Affiliations of authors: Departments of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA (FH); Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (RS).
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Nov 6;105(21):1628-33. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt265. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
Developments in biotechnology have stimulated the use of predictive biomarkers to identify patients who are likely to benefit from a targeted therapy. Several randomized phase III designs have been introduced for development of a targeted therapy using a diagnostic test. Most such designs require biomarkers measured before treatment. In many cases, it has been very difficult to identify such biomarkers. Promising candidate biomarkers can sometimes be effectively measured after a short run-in period on the new treatment.
We introduce a new design for phase III trials with a candidate predictive pharmacodynamic biomarker measured after a short run-in period. Depending on the therapy and the biomarker performance, the trial would either randomize all patients but perform a separate analysis on the biomarker-positive patients or only randomize marker-positive patients after the run-in period. We evaluate the proposed design compared with the conventional phase III design and discuss how to design a run-in trial based on phase II studies.
The proposed design achieves a major sample size reduction compared with the conventional randomized phase III design in many cases when the biomarker has good sensitivity (≥0.7) and specificity (≥0.7). This requires that the biomarker be measured accurately and be indicative of drug activity. However, the proposed design loses some of its advantage when the proportion of potential responders is large (>50%) or the effect on survival from run-in period is substantial.
Incorporating a pharmacodynamic biomarker requires careful consideration but can expand the capacity of clinical trials to personalize treatment decisions and enhance therapeutics development.
生物技术的发展刺激了预测性生物标志物的使用,以识别可能从靶向治疗中获益的患者。已经引入了几种使用诊断测试开发靶向治疗的随机 III 期设计。大多数此类设计需要在治疗前测量生物标志物。在许多情况下,很难确定此类生物标志物。有前途的候选生物标志物有时可以在新治疗的短期导入期后有效测量。
我们介绍了一种新的 III 期试验设计,用于测量短导入期后的候选预测药效学生物标志物。根据治疗方法和生物标志物性能,试验要么对所有患者进行随机分组,但对生物标志物阳性患者进行单独分析,要么仅在导入期后对标志物阳性患者进行随机分组。我们评估了与传统 III 期设计相比的拟议设计,并讨论了如何根据 II 期研究设计导入试验。
在许多情况下,当生物标志物具有良好的灵敏度(≥0.7)和特异性(≥0.7)时,与传统的随机 III 期设计相比,该设计在许多情况下实现了主要的样本量减少。这需要生物标志物的准确测量,并能指示药物活性。但是,当潜在反应者的比例较大(>50%)或导入期对生存的影响很大时,该设计会失去部分优势。
纳入药效学生物标志物需要仔细考虑,但可以扩大临床试验的能力,以做出个性化的治疗决策并增强治疗学的发展。