Suppr超能文献

带有药效动力学预测生物标志物的 III 期试验设计。

Run-in phase III trial design with pharmacodynamics predictive biomarkers.

机构信息

Affiliations of authors: Departments of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA (FH); Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (RS).

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Nov 6;105(21):1628-33. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt265. Epub 2013 Oct 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Developments in biotechnology have stimulated the use of predictive biomarkers to identify patients who are likely to benefit from a targeted therapy. Several randomized phase III designs have been introduced for development of a targeted therapy using a diagnostic test. Most such designs require biomarkers measured before treatment. In many cases, it has been very difficult to identify such biomarkers. Promising candidate biomarkers can sometimes be effectively measured after a short run-in period on the new treatment.

METHODS

We introduce a new design for phase III trials with a candidate predictive pharmacodynamic biomarker measured after a short run-in period. Depending on the therapy and the biomarker performance, the trial would either randomize all patients but perform a separate analysis on the biomarker-positive patients or only randomize marker-positive patients after the run-in period. We evaluate the proposed design compared with the conventional phase III design and discuss how to design a run-in trial based on phase II studies.

RESULTS

The proposed design achieves a major sample size reduction compared with the conventional randomized phase III design in many cases when the biomarker has good sensitivity (≥0.7) and specificity (≥0.7). This requires that the biomarker be measured accurately and be indicative of drug activity. However, the proposed design loses some of its advantage when the proportion of potential responders is large (>50%) or the effect on survival from run-in period is substantial.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating a pharmacodynamic biomarker requires careful consideration but can expand the capacity of clinical trials to personalize treatment decisions and enhance therapeutics development.

摘要

背景

生物技术的发展刺激了预测性生物标志物的使用,以识别可能从靶向治疗中获益的患者。已经引入了几种使用诊断测试开发靶向治疗的随机 III 期设计。大多数此类设计需要在治疗前测量生物标志物。在许多情况下,很难确定此类生物标志物。有前途的候选生物标志物有时可以在新治疗的短期导入期后有效测量。

方法

我们介绍了一种新的 III 期试验设计,用于测量短导入期后的候选预测药效学生物标志物。根据治疗方法和生物标志物性能,试验要么对所有患者进行随机分组,但对生物标志物阳性患者进行单独分析,要么仅在导入期后对标志物阳性患者进行随机分组。我们评估了与传统 III 期设计相比的拟议设计,并讨论了如何根据 II 期研究设计导入试验。

结果

在许多情况下,当生物标志物具有良好的灵敏度(≥0.7)和特异性(≥0.7)时,与传统的随机 III 期设计相比,该设计在许多情况下实现了主要的样本量减少。这需要生物标志物的准确测量,并能指示药物活性。但是,当潜在反应者的比例较大(>50%)或导入期对生存的影响很大时,该设计会失去部分优势。

结论

纳入药效学生物标志物需要仔细考虑,但可以扩大临床试验的能力,以做出个性化的治疗决策并增强治疗学的发展。

相似文献

2
Randomized phase II trial designs with biomarkers.随机化二期临床试验设计与生物标志物。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Sep 10;30(26):3304-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.3946. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
3
Design issues in randomized phase II/III trials.随机化 II/III 期临床试验中的设计问题。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb 20;30(6):667-71. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.5732. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
5
Biomarker threshold adaptive designs for survival endpoints.用于生存终点的生物标志物阈值适应性设计。
J Biopharm Stat. 2018;28(6):1038-1054. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2018.1434191. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
8
New designs for basket clinical trials in oncology.肿瘤学中篮子临床试验的新设计。
J Biopharm Stat. 2018;28(2):245-255. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2017.1372779. Epub 2017 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Randomized clinical trials with biomarkers: design issues.随机临床试验与生物标志物:设计问题。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Feb 3;102(3):152-60. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp477. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
8
Evaluation of randomized discontinuation design.随机撤药设计的评估
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 1;23(22):5094-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.520. Epub 2005 Jun 27.
10
On the efficiency of targeted clinical trials.论靶向临床试验的效率。
Stat Med. 2005 Feb 15;24(3):329-39. doi: 10.1002/sim.1975.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验