• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神卫生环境中的药物共享和共同决策:我们已经走了多远?

Shared and Supported Decision Making in Medication in a Mental Health Setting: How Far Have We Come?

机构信息

West London NHS Trust, London, UK.

Dept of Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Community Ment Health J. 2021 Nov;57(8):1566-1578. doi: 10.1007/s10597-021-00780-2. Epub 2021 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1007/s10597-021-00780-2
PMID:33544295
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8531065/
Abstract

Personalised care involves shared decision making (SDM) across all levels including choice in medication. However, there are a number of barriers which prevent its effective implementation in routine mental health settings. Therefore, we undertook a study to benchmark current practice across clinical services of a large urban mental health provider. The study formed part of the trust-wide 'Supported Decision Making in Medication' Co-Production Project and aims to inform future recommendations in delivering against contemporary best practice, guidance and policy. A survey exploring the views and experiences of service users and prescribers on shared and supported decision-making in medication was carried out in West London NHS Trust. Questionnaires were fully co-designed and co-delivered by a group of health professionals and individuals with lived experience. There were 100 responses from service users and 35 from prescribers. There was some good practice where both parties reported good quality conversations concerning dialogic styles, collaborative process, information provided and range of choice offered. However, prescriber's perception of their practice was not always mirrored by service user feedback whose experiences often depended upon the prescriber, the time available or the part of the service. Generally, service user experience fell short of the good practice cited by clinicians though there was noticeable variability. Commitment from organizations and increasing understanding from practitioners are vital in transforming SDM from rhetoric into reality. From our findings a further challenge is to ensure that prescribers and service users have the time, information and tools to implement it consistently.

