Leyro Teresa M, Versella Mark V, Yang Min-Jeong, Brinkman Hannah R, Hoyt Danielle L, Lehrer Paul
Department of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, United States.
Department of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, United States.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2021 Mar;84:101980. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101980. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
Respiratory abnormalities are a hallmark of anxiety symptomatology and may serve as clinically useful modifiers for alleviating anxiety symptoms. However, gold-standard anxiety treatments (e.g., cognitive-behavioral interventions) often do not directly address respiratory components despite their theoretical utility and clinical accessibility. This review examined the clinical effectiveness of respiratory interventions, interventions that directly target respiration abnormalities and processes, in treating trait anxiety symptoms.
The final analysis included 40 randomized controlled trials including at least one measure of trait anxiety, a respiratory-focused intervention group, and a non-respiratory control-group (active or inactive treatment). Overall effects of respiratory focused interventions were examined, as well as the effect of hypothesized moderators.
Respiratory component interventions yielded significantly greater improvements (moderate to large effect) in anxiety symptoms than controls, with the stronger effects observed in comparison to inactive, rather than active, control conditions. Significant heterogeneity in findings suggests that variability in intervention design, population, and control comparison may obfuscate interpretation of findings.
Evidence supports the clinical utility of respiratory interventions as either an independent anxiety treatment, or as an adjunct to other interventions. Clinical and research implications of findings along with recommendations for ongoing investigations in this domain are discussed.
呼吸异常是焦虑症状的一个标志,可能是缓解焦虑症状的临床有用调节因素。然而,尽管金标准焦虑治疗方法(如认知行为干预)具有理论效用且临床可及性高,但通常并未直接针对呼吸方面。本综述考察了呼吸干预(即直接针对呼吸异常及过程的干预)在治疗特质焦虑症状方面的临床效果。
最终分析纳入了40项随机对照试验,这些试验包括至少一项特质焦虑测量指标、一个以呼吸为重点的干预组以及一个非呼吸对照组(积极或非积极治疗)。考察了以呼吸为重点的干预措施的总体效果以及假设调节因素的效果。
与对照组相比,呼吸成分干预在焦虑症状方面产生了显著更大的改善(中度到较大效应),与非积极而非积极对照条件相比,观察到的效应更强。研究结果存在显著异质性,表明干预设计、人群和对照比较的差异可能会混淆对研究结果的解释。
有证据支持呼吸干预作为独立的焦虑治疗方法或其他干预措施的辅助手段的临床效用。讨论了研究结果的临床和研究意义以及该领域正在进行的调查的建议。