Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Feb;22(2):246-255. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30607-0.
Two radiotherapy fractionation schedules are used to treat locally advanced bladder cancer: 64 Gy in 32 fractions over 6·5 weeks and a hypofractionated schedule of 55 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks. Long-term outcomes of these schedules in several cohort studies and case series suggest that response, survival, and toxicity are similar, but no direct comparison has been published. The present study aimed to assess the non-inferiority of 55 Gy in 20 fractions to 64 Gy in 32 fractions in terms of invasive locoregional control and late toxicity in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer.
We did a meta-analysis of individual patient data from patients (age ≥18 years) with locally advanced bladder cancer (T1G3 [high-grade non-muscle invasive] or T2-T4, N0M0) enrolled in two multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trials done in the UK: BC2001 (NCT00024349; assessing addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy) and BCON (NCT00033436; assessing hypoxia-modifying therapy combined with radiotherapy). In each trial, the fractionation schedule was chosen according to local standard practice. Co-primary endpoints were invasive locoregional control (non-inferiority margin hazard ratio [HR]=1·25); and late bladder or rectum toxicity, assessed with the Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force-Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic tool (non-inferiority margin for absolute risk difference [RD]=10%). If non-inferiority was met for invasive locoregional control, superiority could be considered if the 95% CI for the treatment effect excluded the null effect (HR=1). One-stage individual patient data meta-analysis models for the time-to-event and binary outcomes were used, accounting for trial differences, within-centre correlation, randomised treatment received, baseline variable imbalances, and potential confounding from relevant prognostic factors.
782 patients with known fractionation schedules (456 from the BC2001 trial and 326 from the BCON trial; 376 (48%) received 64 Gy in 32 fractions and 406 (52%) received 55 Gy in 20 fractions) were included in our meta-analysis. Median follow-up was 120 months (IQR 99-159). Patients who received 55 Gy in 20 fractions had a lower risk of invasive locoregional recurrence than those who received 64 Gy in 32 fractions (adjusted HR 0·71 [95% CI 0·52-0·96]). Both schedules had similar toxicity profiles (adjusted RD -3·37% [95% CI -11·85 to 5·10]).
A hypofractionated schedule of 55 Gy in 20 fractions is non-inferior to 64 Gy in 32 fractions with regard to both invasive locoregional control and toxicity, and is superior with regard to invasive locoregional control. 55 Gy in 20 fractions should be adopted as a standard of care for bladder preservation in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer.
Cancer Research UK.
两种放疗分割方案用于治疗局部晚期膀胱癌:64Gy/32 次,6.5 周;55Gy/20 次,4 周。几项队列研究和病例系列的长期结果表明,两种方案的反应、生存和毒性相似,但尚未发表直接比较。本研究旨在评估局部晚期膀胱癌患者 55Gy/20 次与 64Gy/32 次在侵袭性局部区域控制和晚期毒性方面的非劣效性。
我们对来自英国两项多中心、随机、对照、3 期临床试验的局部晚期膀胱癌(T1G3[高级非肌肉浸润]或 T2-T4,N0M0)患者的个体患者数据进行了荟萃分析:BC2001(NCT00024349;评估化疗联合放疗)和 BCON(NCT00033436;评估缺氧修饰治疗联合放疗)。在每个试验中,分割方案根据当地标准实践选择。主要终点是侵袭性局部区域控制(非劣效性边缘危险比[HR]=1.25);和晚期膀胱或直肠毒性,用晚期效应正常组织工作组-主观、客观、管理、分析工具(绝对风险差异[RD]的非劣效性边缘=10%)评估。如果侵袭性局部区域控制达到非劣效性,如果治疗效果的 95%CI 排除了零效应(HR=1),则可以考虑优势。使用用于时间事件和二项结局的单阶段个体患者数据荟萃分析模型,考虑到试验差异、中心内相关性、随机治疗、基线变量失衡以及相关预后因素的潜在混杂。
782 名已知分割方案的患者(BC2001 试验 456 名,BCON 试验 326 名;376 名[48%]接受 64Gy/32 次,406 名[52%]接受 55Gy/20 次)纳入我们的荟萃分析。中位随访时间为 120 个月(IQR 99-159)。接受 55Gy/20 次的患者侵袭性局部区域复发风险低于接受 64Gy/32 次的患者(调整后的 HR 0.71 [95%CI 0.52-0.96])。两种方案的毒性谱相似(调整后的 RD-3.37%[95%CI-11.85 至 5.10])。
55Gy/20 次的分割方案在侵袭性局部区域控制和毒性方面均不劣于 64Gy/32 次,在侵袭性局部区域控制方面具有优势。55Gy/20 次应作为局部晚期膀胱癌患者膀胱保留的标准治疗。
英国癌症研究中心。