• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Improving Research Literacy in Diverse Minority Populations with a Novel Communication Tool.使用新型交流工具提高不同少数群体的研究素养
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Dec;34(6):1120-1129. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1418-5.
2
The Development of a Communication Tool to Facilitate the Cancer Trial Recruitment Process and Increase Research Literacy among Underrepresented Populations.一种促进癌症试验招募过程并提高代表性不足人群研究素养的沟通工具的开发。
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Dec;30(4):792-8. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0818-z.
3
Development of a Plain Language Decision Support Tool for Cancer Clinical Trials: Blending Health Literacy, Academic Research, and Minority Patient Perspectives.开发用于癌症临床试验的简明决策支持工具:融合健康素养、学术研究和少数族裔患者观点。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Jun;35(3):454-461. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-1482-5.
4
Underrepresentation of Hispanics and Other Minorities in Clinical Trials: Recruiters' Perspectives.临床试验中西班牙裔和其他少数族裔代表性不足:招募者的观点。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2018 Apr;5(2):322-332. doi: 10.1007/s40615-017-0373-x. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
5
Facilitating the recruitment of minority ethnic people into research: qualitative case study of South Asians and asthma.促进少数族裔人群参与研究:南亚人与哮喘的定性案例研究
PLoS Med. 2009 Oct;6(10):e1000148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000148. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
6
Bias and stereotyping among research and clinical professionals: Perspectives on minority recruitment for oncology clinical trials.研究和临床专业人员中的偏见和刻板印象:肿瘤学临床试验中少数民族招募的观点。
Cancer. 2020 Jan 1;126(9):1958-1968. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32755. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
7
An examination of community members', researchers' and health professionals' perceptions of barriers to minority participation in medical research: an application of concept mapping.对社区成员、研究人员和卫生专业人员关于少数群体参与医学研究的障碍认知的考察:概念图的应用
Ethn Health. 2007 Nov;12(5):521-39. doi: 10.1080/13557850701616987.
8
Barriers and Strategies for Recruitment of Racial and Ethnic Minorities: Perspectives from Neurological Clinical Research Coordinators.招募少数族裔参与神经科临床研究的障碍与策略:临床研究协调员的观点。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2017 Dec;4(6):1225-1236. doi: 10.1007/s40615-016-0332-y. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
9
Commentary: clinician and researcher contributions to disparities in racial and ethnic minority participation in human subjects research.评论:临床医生和研究人员对少数族裔参与人体研究的差异所起的作用。
Ethn Dis. 2014 Summer;24(3):298-301.
10
Racial/Ethnic Differences in Comprehension of Biospecimen Collection: a Nationwide University of Rochester Cancer Center NCI Community Oncology Research Program Study.生物样本采集认知方面的种族/民族差异:罗切斯特大学癌症中心全国性美国国立癌症研究所社区肿瘤学研究项目研究
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Apr;35(2):292-300. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1464-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Sociodemographic Factors on Access to and Outcomes in Congenital Heart Disease in the United States.社会人口因素对美国先天性心脏病就医机会及治疗结果的影响
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Feb 19;11(2):67. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11020067.
2
Consent for Research Involving Spanish- and English-Speaking Latinx Adults With Schizophrenia.西班牙语和英语母语拉丁裔成年人精神分裂症研究的同意书。
Schizophr Bull. 2024 Apr 30;50(3):673-683. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbad159.
3
[DNVF Memorandum Health Literacy (Part 2) - Operationalisation and Measuring of Health Literacy from a Health Services Research Perspective].[糖尿病神经病变基金会备忘录:健康素养(第2部分)——从卫生服务研究角度看健康素养的实施与测量]
Gesundheitswesen. 2022 Apr;84(4):e26-e41. doi: 10.1055/a-1807-0853. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
4
Health Disparities in Recruitment and Enrollment in Research.健康差异在研究招募和参与中。
Thorac Surg Clin. 2022 Feb;32(1):75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2021.09.012.
5
Development of a web tool to increase research literacy in underserved populations through public library partnerships.通过公共图书馆合作开发提高服务不足人群研究素养的网络工具。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 3;16(2):e0246098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246098. eCollection 2021.
6
Co-producing Progression Criteria for Feasibility Studies: A Partnership between Patient Contributors, Clinicians and Researchers.共同制定可行性研究进展标准:患者贡献者、临床医生和研究人员之间的合作。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 6;16(19):3756. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193756.