摘要

个性化护理涉及各级别的共同决策(SDM),包括药物选择。然而,有许多障碍阻碍了其在常规心理健康环境中的有效实施。因此,我们进行了一项研究,以对大型城市心理健康服务提供商的临床服务进行当前实践基准测试。该研究是信托范围内“药物共同决策支持”共同制定项目的一部分,旨在为提供当代最佳实践、指南和政策提供信息。在伦敦西部 NHS 信托中,进行了一项调查,以探索服务使用者和处方者对药物共同和支持决策的看法和经验。问卷由一组医疗保健专业人员和有生活经验的个人共同完全设计和提供。有 100 名服务使用者和 35 名处方者做出了回应。在对话风格、协作过程、提供的信息和提供的选择范围方面,双方都有一些良好的实践经验。然而,处方者对其实践的看法并不总是反映服务使用者的反馈,服务使用者的经验往往取决于处方者、可用时间或服务的一部分。一般来说,服务使用者的体验不如临床医生提到的良好实践,尽管存在明显的差异。组织的承诺和从业者的理解增加对于将 SDM 从空谈转变为现实至关重要。根据我们的发现,进一步的挑战是确保处方者和服务使用者有时间、信息和工具来一致地实施它。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaba/8531065/eae65a4383ea/10597_2021_780_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaba/8531065/75fb514ef8ab/10597_2021_780_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaba/8531065/487ed0d4fd72/10597_2021_780_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaba/8531065/6ad7b78ef69a/10597_2021_780_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaba/8531065/9aee84d46037/10597_2021_780_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaba/8531065/8300ba126472/10597_2021_780_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaba/8531065/7c801110fb5e/10597_2021_780_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaba/8531065/eae65a4383ea/10597_2021_780_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaba/8531065/75fb514ef8ab/10597_2021_780_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaba/8531065/487ed0d4fd72/10597_2021_780_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaba/8531065/6ad7b78ef69a/10597_2021_780_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaba/8531065/9aee84d46037/10597_2021_780_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaba/8531065/8300ba126472/10597_2021_780_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaba/8531065/7c801110fb5e/10597_2021_780_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaba/8531065/eae65a4383ea/10597_2021_780_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Shared and Supported Decision Making in Medication in a Mental Health Setting: How Far Have We Come?精神卫生环境中的药物共享和共同决策:我们已经走了多远?
Community Ment Health J. 2021 Nov;57(8):1566-1578. doi: 10.1007/s10597-021-00780-2. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
2
A meta-ethnography of shared decision-making in mental health care from the perspective of staff and service users.从工作人员和服务使用者的角度对精神卫生保健中的共同决策进行的元民族志研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1142. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11540-9.
3
Exploring the potential implementation of a tool to enhance shared decision making (SDM) in mental health services in the United Kingdom: a qualitative exploration of the views of service users, carers and professionals.探索在英国心理健康服务中增强共同决策(SDM)工具的潜在实施情况:对服务使用者、护理人员和专业人员观点的定性探索。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2017 Jun 28;11:42. doi: 10.1186/s13033-017-0149-z. eCollection 2017.
4
Supported decision-making interventions in mental healthcare: A systematic review of current evidence and implementation barriers.精神卫生保健中的支持性决策干预措施:当前证据及实施障碍的系统评价
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14001. doi: 10.1111/hex.14001.
5
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
6
Shared decision-making for psychiatric medication: A mixed-methods evaluation of a UK training programme for service users and clinicians.精神药物共享决策:一项针对服务使用者和临床医生的英国培训计划的混合方法评估。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2017 Dec;63(8):763-772. doi: 10.1177/0020764017733764. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
7
Shared Decision-Making: An Autoethnography About Service User Perspectives in Making Choices About Mental Health Care and Treatment.共同决策:一篇关于服务使用者在选择精神卫生保健和治疗时观点的自我民族志。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 10;12:637560. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.637560. eCollection 2021.
8
Shared Decision Making in a Youth Mental Health Service Design and Research Project: Insights From the Pan-Canadian ACCESS Open Minds Network.在青少年心理健康服务设计和研究项目中进行共同决策:泛加ACCESS 开放思维网络的见解。
Patient. 2020 Dec;13(6):653-666. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00444-5.
9
Shared decision-making in the treatment of adolescents diagnosed with depression: A cross-sectional survey of mental health professionals in China.中国青少年抑郁症治疗中的共享决策:精神卫生专业人员的横断面调查。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Jun;31(3):340-351. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12990. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
10
Adapting a social network intervention for use in secondary mental health services using a collaborative approach with service users, carers/supporters and health professionals in the United Kingdom.采用协作方式,联合英国的服务使用者、护理人员/支持者和卫生专业人员,对一个社交网络干预措施进行改编,将其用于二级精神卫生服务。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 9;22(1):1140. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08521-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Preferences for Decision-Making Style and Knowledge of and Attitudes To Recovery in Mental Health Professionals Working in Inpatient and Outpatient Settings in Routine Mental Health Practice: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study in the Danish Mental Health Services.常规精神卫生实践中住院和门诊环境下精神卫生专业人员的决策风格偏好以及对康复的认知和态度:丹麦精神卫生服务机构的一项探索性横断面研究
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Sep 13. doi: 10.1007/s10488-025-01472-9.
2
Comparative effectiveness of long-acting injectable antipsychotics in a large naturalistic cohort across two European centers: Findings from the long-acting injectable antipsychotics collaborative (LAICO) study.长效注射用抗精神病药物在两个欧洲中心大型自然队列中的比较疗效:长效注射用抗精神病药物协作研究(LAICO)的结果
