• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行动不便的老年住院患者中药物性血栓预防措施的使用不足:SWITCO65+队列研究

Underuse of medical thromboprophylaxis in mobile elderly inpatients: The SWITCO65+ cohort.

作者信息

Blondon Marc, Limacher Andreas, Righini Marc, Aujesky Drahomir, Méan Marie

机构信息

Division of Angiology and Hemostasis Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine Geneva Switzerland.

CTU Bern University of Bern Bern Switzerland.

出版信息

Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2020 Nov 6;5(1):142-147. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12361. eCollection 2021 Jan.

DOI:10.1002/rth2.12361
PMID:33537538
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7845057/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospital-associated venous thromboembolism (HA-VTE) can be prevented by pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. Thrombotic risk assessment models (RAMs) are essential tools to improve inadequately prescribed thromboprophylaxis. Among cases of HA-VTE, our study objectives are to explore the classifications of available thrombosis RAMs, the adequacy of thromboprophylaxis and risk factors for inadequate thromboprophylaxis.

METHODS

We identified cases of HA-VTE occurring during medical hospitalizations within a multicenter Swiss venous thromboembolism (VTE) cohort (2009-2013). We calculated the proportion of VTE cases deemed at high risk with 4 VTE RAMs (Geneva, Simplified Geneva, Padua, and Improve) and the adequacy of administered pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis, and explored risk factors for underprescription of thromboprophylaxis in high-risk inpatients.

RESULTS

Among 66 medical inpatients with HA-VTE, 60.6% had pulmonary embolism. The sensitivities of the Geneva, Simplified Geneva, Padua, and Improve RAMs were 86.4%, 80.3%, 72.7%, and 57.6%, respectively. The proportion of inadequate thromboprophylaxis was high, as 62.5%-71.1% of high-risk inpatients had not received it. Among the high-risk group according to the Simplified Geneva RAM, absence of immobilization was the only variable significantly associated with an inadequate use of thromboprophylaxis (odds ratio, 3.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-11.88).

CONCLUSIONS

We found a dramatically high proportion of inadequate medical thromboprophylaxis among inpatients who suffered from HA-VTE. This reinforces the need for global and local quality-improvement efforts to promote adequate use of thromboprophylaxis in elderly inpatients. Mobility may favor the underuse of thromboprophylaxis, and clinicians should stay alert to other thrombotic risk factors in mobile inpatients.

摘要

背景

医院相关性静脉血栓栓塞症(HA-VTE)可通过药物性血栓预防措施加以预防。血栓形成风险评估模型(RAMs)是改善血栓预防措施处方不当问题的重要工具。在HA-VTE病例中,我们的研究目的是探讨现有血栓形成RAMs的分类、血栓预防措施的充分性以及血栓预防措施不足的危险因素。

方法

我们在一个多中心瑞士静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)队列(2009 - 2013年)中确定了内科住院期间发生的HA-VTE病例。我们用4种VTE RAMs(日内瓦模型、简化日内瓦模型、帕多瓦模型和Improve模型)计算了被视为高危的VTE病例比例以及所给予的药物性血栓预防措施的充分性,并探讨了高危住院患者血栓预防措施处方不足的危险因素。

结果

在66例患有HA-VTE的内科住院患者中,60.6%发生了肺栓塞。日内瓦模型、简化日内瓦模型、帕多瓦模型和Improve模型的敏感性分别为86.4%、80.3%、72.7%和57.6%。血栓预防措施不足的比例很高,因为62.5% - 71.1%的高危住院患者未接受该措施。在简化日内瓦模型定义的高危组中,未制动是唯一与血栓预防措施使用不足显著相关的变量(比值比,3.59;95%置信区间,1.08 - 11.88)。

结论

我们发现,在患有HA-VTE的住院患者中,药物性血栓预防措施不足的比例极高。这强化了全球和地方为促进老年住院患者充分使用血栓预防措施而进行质量改进努力的必要性。活动能力可能导致血栓预防措施使用不足,临床医生应警惕活动患者中的其他血栓形成危险因素。

