Suppr超能文献

切口疝的补片下修补或补片上修补的手术部位感染率更高吗?

Is the surgical site infection rate higher in sublay or onlay mesh repair of incisional hernia?

作者信息

Ibrahim Rashid, Abounozha Sabry, Alshehri Talal

机构信息

University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK.

Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Northumbria, UK.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jan 21;62:200-202. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.028. eCollection 2021 Feb.

Abstract

A best evidence topic has been constructed using a described protocol. The three-part question addressed was: In mesh repair of incisional hernia, which technique has a lower rate of surgical site infection (SSI), Sublay or Onlay? The best evidence showed that there is no statistically significant difference in the rate of SSI among the two techniques.

摘要

一个最佳证据主题是使用所描述的方案构建的。所探讨的三部分问题是:在切口疝的补片修补术中,哪种技术(腹膜前修补或网膜前修补)的手术部位感染(SSI)发生率较低?最佳证据表明,两种技术在SSI发生率方面没有统计学上的显著差异。

相似文献

7
Is the recurrence rate of incisional hernia is affected by mesh positioning?切口疝的复发率是否受补片位置的影响?
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jan 9;62:92-94. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.002. eCollection 2021 Feb.

本文引用的文献

7
Open repair of ventral incisional hernias.腹直肌切口疝开放修补术
Surg Clin North Am. 2008 Feb;88(1):61-83, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2007.10.008.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验