• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过 DCE-MRI 利用节段性与主动脉动脉输入函数对腰椎灌注进行定量 Tofts 建模。

Quantifying lumbar vertebral perfusion by a Tofts model on DCE-MRI using segmental versus aortic arterial input function.

机构信息

Department of Automatic Control Engineering, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan.

Master's Program of Biomedical Informatics and Biomedical Engineering, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 3;11(1):2920. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82300-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-82300-6
PMID:33536471
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7859214/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of arterial input function (AIF) selection on the quantification of vertebral perfusion using axial dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). In this study, axial DCE-MRI was performed on 2 vertebrae in each of eight healthy volunteers (mean age, 36.9 years; 5 men) using a 1.5-T scanner. The pharmacokinetic parameters K, v, and v, derived using a Tofts model on axial DCE-MRI of the lumbar vertebrae, were evaluated using various AIFs: the population-based aortic AIF (AIF_PA), a patient-specific aortic AIF (AIF_A) and a patient-specific segmental arterial AIF (AIF_SA). Additionally, peaks and delay times were changed to simulate the effects of various AIFs on the calculation of perfusion parameters. Nonparametric analyses including the Wilcoxon signed rank test and the Kruskal-Wallis test with a Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc analysis were performed. In simulation, K and v increased as the peak in the AIF decreased, but v increased when delay time in the AIF increased. In humans, the estimated K and v were significantly smaller using AIF_A compared to AIF_SA no matter the computation style (pixel-wise or region-of-interest based). Both these perfusion parameters were significantly greater using AIF_SA compared to AIF_A.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨在使用轴向动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)定量椎体灌注时,动脉输入函数(AIF)选择对其的影响。在这项研究中,使用 1.5T 扫描仪对 8 名健康志愿者(平均年龄 36.9 岁,5 名男性)的每 2 个椎体进行了轴向 DCE-MRI。使用 Tofts 模型评估了来自腰椎轴向 DCE-MRI 的药代动力学参数 K、v 和 v,采用了多种 AIF:基于人群的主动脉 AIF(AIF_PA)、患者特异性主动脉 AIF(AIF_A)和患者特异性节段性动脉 AIF(AIF_SA)。此外,还改变了峰值和延迟时间,以模拟各种 AIF 对灌注参数计算的影响。进行了非参数分析,包括 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验,以及 Dunn-Bonferroni 事后分析。在模拟中,随着 AIF 峰值的降低,K 和 v 增加,但当 AIF 中的延迟时间增加时,v 增加。在人体中,无论计算方式(像素级或基于感兴趣区域的方式)如何,使用 AIF_A 估计的 K 和 v 明显小于 AIF_SA。与 AIF_A 相比,使用 AIF_SA 时这两个灌注参数均明显更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f9/7859214/e5bf0993df33/41598_2021_82300_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f9/7859214/766482de4693/41598_2021_82300_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f9/7859214/8c20ff5268ba/41598_2021_82300_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f9/7859214/955ed7cc46bb/41598_2021_82300_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f9/7859214/8d1059fa548a/41598_2021_82300_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f9/7859214/70d8bc49e356/41598_2021_82300_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f9/7859214/fc11f6e92318/41598_2021_82300_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f9/7859214/85d971492750/41598_2021_82300_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f9/7859214/9aa220c82e45/41598_2021_82300_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f9/7859214/e5bf0993df33/41598_2021_82300_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f9/7859214/766482de4693/41598_2021_82300_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f9/7859214/8c20ff5268ba/41598_2021_82300_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f9/7859214/955ed7cc46bb/41598_2021_82300_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f9/7859214/8d1059fa548a/41598_2021_82300_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f9/7859214/70d8bc49e356/41598_2021_82300_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f9/7859214/fc11f6e92318/41598_2021_82300_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f9/7859214/85d971492750/41598_2021_82300_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f9/7859214/9aa220c82e45/41598_2021_82300_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f9/7859214/e5bf0993df33/41598_2021_82300_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantifying lumbar vertebral perfusion by a Tofts model on DCE-MRI using segmental versus aortic arterial input function.通过 DCE-MRI 利用节段性与主动脉动脉输入函数对腰椎灌注进行定量 Tofts 建模。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 3;11(1):2920. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82300-6.
2
Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.志愿者研究中通过肾脏动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)得出的主动脉输入函数(AIF)的可重复性。
Eur J Radiol. 2009 Sep;71(3):576-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.09.025. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
3
Repeatability of arterial input functions and kinetic parameters in muscle obtained by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of the head and neck.头颈部动态对比增强磁共振成像获得的肌肉动脉输入函数和动力学参数的可重复性。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 May;68:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.01.010. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
4
A novel AIF tracking method and comparison of DCE-MRI parameters using individual and population-based AIFs in human breast cancer.一种新型的 AIF 追踪方法及个体和基于人群的 AIF 在人乳腺癌 DCE-MRI 参数中的比较。
Phys Med Biol. 2011 Sep 7;56(17):5753-69. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/17/018. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
5
Assessment of repeatability and treatment response in early phase clinical trials using DCE-MRI: comparison of parametric analysis using MR- and CT-derived arterial input functions.使用动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)评估早期临床试验中的可重复性和治疗反应:使用磁共振成像(MR)和计算机断层扫描(CT)衍生的动脉输入函数进行参数分析的比较
Eur Radiol. 2016 Jul;26(7):1991-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4012-9. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
6
A comparison of two methods for estimating DCE-MRI parameters via individual and cohort based AIFs in prostate cancer: a step towards practical implementation.通过个体和基于队列的动脉输入函数(AIF)估计前列腺癌动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)参数的两种方法比较:迈向实际应用的一步。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 May;32(4):321-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
7
Improved reliability of perfusion estimation in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI by using the arterial input function from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.通过使用动态对比增强 MRI 的动脉输入函数,提高动态磁化率对比 MRI 中灌注估计的可靠性。
NMR Biomed. 2024 Jan;37(1):e5038. doi: 10.1002/nbm.5038. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
8
Assessment of DCE-MRI parameters for brain tumors through implementation of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model approaches for Gd-DOTA.通过实施基于生理学的钆喷酸葡胺药代动力学模型方法评估脑肿瘤的动态对比增强磁共振成像参数。
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2016 Oct;43(5):529-47. doi: 10.1007/s10928-016-9493-x. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
9
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parametric mapping using high spatiotemporal resolution Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel MRI and iterative joint estimation of the arterial input function and pharmacokinetic parameters.使用高时空分辨率 Golden-angle RAdial 稀疏并行 MRI 和迭代联合估计动脉输入函数和药代动力学参数的动态对比增强 MRI 参数图。
NMR Biomed. 2022 Jul;35(7):e4718. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4718. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
10
Effects of artery input function on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for determining grades of gliomas.动脉内输入函数对动态对比增强磁共振成像确定胶质瘤分级的影响。
Br J Radiol. 2021 Mar 1;94(1119):20200699. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200699. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Total-Body Perfusion Imaging with [C]-Butanol.全身灌注成像技术与 [C]-正丁醇。
J Nucl Med. 2023 Nov;64(11):1831-1838. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265659. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
2
Delay of Aortic Arterial Input Function Time Improves Detection of Malignant Vertebral Body Lesions on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Perfusion.主动脉动脉输入函数时间延迟可改善动态对比增强磁共振成像灌注对恶性椎体病变的检测。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 18;15(8):2353. doi: 10.3390/cancers15082353.

