Karrie A. Shogren, Graham G. Rifenbark, and Mayumi Hagiwara, University of Kansas.
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2021 Feb 1;59(1):55-69. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-59.1.55.
This article analyzes the reliability and factor structure of the Self-Determination Inventory: Adult Report (SDI:AR) in adults with and without intellectual disability. There is a critical need for contemporary assessment tools given the emphasis on self-determination outcomes in disability supports and services. The findings suggest that the same set of items can be used across adults with and without intellectual disability. However, there are significant differences in overall self-determination across adults with and without intellectual disability, with adults with intellectual disability scoring lower on the SDI:AR. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
本文分析了《自主决定问卷：成人报告版》（SDI:AR）在有智力障碍和无智力障碍的成年人中的信度和因素结构。鉴于残疾支持和服务中强调自主决定的结果，因此非常需要有现代的评估工具。研究结果表明，对于有和没有智力障碍的成年人，可以使用相同的项目集。然而，有智力障碍的成年人和无智力障碍的成年人在总体自主决定方面存在显著差异，有智力障碍的成年人在 SDI:AR 上的得分较低。文章还讨论了研究和实践的意义。
