Suppr超能文献

通过区域分析对比医疗保健系统:以比利时和荷兰的医院入院情况为例。

The comparison of health care systems through regional analysis: the case of hospital admissions in Belgium and The Netherlands.

作者信息

Groenewegen P P, van der Zee J

机构信息

Netherlands Institute of Primary Health, Utrecht.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 1988;26(1):91-100. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90048-2.

Abstract

One of the problems in the international comparison of health care systems is the small number of units of analysis. Usually only a small number of systems is compared which makes cross-sectional statistical analysis impossible. The two obvious solutions to this problem--neither of which is generally feasible--are either to enlarge the number of systems being compared or to use time series on a small number of health care systems. Quite another solution is to study regional variations within and between a small number of systems. The number of regions has to be sufficiently large to make statistical analysis possible. This is the solution chosen in this article. The phenomenon which is central to our analysis is the number of hospital admissions per 1000 of the population. To explain variations in the hospital admission rate, it is hypothesized that there are a number of variables that have the same kind of influence on hospital admission rates in all western industrialized countries (such as the supply of hospital beds and the health status of the population). On the other hand there are determinants of regional variation in the number of admissions which either exert an influence dependent on the nature of the system, or are unique to a particular health care system. Concerning the first group of hypotheses (the general model), our analysis based on data for 1974 showed that the only variables to have a clear and equal influence on the regional variation in hospital admission rates in the Netherlands as well as in Belgium are the number of hospital beds per 1000 inhabitants and standardized mortality (an operationalization of the concept of health status). The influence of system-specific variables (the second group of hypotheses) has been analysed, taking the difference between the actual number of admissions and the number of admissions expected on the basis of the number of beds and mortality as the dependent variable. In the Netherlands, none of the variables appears to have a clear influence on the level of this ratio, whereas in Belgium there is a greater number of admissions than expected in regions with a higher birth-rate and a higher number of both general practitioners and specialists in the common disciplines (internal medicine, pediatrics, gynaecology) in relation to the total number of specialists.

摘要

医疗保健系统国际比较中的一个问题是分析单位数量较少。通常仅比较少数几个系统,这使得横断面统计分析无法进行。解决这个问题的两个明显办法——但通常都不可行——要么增加被比较系统的数量,要么对少数几个医疗保健系统使用时间序列数据。另一种截然不同的解决办法是研究少数几个系统内部和之间的区域差异。区域数量必须足够多,以便能够进行统计分析。这就是本文所采用的解决办法。我们分析的核心现象是每千人口的住院人数。为了解释住院率的差异,假设存在一些变量,这些变量对所有西方工业化国家的住院率都有相同类型的影响(如医院病床供应和人口健康状况)。另一方面,住院人数区域差异的决定因素要么根据系统的性质产生影响,要么是特定医疗保健系统所特有的。关于第一组假设(一般模型),我们基于1974年的数据进行的分析表明,对荷兰和比利时住院率区域差异有明确且同等影响的唯一变量是每千名居民的医院病床数量和标准化死亡率(健康状况概念的一种操作化指标)。对于特定系统变量(第二组假设)的影响,我们以实际住院人数与基于病床数量和死亡率预期的住院人数之间的差异为因变量进行了分析。在荷兰,似乎没有任何变量对该比率水平有明显影响,而在比利时,与专科医生总数相比,出生率较高且普通学科(内科、儿科、妇科)的全科医生和专科医生数量较多的地区,住院人数比预期的要多。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验