Reiertsen O, Bakka A, Trønnes S, Gauperaa T
Department of Surgery, Akershus Central Hospital, Norway.
Acta Chir Scand. 1988 Jan;154(1):53-5.
The diagnostic efficacy of routine double-contrast barium enema and fiberoptic coloscopy for detection of cancer was retrospectively studied in 303 patients consecutively operated for colorectal adenocarcinoma in a 52-month period from January 1980. Double-contrast barium enema was performed in 180 patients with 184 carcinomas, 157 (85%) of which were revealed by this examination. The detection rate of carcinoma according to site was 89% between cecum and descending colon, 92% in sigmoid colon and 71% in rectum. Fiberoptic colonoscopy was done in 176 patients with 181 carcinomas, 163 (90%) of which were detected by the endoscopical examination. The detection rate of carcinoma according to site was 86% between cecum and descending colon, 90% in sigmoid colon and 95% in rectum. The two methods were equally effective in detecting carcinoma of the colon. Colonoscopy was superior to barium enema in detection of rectal carcinoma.
1980年1月至52个月期间,对303例因结直肠癌连续接受手术的患者进行回顾性研究,以探讨常规双对比钡灌肠和纤维结肠镜检查对癌症的诊断效能。180例患者接受了双对比钡灌肠检查,共发现184处癌灶,其中157处(85%)通过该检查被发现。根据部位,盲肠至降结肠癌灶的检出率为89%,乙状结肠癌灶的检出率为92%,直肠癌灶的检出率为71%。176例患者接受了纤维结肠镜检查,共发现181处癌灶,其中163处(90%)通过内镜检查被发现。根据部位,盲肠至降结肠癌灶的检出率为86%,乙状结肠癌灶的检出率为90%,直肠癌灶的检出率为95%。两种方法在检测结肠癌方面同样有效。在检测直肠癌方面,结肠镜检查优于钡灌肠检查。