本文引用的文献

1
Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of osseous spine metastasis before and 1 hour after high-dose image-guided radiation therapy.高剂量图像引导放射治疗前后1小时骨脊柱转移瘤的动态对比增强磁共振成像。
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Jan;42(1):E9. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.FOCUS16378.
2
The Impact of Arterial Input Function Determination Variations on Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pharmacokinetic Modeling: A Multicenter Data Analysis Challenge.动脉输入函数测定变化对前列腺动态对比增强磁共振成像药代动力学建模的影响:一项多中心数据分析挑战
Tomography. 2016 Mar;2(1):56-66. doi: 10.18383/j.tom.2015.00184.
3
Influence of amplitude-related perfusion parameters in the parotid glands by non-fat-saturated dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
非脂肪饱和动态对比增强磁共振成像对腮腺中与振幅相关灌注参数的影响
Med Phys. 2016 Apr;43(4):1873. doi: 10.1118/1.4943798.
4
Bolus arrival time and its effect on tissue characterization with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.团注到达时间及其对动态对比增强磁共振成像组织特征的影响。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2016 Jan;3(1):014503. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.3.1.014503. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
5
Comparison of analytical and numerical analysis of the reference region model for DCE-MRI.动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)参考区域模型的分析与数值分析比较
Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Sep;32(7):845-53. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
6
Arterial input function in perfusion MRI: a comprehensive review.灌注 MRI 的动脉输入函数:全面综述。
Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2013 Oct;74:1-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 May 11.
7
Measurement of blood perfusion in spinal metastases with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation of tumor response to radiation therapy.应用动态对比增强磁共振成像测量脊柱转移瘤的血流灌注:评估放疗的肿瘤反应。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Oct 15;38(22):E1418-24. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a40838.
8
Classic models for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.动态对比增强 MRI 的经典模型。
NMR Biomed. 2013 Aug;26(8):1004-27. doi: 10.1002/nbm.2940. Epub 2013 May 15.
9
A reference agent model for DCE MRI can be used to quantify the relative vascular permeability of two MRI contrast agents.可以使用 DCE-MRI 的参考代理模型来量化两种 MRI 对比剂的相对血管通透性。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Jul;31(6):900-10. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.12.002. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
10
A linear algorithm of the reference region model for DCE-MRI is robust and relaxes requirements for temporal resolution.DCE-MRI 参考区域模型的线性算法具有稳健性,放宽了对时间分辨率的要求。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 May;31(4):497-507. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.10.008. Epub 2012 Dec 8.