相似文献

1
Underuse of medical thromboprophylaxis in mobile elderly inpatients: The SWITCO65+ cohort.行动不便的老年住院患者中药物性血栓预防措施的使用不足:SWITCO65+队列研究
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2020 Nov 6;5(1):142-147. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12361. eCollection 2021 Jan.
2
Risk Assessment Models for Venous Thromboembolism in Medical Inpatients.内科住院患者静脉血栓栓塞风险评估模型。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e249980. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.9980.
3
Comparative Performance of Clinical Risk Assessment Models for Hospital-Acquired Venous Thromboembolism in Medical Patients.医学患者医院获得性静脉血栓栓塞症临床风险评估模型的比较性能。
Thromb Haemost. 2018 Jan;118(1):82-89. doi: 10.1160/TH17-06-0403. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
4
Overuse and underuse of thromboprophylaxis in medical inpatients.内科住院患者中血栓预防措施的过度使用和使用不足情况。
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2023 Aug 23;7(6):102184. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2023.102184. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
External validation of the simplified Geneva risk assessment model for hospital-associated venous thromboembolism in the Padua cohort.帕多瓦队列中用于医院相关性静脉血栓栓塞的简化日内瓦风险评估模型的外部验证
J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Mar;18(3):676-680. doi: 10.1111/jth.14688. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
6
A Prospective Observational Cohort of Clinical Outcomes in Medical Inpatients prescribed Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis Using Different Clinical Risk Assessment Models(COMPT RAMs).采用不同临床风险评估模型(COMPT RAMs)对住院患者进行药物性血栓预防治疗的前瞻性观察性队列研究的临床结局。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 4;9(1):18366. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54842-3.
7
Risk assessment models for venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. A systematic review.急性病内科患者静脉血栓栓塞症的风险评估模型。一项系统评价。
Thromb Haemost. 2017 Apr 3;117(4):801-808. doi: 10.1160/TH16-08-0631. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
8
Risk stratification for hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism in medical patients (RISE): Protocol for a prospective cohort study.医疗患者医院获得性静脉血栓栓塞症的风险分层(RISE):一项前瞻性队列研究的方案。
PLoS One. 2022 May 24;17(5):e0268833. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268833. eCollection 2022.
9
Venous thromboembolism risk assessment and prophylaxis in hospitalised medical patients in the Cape Town metropole, South Africa.南非开普敦大都市住院内科患者静脉血栓栓塞风险评估与预防。
S Afr Med J. 2022 Feb 1;112(2):13506.
10
Risk assessment models for venous thromboembolism in hospitalised adult patients: a systematic review.住院成年患者静脉血栓栓塞症风险评估模型:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 29;11(7):e045672. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045672.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of venous thromboembolism risk assessment models for hospital inpatients: the VTEAM evidence synthesis.医院住院患者静脉血栓栓塞风险评估模型的评估:VTEAM 证据综合评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Apr;28(20):1-166. doi: 10.3310/AWTW6200.
2
Overuse and underuse of thromboprophylaxis in medical inpatients.内科住院患者中血栓预防措施的过度使用和使用不足情况。
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2023 Aug 23;7(6):102184. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2023.102184. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Risk assessment models for venous thromboembolism in hospitalised adult patients: a systematic review.住院成年患者静脉血栓栓塞症风险评估模型:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 29;11(7):e045672. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045672.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine learning to predict venous thrombosis in acutely ill medical patients.机器学习用于预测急性病内科患者的静脉血栓形成。
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2020 Jan 21;4(2):230-237. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12292. eCollection 2020 Feb.
2
External validation of the simplified Geneva risk assessment model for hospital-associated venous thromboembolism in the Padua cohort.帕多瓦队列中用于医院相关性静脉血栓栓塞的简化日内瓦风险评估模型的外部验证
J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Mar;18(3):676-680. doi: 10.1111/jth.14688. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
3
Poor Adherence to Risk Stratification Guidelines Results in Overuse of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Older Adults.对风险分层指南的依从性差导致住院老年人静脉血栓栓塞预防措施的过度使用。
J Hosp Med. 2018 Jun 1;13(6):403-404. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2916. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
4
Patterns and outcomes of prescribing venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized older adults: a retrospective cohort study.住院老年患者静脉血栓栓塞症预防用药的模式和结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2018 Apr;45(3):369-376. doi: 10.1007/s11239-018-1611-8.
5
Comparative Performance of Clinical Risk Assessment Models for Hospital-Acquired Venous Thromboembolism in Medical Patients.医学患者医院获得性静脉血栓栓塞症临床风险评估模型的比较性能。
Thromb Haemost. 2018 Jan;118(1):82-89. doi: 10.1160/TH17-06-0403. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
6
Variation in Definitions of Immobility in Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis Clinical Trials in Medical Inpatients: A Systematic Review.内科住院患者药理血栓预防临床试验中活动减少定义的差异:一项系统评价
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2018 Jan;24(1):13-21. doi: 10.1177/1076029616677802. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
7
Predictors of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalised medical patients. Explicit ASsessment of Thromboembolic RIsk and Prophylaxis for Medical PATients in SwitzErland (ESTIMATE).住院内科患者血栓预防的预测因素。瑞士内科患者血栓栓塞风险与预防的明确评估(ESTIMATE)。
Thromb Haemost. 2015 May;113(5):1127-34. doi: 10.1160/TH14-06-0525. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
8
Multicentre validation of the Geneva Risk Score for hospitalised medical patients at risk of venous thromboembolism. Explicit ASsessment of Thromboembolic RIsk and Prophylaxis for Medical PATients in SwitzErland (ESTIMATE).日内瓦风险评分对有静脉血栓栓塞风险的住院内科患者的多中心验证。瑞士内科患者血栓栓塞风险与预防的明确评估(ESTIMATE)。
Thromb Haemost. 2014 Mar 3;111(3):531-8. doi: 10.1160/TH13-05-0427. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
9
The Swiss cohort of elderly patients with venous thromboembolism (SWITCO65+): rationale and methodology.瑞士老年静脉血栓栓塞患者队列研究(SWITCO65+):原理与方法
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2013 Nov;36(4):475-83. doi: 10.1007/s11239-013-0875-2.
10
Predictive and associative models to identify hospitalized medical patients at risk for VTE.预测和关联模型,以识别住院医疗患者中 VTE 风险患者。
Chest. 2011 Sep;140(3):706-714. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-1944. Epub 2011 Mar 24.