Suppr超能文献

切口疝的补片下修补或补片上修补的手术部位感染率更高吗?

Is the surgical site infection rate higher in sublay or onlay mesh repair of incisional hernia?

作者信息

Ibrahim Rashid, Abounozha Sabry, Alshehri Talal

机构信息

University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK.

Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Northumbria, UK.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jan 21;62:200-202. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.028. eCollection 2021 Feb.

Abstract

A best evidence topic has been constructed using a described protocol. The three-part question addressed was: In mesh repair of incisional hernia, which technique has a lower rate of surgical site infection (SSI), Sublay or Onlay? The best evidence showed that there is no statistically significant difference in the rate of SSI among the two techniques.

摘要

一个最佳证据主题是使用所描述的方案构建的。所探讨的三部分问题是:在切口疝的补片修补术中,哪种技术(腹膜前修补或网膜前修补)的手术部位感染(SSI)发生率较低?最佳证据表明,两种技术在SSI发生率方面没有统计学上的显著差异。

相似文献

7
Is the recurrence rate of incisional hernia is affected by mesh positioning?切口疝的复发率是否受补片位置的影响?
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jan 9;62:92-94. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.002. eCollection 2021 Feb.

本文引用的文献

7
Open repair of ventral incisional hernias.腹直肌切口疝开放修补术
Surg Clin North Am. 2008 Feb;88(1):61-83, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2007.10.008.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验