JBI, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Adelaide Nursing School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Apr;77(4):2102-2113. doi: 10.1111/jan.14743. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
The aim of this study is to discuss the available methodological resources and best-practice guidelines for the development and completion of scoping reviews relevant to nursing and midwifery policy, practice, and research.
Discussion Paper.
Scoping reviews that exemplify best practice are explored with reference to the recently updated JBI scoping review guide (2020) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Scoping Review extension (PRISMA-ScR).
Scoping reviews are an increasingly common form of evidence synthesis. They are used to address broad research questions and to map evidence from a variety of sources. Scoping reviews are a useful form of evidence synthesis for those in nursing and midwifery and present opportunities for researchers to review a broad array of evidence and resources. However, scoping reviews still need to be conducted with rigour and transparency.
This study provides guidance and advice for researchers and clinicians who are preparing to undertake an evidence synthesis and are considering a scoping review methodology in the field of nursing and midwifery.
With the increasing popularity of scoping reviews, criticism of the rigour, transparency, and appropriateness of the methodology have been raised across multiple academic and clinical disciplines, including nursing and midwifery. This discussion paper provides a unique contribution by discussing each component of a scoping review, including: developing research questions and objectives; protocol development; developing eligibility criteria and the planned search approach; searching and selecting the evidence; extracting and analysing evidence; presenting results; and summarizing the evidence specifically for the fields of nursing and midwifery. Considerations for when to select this methodology and how to prepare a review for publication are also discussed. This approach is applied to the disciplines of nursing and midwifery to assist nursing and/or midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics.
本研究旨在讨论与护理和助产政策、实践和研究相关的范围综述的现有方法资源和最佳实践指南。
讨论论文。
参考最近更新的 JBI 范围综述指南(2020 年)和系统评价和荟萃分析范围综述扩展的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR),探讨体现最佳实践的范围综述。
范围综述是一种越来越常见的证据综合形式。它们用于解决广泛的研究问题,并从各种来源绘制证据。范围综述是护理和助产领域进行证据综合的有用形式,为研究人员提供了审查广泛证据和资源的机会。然而,范围综述仍然需要严谨和透明地进行。
本研究为准备进行证据综合并正在考虑在护理和助产领域采用范围综述方法的研究人员和临床医生提供了指导和建议。
随着范围综述的日益普及,多个学术和临床学科,包括护理和助产,对该方法的严谨性、透明度和适当性提出了批评。本讨论论文通过讨论范围综述的每个组成部分提供了独特的贡献,包括:制定研究问题和目标;制定方案;制定纳入标准和计划的搜索方法;搜索和选择证据;提取和分析证据;呈现结果;以及专门针对护理和助产领域总结证据。还讨论了何时选择这种方法以及如何为发表综述做准备的问题。这种方法适用于护理和助产学科,以帮助护理和/或助产学生、临床医生、研究人员和学者。