• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单侧双通道内镜脊柱手术中的水动力及其相关因素:一项体内比例回归和能力匹配研究。

Water Dynamics in Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery and Its Related Factors: An In Vivo Proportional Regression and Proficiency-Matched Study.

机构信息

Department of Spine Center, Barun-sesang Hospital, Kyung-ki, South Korea.

Department of Himchan UHS Spine and Joint Centre, University Hospital Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates; Department of Pharmaceutical Medicine and Regulatory Sciences, College of Medicine and Pharmacy, Yonsei University, Incheon, South Korea; Joint and Arthritis Research, Orthopaedic Surgery, Himchan Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2021 May;149:e836-e843. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.086. Epub 2021 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.086
PMID:33540105
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stable water dynamics during endoscopic spine surgery improves the surgeon's comfort and patient's outcomes. We aimed to measure the water dynamics during spinal surgery and identify the factors that facilitate stable water dynamics.

METHODS

This open-label, prospective, proficiency-matched, in vivo study included patients with single-level degenerative spinal disease. After assessing their heights and balancing the matched instrument, we measured the irrigation fluid pressure in various situations. We performed multiple regression analysis based on odds ratio (OR), confidence interval (CI), and relationships (proficiency-matched) with possible instrumental and physical characteristics. The instrumental factors were the presence and length of a rigid cannulation, and the physical characteristics were body mass index (body mass index [BMI]), skin-to-dura depth, height (interaction with BMI), and body weight (interaction with BMI).

RESULTS

Of the 36 patients, 29 were included. The mean pressure of the operation cavity was 16.66 ± 9.12 cm HO (12.25 ± 6.71 mm Hg). Water pressure with the rigid cannulation (9.41 ± 2.94 cm HO [6.92 ± 2.16 mm Hg]) was significantly lower than that without cannulation (23.43 ± 7.57 cm HO [17.26 ± 5.57 mm Hg], P < 0.01). Water pressure correlated with cannular length (OR = -1.08, CI = -1.79, -0.37, P < 0.01) and BMI (OR = 0.56, CI = 0.12, 0.99, P < 0.01). BMI showed a proportional relationship (r = 0.84, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

During biportal endoscopy, we suggest maintaining water pressure between 4.41 cm HO (2.41 mm Hg) and 31.00 cm HO (22.83 mm Hg). Compared to physical characteristics, placement of the cannula and appropriate cannula length are important factors that affect water dynamics.

摘要

背景

内窥镜脊柱手术过程中稳定的水动力环境可提高手术医生的舒适度和患者的手术效果。本研究旨在测量脊柱手术过程中的水动力环境,并确定有利于稳定水动力环境的因素。

方法

本开放性、前瞻性、熟练度匹配的体内研究纳入了单节段退行性脊柱疾病患者。评估其身高后,平衡匹配的器械,在各种情况下测量灌洗液压力。基于比值比(OR)、置信区间(CI)和可能的器械和物理特性(熟练度匹配)进行多元回归分析。器械因素包括刚性套管的存在和长度,物理特性包括体重指数(BMI)、皮肤到硬脊膜的深度、身高(与 BMI 相互作用)和体重(与 BMI 相互作用)。

结果

36 例患者中,29 例纳入研究。手术腔的平均压力为 16.66 ± 9.12 cm HO(12.25 ± 6.71 mm Hg)。带刚性套管时的水压(9.41 ± 2.94 cm HO[6.92 ± 2.16 mm Hg])明显低于无套管时的水压(23.43 ± 7.57 cm HO[17.26 ± 5.57 mm Hg],P < 0.01)。水压与套管长度相关(OR =-1.08,CI =-1.79,-0.37,P < 0.01)和 BMI(OR = 0.56,CI = 0.12,0.99,P < 0.01)。BMI 呈比例关系(r = 0.84,P < 0.01)。

结论

在双通道内窥镜下,我们建议将水压维持在 4.41 cm HO(2.41 mm Hg)至 31.00 cm HO(22.83 mm Hg)之间。与物理特性相比,套管的放置和适当的套管长度是影响水动力的重要因素。

