• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Hybrid design evaluating new biomarkers when there is an existing screening test.当存在现有筛查测试时,采用混合设计评估新的生物标志物。
Stat Med. 2021 Apr 15;40(8):2037-2054. doi: 10.1002/sim.8890. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Overview of the epidemiology methods and applications: strengths and limitations of observational study designs.流行病学方法与应用概述:观察性研究设计的优势与局限性。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2010;50 Suppl 1(s1):10-2. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2010.526838.
4
5
On the design and the analysis of stratified biomarker trials in the presence of measurement error.存在测量误差时分层生物标志物试验的设计与分析。
Stat Med. 2021 May 30;40(12):2783-2799. doi: 10.1002/sim.8928. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
6
Adjustment for measurement error in evaluating diagnostic biomarkers by using an internal reliability sample.利用内部可靠性样本评估诊断生物标志物时的测量误差调整。
Stat Med. 2013 Nov 30;32(27):4709-25. doi: 10.1002/sim.5878. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
7
Run-in phase III trial design with pharmacodynamics predictive biomarkers.带有药效动力学预测生物标志物的 III 期试验设计。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Nov 6;105(21):1628-33. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt265. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
8
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
9
Unbiased estimation of biomarker panel performance when combining training and testing data in a group sequential design.在成组序贯设计中合并训练数据和测试数据时生物标志物组合性能的无偏估计。
Biometrics. 2016 Sep;72(3):888-96. doi: 10.1111/biom.12480. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
10
The effect of direct referral for fast CT scan in early lung cancer detection in general practice. A clinical, cluster-randomised trial.在全科医疗中,直接转诊进行快速CT扫描对早期肺癌检测的效果。一项临床、整群随机试验。
Dan Med J. 2015 Mar;62(3).

本文引用的文献

1
A Bayesian Phase I/II Trial Design for Immunotherapy.一种用于免疫疗法的贝叶斯 I/II 期试验设计。
J Am Stat Assoc. 2018;113(523):1016-1027. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2017.1383260. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
2
Model to Determine Risk of Pancreatic Cancer in Patients With New-Onset Diabetes.用于确定新发糖尿病患者罹患胰腺癌风险的模型。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Sep;155(3):730-739.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.05.023. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
3
Master Protocols to Study Multiple Therapies, Multiple Diseases, or Both.用于研究多种疗法、多种疾病或两者兼有的主方案。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 6;377(1):62-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1510062.
4
Early-Phase Studies of Biomarkers: What Target Sensitivity and Specificity Values Might Confer Clinical Utility?生物标志物的早期研究:何种目标敏感性和特异性值可能具有临床实用性?
Clin Chem. 2016 May;62(5):737-42. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2015.252163. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
5
Unbiased estimation of biomarker panel performance when combining training and testing data in a group sequential design.在成组序贯设计中合并训练数据和测试数据时生物标志物组合性能的无偏估计。
Biometrics. 2016 Sep;72(3):888-96. doi: 10.1111/biom.12480. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
6
A robust Bayesian dose-finding design for phase I/II clinical trials.一种用于I/II期临床试验的稳健贝叶斯剂量探索设计。
Biostatistics. 2016 Apr;17(2):249-63. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxv040. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
7
A simple way to measure the burden of interval cancers in breast cancer screening.一种测量乳腺癌筛查期间癌症负担的简单方法。
BMC Cancer. 2014 Oct 24;14:782. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-782.
8
European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition--summary document.欧洲乳腺癌筛查与诊断质量保证指南。第四版——总结文件。
Ann Oncol. 2008 Apr;19(4):614-22. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm481. Epub 2007 Nov 17.
9
A review of phase 2-3 clinical trial designs.2-3期临床试验设计综述。
Lifetime Data Anal. 2008 Mar;14(1):37-53. doi: 10.1007/s10985-007-9049-x. Epub 2007 Sep 2.
10
Evaluating new screening tests for breast cancer.评估乳腺癌的新型筛查测试。
BMJ. 2006 Mar 25;332(7543):678-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7543.678.

当存在现有筛查测试时,采用混合设计评估新的生物标志物。

Hybrid design evaluating new biomarkers when there is an existing screening test.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2021 Apr 15;40(8):2037-2054. doi: 10.1002/sim.8890. Epub 2021 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1002/sim.8890
PMID:33540472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8411462/
Abstract

Development of cancer screening biomarkers usually follows the Early Detection Research Network 5-Phase guideline in Pepe et al. A key feature of this guide is that the phased development follows a sequential order, moving to the next phase only when the current phase study is complete and has met its target performance. Motivated by a newly funded Newly onset Diabetes cohort study, we propose a design evaluating new biomarkers to discriminate between cases and controls in the presence of an existing screening test. The proposed design achieves two goals: (1) avoiding bias in estimating sensitivity or specificity in predicting cancer at a given time period prior to clinical diagnosis, using data from both screening detected cancers in Phase IV study and clinically diagnosed cancers in Phase III study; and (2) building a panel with biomarkers for Phase III and IV studies based on all data. A simulation study shows that the proposed design outperforms both a conventional method using data in Phase III arm only and a naive method using data in Phase III and IV arms ignoring the difference between the time of screening the detected cancer and the time of clinical diagnosis. The proposed design yields a smaller standard error of the estimation and increases the statistical power to confirm biomarker performance. This proposed method has the potential to shorten the cancer screening biomarker development process, use resources more effectively, and bring benefits to patients quickly.

摘要

癌症筛查生物标志物的开发通常遵循 Pepe 等人的早期检测研究网络 5 阶段指南。该指南的一个关键特征是分阶段的开发遵循顺序进行,只有当前阶段的研究完成并达到其目标性能后,才能进入下一阶段。受新资助的新发糖尿病队列研究的启发,我们提出了一种设计方案,用于评估新的生物标志物,以在存在现有筛查测试的情况下区分病例和对照。该设计方案实现了两个目标:(1)通过使用第四阶段研究中筛查检测到的癌症和第三阶段研究中临床诊断的癌症的数据,避免在临床诊断前的特定时间段内预测癌症时对敏感性或特异性的估计产生偏差;(2)基于所有数据为第三阶段和第四阶段研究构建一个包含生物标志物的面板。模拟研究表明,与仅使用第三阶段数据的传统方法和忽略筛查检测到的癌症时间和临床诊断时间之间差异的使用第三阶段和第四阶段数据的简单方法相比,该设计方案具有更好的性能。该设计方案可以减少估计的标准误差,并提高确认生物标志物性能的统计功效。该方法有可能缩短癌症筛查生物标志物的开发过程,更有效地利用资源,并迅速为患者带来益处。