1129. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1418-5.
10
Public Libraries: A Community-Level Resource to Advance Population Health.公共图书馆:提升人口健康水平的社区资源。
J Community Health. 2019 Feb;44(1):192-199. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-0547-4.