相似文献

1
Water Dynamics in Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery and Its Related Factors: An In Vivo Proportional Regression and Proficiency-Matched Study.单侧双通道内镜脊柱手术中的水动力及其相关因素:一项体内比例回归和能力匹配研究。
World Neurosurg. 2021 May;149:e836-e843. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.086. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
2
Percutaneous biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a technical note and preliminary clinical results.经皮双门内镜下减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症:技术说明及初步临床结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Apr;24(4):602-7. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.SPINE15304. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
3
How I do it? Biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (BESS) for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.我是怎么做的?双门内镜脊柱手术(BESS)治疗腰椎管狭窄症。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 Mar;158(3):459-63. doi: 10.1007/s00701-015-2670-7. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
4
Biportal endoscopic technique in the treatment of spinal stenosis: early clinical experiences and results.双通道内窥镜技术治疗脊柱狭窄症:早期临床经验和结果。
Neurol Res. 2020 Dec;42(12):1085-1088. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2020.1803603. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
5
Comparative analysis of three types of minimally invasive decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: biportal endoscopy, uniportal endoscopy, and microsurgery.三种微创减压手术治疗腰椎中央型狭窄的对比分析:双通道内镜、单通道内镜和显微镜手术。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E9. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS197.
6
Risk Factors of Postoperative Spinal Epidural Hematoma After Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery.双通道内镜脊柱手术后脊髓硬膜外血肿的术后风险因素。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Sep;129:e324-e329. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.141. Epub 2019 May 31.
7
Is the Use of a Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Approach Associated with Rapid Recovery After Lumbar Decompressive Laminectomy? A Preliminary Analysis of a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.单侧双通道内镜下腰椎减压术后快速康复?一项前瞻性随机对照试验的初步分析。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Aug;128:e709-e718. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.240. Epub 2019 May 9.
8
Biportal endoscopic versus microscopic lumbar decompressive laminectomy in patients with spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial.双通道内窥镜与显微镜下腰椎减压椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症患者的随机对照试验。
Spine J. 2020 Feb;20(2):156-165. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.015. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
9
Clinical and radiological outcomes between biportal endoscopic decompression and microscopic decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症双门内镜减压与显微减压的临床及影像学结果
J Orthop Sci. 2020 May;25(3):371-378. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.05.022. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
10
Clinical Experiences of 3-Dimensional Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disease.三维双门内镜脊柱手术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床经验
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2022 Apr 1;22(4):231-238. doi: 10.1227/ONS.0000000000000090.

引用本文的文献

1
Intra-, Epidural And Intracranial Pressure Changes During Interlaminar Endoscopy, With and Without Dural Tear.椎板间内镜检查期间伴或不伴有硬脑膜撕裂时的颅内、硬膜外和颅内压力变化
Neurospine. 2025 Jun;22(2):583-591. doi: 10.14245/ns.2550456.228. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
2
Perioperative recognition and management of rare irrigation-related complications in unilateral biportal endoscopy under general anesthesia: two case reports.全身麻醉下单侧双孔道内镜手术中罕见冲洗相关并发症的围手术期识别与处理:两例报告
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jul 3. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09077-4.
3
Managing water dynamics for optimal outcomes in unilateral biportal endoscopic surgery: preliminary results in a new operative channel.
在单侧双孔道内镜手术中管理水动力学以实现最佳效果:新手术通道的初步结果
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Apr 21;26(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08645-5.
4
Comparative analysis of endoscopic discectomy for demanding lumbar disc herniation.复杂腰椎间盘突出症的内镜下椎间盘切除术的对比分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 17;15(1):9098. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91964-3.
5
Risk Analysis of Neurological Deterioration Associated With Fluid Insufflation in Uniportal Spine Endoscopy: A Case Series and Literature Review.单孔脊柱内镜下液体注入相关神经功能恶化的风险分析:病例系列研究与文献综述
Int J Spine Surg. 2025 Jun 12;19(3):279-287. doi: 10.14444/8730.
6
Analysis of the learning curve for unilateral biportal endoscopic technique using CUSUM method on fresh frozen cadavers.使用累积和(CUSUM)方法对新鲜冷冻尸体进行单侧双孔道内镜技术学习曲线的分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Dec 7;25(1):1007. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08123-4.
7
Key Factors in Fluid Irrigation Control: A Comparative Study of Arthroscope and Monoportal Scope in Biportal Spine Surgery.液体冲洗控制的关键因素:双门脊柱手术中关节镜与单门镜的比较研究
Cureus. 2024 Oct 30;16(10):e72738. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72738. eCollection 2024 Oct.
8
Expanded application of unilateral biportal endoscopy in adult thoracic disease: report of three cases and literature review.单侧双通道内镜在成人胸部疾病中的拓展应用:三例报告及文献复习
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jan;34(1):372-379. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08501-5. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
9
Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes between biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion.经皮双通道内镜下椎间孔腰椎间融合术与后路腰椎间融合术的临床和影像学结果比较。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 29;14(1):29652. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81402-1.
10
Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With a Comparison to Full-Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy.单侧双孔道内镜下颈椎后路椎间孔切开术的临床结果与并发症:一项系统评价和Meta分析,并与全内镜下颈椎后路椎间孔切开术进行比较
Neurospine. 2024 Sep;21(3):807-819. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448430.215. Epub 2024 Sep 30.