Fox Joanna
School of Education and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 10;12:637560. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.637560. eCollection 2021.
Shared decision-making (SDM) between mental health medication prescribers and service users is a central pillar in the recovery approach, because it supports people experiencing mental ill-health to explore their care and treatment options to promote their well-being and to enable clinicians to gain knowledge of the choices the service user prefers. SDM is receiving increasing recognition both in the delivery of physical and mental health services; and as such, is of significance to current practice. As an expert-by-experience with over 30 years of receiving mental health treatment, I have made many choices about taking medication and accessing other forms of support. The experiences of SDM have been variable over my career as a service user: both encounters when I have felt utterly disempowered and interactions when I have led decision-making process based on my expertise-by-experience. In this article, I recount two experiences of exploring care and treatment options: firstly, a discharge planning meeting; and secondly, the choice to take medication over the long-term, despite the side effects. The article will explore both opportunities and barriers to effective shared decision-making, as well as skills and processes to facilitate this approach. The need to balance power between service users and professionals in this interaction is highlighted, including the need to respect expertise built on lived experience, alongside that of clinical expertise. This narrative is framed within an autoethnographic approach which allows me to contextualize my personal experiences in the wider environment of mental health care and support.
精神健康药物开方者与服务使用者之间的共同决策(SDM)是康复方法的核心支柱,因为它支持患有精神疾病的人探索其护理和治疗选择,以促进他们的福祉,并使临床医生了解服务使用者更喜欢的选择。共同决策在提供身心健康服务方面正日益受到认可;因此,它对当前的实践具有重要意义。作为一名有超过30年接受精神健康治疗经历的亲历者,我在服药和获得其他形式的支持方面做出了许多选择。在我作为服务使用者的职业生涯中,共同决策的经历各不相同:既有让我感到完全无力的情况,也有我凭借自身经历主导决策过程的互动。在本文中,我讲述了探索护理和治疗选择的两次经历:一是出院计划会议;二是尽管有副作用仍选择长期服药。本文将探讨有效共同决策的机遇和障碍,以及促进这种方法的技能和流程。强调了在这种互动中平衡服务使用者和专业人员之间权力的必要性,包括尊重基于生活经历建立的专业知识以及临床专业知识。这个叙述是以自我民族志的方法构建的,它使我能够将个人经历置于精神健康护理和支持的更广泛背景中。