Neurosci Appl. 2022 Oct 8;1:100111. doi: 10.1016/j.nsa.2022.100111. eCollection 2022.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Reflections, impact and recommendations of a co-produced qualitative study with young people who have experience of mental health difficulties.与有心理健康困难经历的年轻人共同开展的定性研究的反思、影响和建议。
Health Expect. 2021 May;24 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):134-146. doi: 10.1111/hex.13088. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
2
Making decisions about antipsychotics: a qualitative study of patient experience and the development of a decision aid.抗精神病药物决策:一项关于患者体验和决策辅助工具开发的定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 23;19(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2304-3.
3
Use and reporting of experience-based codesign studies in the healthcare setting: a systematic review.
Long-term outcomes of Aripiprazole long-acting injectable: a 10-year mirror image study of patient acceptability and treatment effectiveness.阿立哌唑长效注射剂的长期疗效:一项关于患者接受度和治疗效果的10年镜像研究
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2025 Jun 23;11(1):92. doi: 10.1038/s41537-025-00637-7.
4
One-Year Evaluation of Paliperidone Palmitate 6-Monthly: Satisfaction and Perceived Effectiveness Among Patients, Relatives, and Clinicians.棕榈酸帕利哌酮每6个月一次的一年期评估:患者、家属和临床医生的满意度及感知疗效
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 May 28;19:1573-1582. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S517038. eCollection 2025.
5
Exploring Patient, Caregiver, and Prescriber Preferences for an Injectable Antipsychotic Administered Every 2 Months for the Maintenance Treatment of Schizophrenia: A Multicenter Qualitative Interview Study Conducted in Europe.探索患者、照料者及处方医生对每两个月注射一次的抗精神病药物用于精神分裂症维持治疗的偏好:一项在欧洲开展的多中心定性访谈研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Apr 29;19:1179-1195. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S520160. eCollection 2025.
6
Long-term effectiveness, adherence and safety of twice-yearly paliperidone-palmitate long acting-injectable in patients with schizophrenia in Europe: 2-year mirror-image data from the paliperdone-2 per year study (P2Y).长效注射用帕利哌酮棕榈酸酯每半年一次给药方案在欧洲精神分裂症患者中的长期疗效、依从性及安全性:来自帕利哌酮每年两次研究(P2Y)的2年镜像数据
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 4;16:1540213. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1540213. eCollection 2025.
7
Transdiagnostic clustering and network analysis for questionnaire-based symptom profiling and drug recommendation in the UK Biobank and a Korean cohort.基于问卷的症状分析和药物推荐的英国生物库和韩国队列的跨诊断聚类和网络分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 24;14(1):4500. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49490-7.
8
Autoethnographic Reflections on Mental Distress and Medication Management: Conceptualising Biomedical and Recovery Models of Mental Health.关于精神困扰与药物管理的自我民族志反思:构建心理健康的生物医学与康复模式
Community Ment Health J. 2025 Feb;61(2):213-220. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01230-5. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
9
Preliminary data from a 4-year mirror-image and multicentre study of patients initiating paliperidone palmitate 6-monthly long-acting injectable antipsychotic: the Paliperidone 2 per Year study.一项针对开始使用棕榈酸帕利哌酮每6个月长效注射用抗精神病药物的患者进行的为期4年的镜像多中心研究的初步数据:每年2次帕利哌酮研究。
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2023 Dec 26;13:20451253231220907. doi: 10.1177/20451253231220907. eCollection 2023.
10
Cumulative Clinical Experience of the Use of Paliperidone Palmitate 3-Monthly Long-Acting Injection in the Treatment of Schizophrenia: A Critical Appraisal.使用棕榈酸帕利哌酮三个月长效注射剂治疗精神分裂症的累积临床经验:一项批判性评估。
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2023 Sep 12;15:113-123. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S339170. eCollection 2023.
在医疗保健环境中使用和报告基于经验的共同设计研究:系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Jan;29(1):64-76. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009570. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
4
Young adults' perceptions of using wearables, social media and other technologies to detect worsening mental health: A qualitative study.年轻人对使用可穿戴设备、社交媒体和其他技术来检测心理健康恶化的看法:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 18;14(9):e0222655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222655. eCollection 2019.
5
Implementing a digital clinical decision support tool for side effects of antipsychotics: a focus group study.实施抗精神病药副作用的数字化临床决策支持工具:一项焦点小组研究。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2019 May;22(2):56-60. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2019-300086. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
6
Experiences of in-patient mental health services: systematic review.住院精神卫生服务体验:系统评价。
Br J Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;214(6):329-338. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.22. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
7
The potential for coproduction to add value to research.共同生产为研究增值的潜力。
Health Expect. 2018 Aug;21(4):693-694. doi: 10.1111/hex.12821.
8
Shared decision-making for psychiatric medication: A mixed-methods evaluation of a UK training programme for service users and clinicians.精神药物共享决策:一项针对服务使用者和临床医生的英国培训计划的混合方法评估。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2017 Dec;63(8):763-772. doi: 10.1177/0020764017733764. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
9
Shared decision-making in medication management: development of a training intervention.药物管理中的共同决策:一种培训干预措施的开发
BJPsych Bull. 2017 Aug;41(4):221-227. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.116.053819.
10
A web-based clinical decision tool to support treatment decision-making in psychiatry: a pilot focus group study with clinicians, patients and carers.一种支持精神病学治疗决策的基于网络的临床决策工具:一项针对临床医生、患者和护理人员的试点焦点小组研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 21;17(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1406-z.