切口疝的复发率是否受补片位置的影响？
Is the recurrence rate of incisional hernia is affected by mesh positioning?
作者信息
Ibrahim Rashid, Alshehri Talal, Abounozha Sabry
机构信息
University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK.
Imam Abdulrahman Alfaisal Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
出版信息
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jan 9;62:92-94. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.002. eCollection 2021 Feb.
Abstract
A best evidence topic has been constructed using a described protocol. The three-part question addressed was: In open mesh repair of incisional hernia, which technique has a lower recurrence rate, Sublay or Onlay? The best evidence showed that there is no statistically significant difference in the rate of recurrence among the two techniques.
摘要
一个最佳证据主题已按照既定方案构建。所提出的三部分问题是：在切口疝的开放网片修补术中，哪种技术（腹膜前修补或网膜前修补）的复发率更低？最佳证据表明，两种技术的复发率在统计学上没有显著差异。
相似文献
1
Is the recurrence rate of incisional hernia is affected by mesh positioning?切口疝的复发率是否受补片位置的影响？
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jan 9;62:92-94. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.002. eCollection 2021 Feb.
2
Incidence of seroma in sublay versus onlay mesh repair of incisional hernia.切口疝修补术中采用补片下放置与补片上放置补片时血清肿的发生率。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Dec 30;61:155-157. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.12.029. eCollection 2021 Jan.
3
Is the surgical site infection rate higher in sublay or onlay mesh repair of incisional hernia?切口疝的补片下修补或补片上修补的手术部位感染率更高吗？
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jan 21;62:200-202. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.028. eCollection 2021 Feb.
4
Randomized prospective comparison of long-term results of onlay and sublay mesh repair techniques for incisional hernia.腹直肌旁切口疝补片外置和内置修补技术长期疗效的随机前瞻性比较
Turk J Surg. 2018 Jan 4;34(1):17-20. doi: 10.5152/turkjsurg.2017.3712. eCollection 2018.
5
Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.预防性网片覆盖加强与单纯缝合预防中线切口疝的随机对照多中心双盲 2 年随访研究（PRIMA）
Lancet. 2017 Aug 5;390(10094):567-576. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31332-6. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
6
Open retromuscular mesh repair versus onlay technique of incisional hernia: A randomized controlled trial.开放式经肌后间隙补片修补术与切口疝的上置修补术：一项随机对照试验。
Int J Surg. 2017 Jan;37:65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.008. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
7
Onlay Versus Sublay Mesh Repair for Incisional Hernias: A Systematic Review.腹壁切口疝修补术中补片置于皮下与肌前的系统评价
Cureus. 2023 Jan 24;15(1):e34156. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34156. eCollection 2023 Jan.
8
9
Comparisons of Onlay versus Sublay Mesh Fixation Technique in Ventral Abdominal Wall Incisional Hernia Repair.腹直肌前鞘与腹直肌后鞘补片固定技术在腹壁切口疝修补术中的比较
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019 Sep;29(9):819-822. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2019.09.819.
10
[Twenty-five years of experience in incisional hernia surgery. A comparative retrospective study of 432 incisional hernia repairs].[切口疝手术25年经验。432例切口疝修补术的比较性回顾研究]
Chirurg. 2003 Jul;74(7):638-45. doi: 10.1007/s00104-002-0594-2.
本文引用的文献
1
Comparisons of Onlay versus Sublay Mesh Fixation Technique in Ventral Abdominal Wall Incisional Hernia Repair.腹直肌前鞘与腹直肌后鞘补片固定技术在腹壁切口疝修补术中的比较
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019 Sep;29(9):819-822. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2019.09.819.
2
Randomized prospective comparison of long-term results of onlay and sublay mesh repair techniques for incisional hernia.腹直肌旁切口疝补片外置和内置修补技术长期疗效的随机前瞻性比较
Turk J Surg. 2018 Jan 4;34(1):17-20. doi: 10.5152/turkjsurg.2017.3712. eCollection 2018.
3
Explaining variation in ventral and inguinal hernia repair outcomes: A population-based analysis.解释腹侧疝和腹股沟疝修补结果的差异：一项基于人群的分析。
Surgery. 2017 Sep;162(3):628-639. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.03.013. Epub 2017 May 18.
4
Ventral Hernia Management: Expert Consensus Guided by Systematic Review.腹疝管理：基于系统评价的专家共识
Ann Surg. 2017 Jan;265(1):80-89. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001701.
5
Open retromuscular mesh repair versus onlay technique of incisional hernia: A randomized controlled trial.开放式经肌后间隙补片修补术与切口疝的上置修补术：一项随机对照试验。
Int J Surg. 2017 Jan;37:65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.008. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
6
A comparative analysis on various techniques of incisional hernia repair-experience from a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India.印度南部一家三级护理教学医院对各种切口疝修补技术的比较分析——经验总结
Indian J Surg. 2013 Aug;75(4):271-3. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0644-z. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
7
Towards evidence-based medicine in surgical practice: best BETs.迈向外科实践中的循证医学：最佳最佳证据。
Int J Surg. 2011;9(8):585-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.08.001. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
8
One-year follow-up after incisional hernia treatment: results of a prospective randomized study.切口疝治疗后 1 年随访：一项前瞻性随机研究的结果。
Hernia. 2010 Dec;14(6):575-82. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0686-8. Epub 2010 Jun 22.
9
Mesh-reinforced ventral hernia repair: preference for 2 techniques.补片加强修补腹疝：两种技术的偏好
Arch Surg. 2009 Aug;144(8):740-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.118.
10
Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia.切口疝缝合修补与补片修补随机对照试验的长期随访
Ann Surg. 2004 Oct;240(4):578-83; discussion 583-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000141193.08524.e7.
Zotero 插件