本文引用的文献

1
"You Need to Be a Good Listener": Recruiters' Use of Relational Communication Behaviors to Enhance Clinical Trial and Research Study Accrual.“你需要成为一个好的倾听者”:招聘人员运用关系沟通行为来提高临床试验和研究招募率。
J Health Commun. 2017 Feb;22(2):95-101. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1256356. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
2
A survey of patient perspectives on the research use of health information and biospecimens.关于患者对健康信息和生物样本研究用途看法的调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Aug 15;17(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0130-4.
3
Views on clinical trial recruitment, biospecimen collection, and cancer research: population science from landscapes of the Haudenosaunee (People of the Longhouse).关于临床试验招募、生物样本采集和癌症研究的观点:来自霍德诺索尼(长屋之民)地区的人口科学。
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Feb;33(1):44-51. doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-1067-5.
4
Clinical Trial and Research Study Recruiters' Verbal Communication Behaviors.临床试验与研究招募人员的言语沟通行为。
J Health Commun. 2016 Jul;21(7):765-72. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1157654. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
5
Patient Navigation As a Model to Increase Participation of African Americans in Cancer Clinical Trials.患者导航:提高非裔美国人参与癌症临床试验的一种模式
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Jun;12(6):556-63. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.008946. Epub 2016 May 17.
6
"I Was Tired of All the Sticking and Poking": Identifying Barriers to Diabetes Self-Care Among Low-Income Pregnant Women.“我厌倦了所有的打针和戳刺”:识别低收入孕妇糖尿病自我护理的障碍
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2015 Aug;26(3):926-40. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2015.0073.
7
The Development of a Communication Tool to Facilitate the Cancer Trial Recruitment Process and Increase Research Literacy among Underrepresented Populations.一种促进癌症试验招募过程并提高代表性不足人群研究素养的沟通工具的开发。
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Dec;30(4):792-8. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0818-z.
8
Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities.改善临床试验受试者招募与留存的干预措施:一项评估当前实践及未来优先事项的调查与研讨会
Trials. 2014 Oct 16;15:399. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-399.
9
How pragmatic is it? Lessons learned using PRECIS and RE-AIM for determining pragmatic characteristics of research.它有多实用?运用PRECIS和RE-AIM确定研究实用特征所获得的经验教训。
Implement Sci. 2014 Aug 28;9:96. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0096-x.
10
Engaging diverse populations about biospecimen donation for cancer research.让不同人群参与癌症研究生物样本捐赠事宜。
J Community Genet. 2014 Oct;5(4):313-27. doi: 10.1007/s12687-014-0186-0. Epub 2014 Mar 25.

使用新型交流工具提高不同少数群体的研究素养

Improving Research Literacy in Diverse Minority Populations with a Novel Communication Tool.

作者信息

Simon Melissa A, Haring Rodney, Rodriguez Elisa M, González Evelyn, Kaur Judith S, Kirschner Marcie, Tom Laura, O'Brian Catherine A, Katz Mira L

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 633 N St Clair, Suite 1800, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.

Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2019 Dec;34(6):1120-1129. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1418-5.

DOI:10.1007/s13187-018-1418-5
PMID:30144005
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6934084/
Abstract

Racial/ethnic minorities are underrepresented in clinical research in the USA for multifarious reasons, including barriers to effective communication between researchers and potential research participants. To address the communication barriers between researchers and potential participants, we developed a Research Literacy Support (RLS) tool. The focus of this report is to present findings from the second and third phases of development that refined and assessed usability of the RLS tool. We utilized a mixed-methods approach that entailed iterative cognitive testing with participants (N = 52) from diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds and interviews with clinical research recruiters (N = 20) to modify and refine the design and content of the RLS tool (phase 2). This was followed by assessment of the usability of the RLS tool by 100 participants (phase 3). During phase 2, participants provided feedback about layout, word choice, and comprehension of the tool. In phase 3, participants recognized that they had gained knowledge about clinical research from the RLS tool, although they still had a substantial learning gap after using the tool, indicating an opportunity for further refinement. The RLS tool may help advance health equity by addressing communication barriers that may impede minority participation in clinical research.

摘要

在美国,由于多种原因,种族/族裔少数群体在临床研究中的代表性不足,这些原因包括研究人员与潜在研究参与者之间有效沟通的障碍。为了解决研究人员与潜在参与者之间的沟通障碍,我们开发了一种研究素养支持(RLS)工具。本报告的重点是展示该RLS工具在开发的第二和第三阶段所取得的成果,这些阶段对该工具进行了完善并评估了其可用性。我们采用了一种混合方法,包括对来自不同种族/族裔背景的参与者(N = 52)进行迭代认知测试,以及对临床研究招募人员(N = 20)进行访谈,以修改和完善RLS工具的设计和内容(第二阶段)。随后,由100名参与者对RLS工具的可用性进行评估(第三阶段)。在第二阶段,参与者对工具的布局、用词和理解提供了反馈。在第三阶段,参与者认识到他们从RLS工具中获得了有关临床研究的知识,尽管在使用该工具后他们仍存在很大的学习差距,这表明有进一步完善的空间。RLS工具可能有助于通过消除可能阻碍少数群体参与临床研究的沟通障碍来促进健康公平。