Suppr超能文献

比较丙泊酚靶控输注与手动输注用于电抽搐治疗中的麻醉效果:一项开放标签随机对照试验。

Comparison of the target-controlled infusion and the manual infusion of propofol anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy: an open-label randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 4;21(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03069-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol is a well-established method of procedural sedation and has been used in Japan for anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). However, the usefulness of the TCI of propofol for ECT has yet to be determined. This study aimed to compare the TCI and manual infusion (MI) of propofol anesthesia during ECT.

METHODS

A total of forty psychiatric inpatients receiving bitemporal ECT were enrolled in the present study and randomized into the TCI group (N = 20) and the MI group (N = 20). Clinical Global Impression (CGI) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores were measured before and after ECT. The clinical outcomes, anesthesia-related variables, and ECT-related variables were compared between the two groups. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to model the comparison throughout the course of ECT.

RESULTS

A total of 36 subjects completed the present study, with 18 subjects in each group. Both the groups didn't significantly differ in the post-ECT changes in CGI and MoCA scores. However, concerning MoCA scores after 6 treatments of ECT, the MI group had improvement while the TCI group had deterioration. Compared with the MI group, the TCI group had higher doses of propofol, and longer procedural and recovery time. The TCI group seemed to have more robust seizures in the early course of ECT but less robust seizures in the later course of ECT compared with the MI group.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study does not support the use of TCI of propofol for anesthesia of ECT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

(ClinicalTrials.gov): NCT03863925 . Registered March 5, 2019 - Retrospectively registered.

摘要

背景

异丙酚靶控输注(TCI)是一种成熟的镇静方法,已在日本用于电惊厥治疗(ECT)期间的麻醉。然而,异丙酚 TCI 在 ECT 中的有效性尚未确定。本研究旨在比较 TCI 和异丙酚手动输注(MI)在 ECT 中的麻醉效果。

方法

本研究共纳入 40 名接受双颞部 ECT 的精神科住院患者,并将其随机分为 TCI 组(N=20)和 MI 组(N=20)。在 ECT 前后测量临床总体印象(CGI)和蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)评分。比较两组的临床结局、麻醉相关变量和 ECT 相关变量。使用广义估计方程(GEE)对整个 ECT 过程中的比较进行建模。

结果

共有 36 名受试者完成了本研究,每组 18 名。两组在 ECT 后 CGI 和 MoCA 评分的变化均无显著差异。然而,在 ECT 治疗 6 次后的 MoCA 评分方面,MI 组有改善,而 TCI 组则有恶化。与 MI 组相比,TCI 组异丙酚用量更高,手术和恢复时间更长。与 MI 组相比,TCI 组在 ECT 早期的癫痫发作似乎更剧烈,但在 ECT 后期的癫痫发作则较不剧烈。

结论

本研究不支持 TCI 用于 ECT 的麻醉。

试验注册

(ClinicalTrials.gov):NCT03863925。2019 年 3 月 5 日注册 - 回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bb7/7863537/ef2f55d48894/12888_2021_3069_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验