University Hospitals of North Midlands and University of Keele, Stoke on Trent, UK; Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, London, UK.
Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, London, UK.
Lancet. 2020 May 23;395(10237):1613-1626. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30932-6. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
We aimed to identify a five-fraction schedule of adjuvant radiotherapy (radiation therapy) delivered in 1 week that is non-inferior in terms of local cancer control and is as safe as an international standard 15-fraction regimen after primary surgery for early breast cancer. Here, we present 5-year results of the FAST-Forward trial.
FAST-Forward is a multicentre, phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority trial done at 97 hospitals (47 radiotherapy centres and 50 referring hospitals) in the UK. Patients aged at least 18 years with invasive carcinoma of the breast (pT1-3, pN0-1, M0) after breast conservation surgery or mastectomy were eligible. We randomly allocated patients to either 40 Gy in 15 fractions (over 3 weeks), 27 Gy in five fractions (over 1 week), or 26 Gy in five fractions (over 1 week) to the whole breast or chest wall. Allocation was not masked because of the nature of the intervention. The primary endpoint was ipsilateral breast tumour relapse; assuming a 2% 5-year incidence for 40 Gy, non-inferiority was predefined as ≤1·6% excess for five-fraction schedules (critical hazard ratio [HR] of 1·81). Normal tissue effects were assessed by clinicians, patients, and from photographs. This trial is registered at isrctn.com, ISRCTN19906132.
Between Nov 24, 2011, and June 19, 2014, we recruited and obtained consent from 4096 patients from 97 UK centres, of whom 1361 were assigned to the 40 Gy schedule, 1367 to the 27 Gy schedule, and 1368 to the 26 Gy schedule. At a median follow-up of 71·5 months (IQR 71·3 to 71·7), the primary endpoint event occurred in 79 patients (31 in the 40 Gy group, 27 in the 27 Gy group, and 21 in the 26 Gy group); HRs versus 40 Gy in 15 fractions were 0·86 (95% CI 0·51 to 1·44) for 27 Gy in five fractions and 0·67 (0·38 to 1·16) for 26 Gy in five fractions. 5-year incidence of ipsilateral breast tumour relapse after 40 Gy was 2·1% (1·4 to 3·1); estimated absolute differences versus 40 Gy in 15 fractions were -0·3% (-1·0 to 0·9) for 27 Gy in five fractions (probability of incorrectly accepting an inferior five-fraction schedule: p=0·0022 vs 40 Gy in 15 fractions) and -0·7% (-1·3 to 0·3) for 26 Gy in five fractions (p=0·00019 vs 40 Gy in 15 fractions). At 5 years, any moderate or marked clinician-assessed normal tissue effects in the breast or chest wall was reported for 98 of 986 (9·9%) 40 Gy patients, 155 (15·4%) of 1005 27 Gy patients, and 121 of 1020 (11·9%) 26 Gy patients. Across all clinician assessments from 1-5 years, odds ratios versus 40 Gy in 15 fractions were 1·55 (95% CI 1·32 to 1·83, p<0·0001) for 27 Gy in five fractions and 1·12 (0·94 to 1·34, p=0·20) for 26 Gy in five fractions. Patient and photographic assessments showed higher normal tissue effect risk for 27 Gy versus 40 Gy but not for 26 Gy versus 40 Gy.
26 Gy in five fractions over 1 week is non-inferior to the standard of 40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks for local tumour control, and is as safe in terms of normal tissue effects up to 5 years for patients prescribed adjuvant local radiotherapy after primary surgery for early-stage breast cancer.
National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme.
我们旨在确定一种在 1 周内进行的五分割辅助放疗(放疗)方案,该方案在局部癌症控制方面不逊于国际标准的 15 分割方案,同时在原发性乳腺癌手术后也是安全的。在这里,我们介绍 FAST-Forward 试验的 5 年结果。
FAST-Forward 是一项多中心、3 期、随机、非劣效性试验,在英国的 97 家医院(47 家放疗中心和 50 家转诊医院)进行。入组标准为接受保乳手术或乳房切除术的浸润性乳腺癌(pT1-3、pN0-1、M0)的年龄至少 18 岁的患者。我们将患者随机分配到 40 Gy 分 15 次(3 周)、27 Gy 分 5 次(1 周)或 26 Gy 分 5 次(1 周)到全乳房或胸壁。由于干预措施的性质,分配未进行盲法。主要终点是同侧乳房肿瘤复发;假设 40 Gy 的 5 年发生率为 2%,则对五分割方案的非劣效性预设为≤1.6%的超额(关键危险比[HR]为 1.81)。正常组织效应由临床医生、患者和照片评估。该试验在 isrctn.com 注册,注册号为 ISRCTN19906132。
在 2011 年 11 月 24 日至 2014 年 6 月 19 日期间,我们从英国 97 家中心招募了 4096 名患者并获得了他们的同意,其中 1361 名被分配到 40 Gy 方案组,1367 名被分配到 27 Gy 方案组,1368 名被分配到 26 Gy 方案组。在中位随访 71.5 个月(IQR 71.3-71.7)时,主要终点事件发生在 79 名患者中(40 Gy 组 31 例,27 Gy 组 27 例,26 Gy 组 21 例);与 40 Gy 分 15 次相比,27 Gy 分 5 次和 26 Gy 分 5 次的 HR 分别为 0.86(95%CI 0.51-1.44)和 0.67(0.38-1.16)。40 Gy 分 15 次治疗后的同侧乳房肿瘤复发 5 年发生率为 2.1%(1.4-3.1);与 40 Gy 分 15 次相比,27 Gy 分 5 次的绝对差异估计值为-0.3%(-1.0-0.9),26 Gy 分 5 次的绝对差异估计值为-0.7%(-1.3-0.3)。在 5 年时,986 名 40 Gy 患者中有 98 名(9.9%)、1005 名 27 Gy 患者中有 155 名(15.4%)和 1020 名 26 Gy 患者中有 121 名(11.9%)报告了任何中度或明显的临床医生评估的乳房或胸壁正常组织效应。在 1-5 年的所有临床医生评估中,与 40 Gy 分 15 次相比,27 Gy 分 5 次的比值比为 1.55(95%CI 1.32-1.83,p<0.0001),26 Gy 分 5 次的比值比为 1.12(0.94-1.34,p=0.20)。患者和照片评估显示,27 Gy 比 40 Gy 的正常组织效应风险更高,但 26 Gy 比 40 Gy 的风险没有更高。
26 Gy 分 5 次治疗在 1 周内与标准的 40 Gy 分 15 次治疗相比,在局部肿瘤控制方面不逊于后者,并且在原发性乳腺癌手术后的 5 年内,在正常组织效应方面与 26 Gy 分 15 次治疗一样安全。
英国国家卫生研究院卫生技术评估计划。