Faculty of Medicine, Minia Urology and Nephrology University Hospital, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.
Nile SWL Center, Minia, Egypt.
J Endourol. 2021 Jul;35(7):1090-1096. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.1064. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) results in a lower stone-free rate (SFR) for ectopic kidneys when using the standard technique, directing the shock wave from the same side of the stone; however, this may not be the optimal approach when the ectopic kidney is located more medial and anterior than the normally positioned kidney. Thus, contralateral coupling where waves come from the opposite direction may result in a better outcome. We tested the feasibility and outcome of contralateral coupling during SWL for stone in ectopic kidney. We prospectively recruited 20 patients with simple renal ectopia, who presented with renal stones that were amenable for SWL in the period between 2014 and 2018 at outpatient clinic of urology department, Minia University. Patients received SWL in Private Nile SWL Center were included to benefit from the ability of the electromagnetic SWL lithotripter. We did SWL in a supine position, and then contralateral coupling was performed from the opposite side of the affected kidney, rather than using the standard ipsilateral coupling approach. The SFR and various pre-, intra-, and postprocedural SWL variables were assessed, including stone characteristics, body habitus, shock wave numbers, and auxiliary measures. Count and percentages were calculated. The mean stone radius was 14.7 mm with a mean S.T.O.N.E. (size, topography, obstructions, number of stones, and evaluation of HUs) of 9.6 points. Effective SWL was achieved in 80% of cases, 65% of them were stone free with effective single SWL session in 56% of cases. Hematuria, infection, and obstruction occurred in 50%, 20%, and 15% cases, respectively. One case required ureteral stent insertion. SWL applied through contralateral coupling is feasible, with comparable safety profile to the standard ipsilateral approach. Better SFR was achieved with the contralateral approach, in fewer sessions. However, the recruitment of more cases is necessary.
体外冲击波碎石术 (SWL) 采用标准技术时,对于异位肾中的结石,其无石率 (SFR) 较低,即从结石所在侧的同一方向引导冲击波;然而,对于位于正常肾更内侧和前侧的异位肾,这种方法可能不是最佳方法。因此,来自相反方向的对侧耦合可能会产生更好的结果。我们测试了 SWL 治疗异位肾结石中对侧耦合的可行性和结果。我们前瞻性招募了 20 名患有单纯性肾异位的患者,他们在 2014 年至 2018 年期间在米尼亚大学泌尿外科门诊就诊,患有适合 SWL 的肾结石。我们在私立尼罗河 SWL 中心进行 SWL 治疗,以受益于电磁 SWL 碎石机的能力。我们采用仰卧位进行 SWL,然后从受影响肾脏的对侧进行对侧耦合,而不是采用标准的同侧耦合方法。评估了 SFR 和各种术前、术中、术后 SWL 变量,包括结石特征、体型、冲击波数量和辅助措施。计算了计数和百分比。平均结石半径为 14.7mm,平均 S.T.O.N.E.(大小、地形、梗阻、结石数量和 HUs 评估)为 9.6 分。80%的病例有效进行了 SWL,其中 65%的病例在 56%的病例中通过单次有效 SWL 治疗实现了无石状态。血尿、感染和梗阻分别发生在 50%、20%和 15%的病例中。有 1 例需要输尿管支架置入。通过对侧耦合进行 SWL 是可行的,其安全性与标准同侧方法相当。对侧方法的 SFR 更高,所需治疗次数更少。然而,需要招募更多的病例。