• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结合点击流分析和基于图模型的数据聚类来识别常见的反应过程。

Combining Clickstream Analyses and Graph-Modeled Data Clustering for Identifying Common Response Processes.

机构信息

Educational Measurement, IPN - Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, Olshausenstraße 62, 24118,  Kiel, Germany.

Educational Testing Service, Princeton, USA.

出版信息

Psychometrika. 2021 Mar;86(1):190-214. doi: 10.1007/s11336-020-09743-0. Epub 2021 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1007/s11336-020-09743-0
PMID:33544300
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8035117/
Abstract

Complex interactive test items are becoming more widely used in assessments. Being computer-administered, assessments using interactive items allow logging time-stamped action sequences. These sequences pose a rich source of information that may facilitate investigating how examinees approach an item and arrive at their given response. There is a rich body of research leveraging action sequence data for investigating examinees' behavior. However, the associated timing data have been considered mainly on the item-level, if at all. Considering timing data on the action-level in addition to action sequences, however, has vast potential to support a more fine-grained assessment of examinees' behavior. We provide an approach that jointly considers action sequences and action-level times for identifying common response processes. In doing so, we integrate tools from clickstream analyses and graph-modeled data clustering with psychometrics. In our approach, we (a) provide similarity measures that are based on both actions and the associated action-level timing data and (b) subsequently employ cluster edge deletion for identifying homogeneous, interpretable, well-separated groups of action patterns, each describing a common response process. Guidelines on how to apply the approach are provided. The approach and its utility are illustrated on a complex problem-solving item from PIAAC 2012.

摘要

复杂的互动测试项目在评估中越来越多地被使用。采用互动项目的计算机化评估允许记录时间标记的动作序列。这些序列提供了丰富的信息来源,可以帮助研究考生如何处理项目并得出他们的给定答案。有大量的研究利用动作序列数据来研究考生的行为。然而,相关的计时数据如果有的话,主要也只在项目级别上进行考虑。然而,除了动作序列之外,在动作级别上考虑计时数据,具有极大的潜力来支持对考生行为进行更精细的评估。我们提供了一种方法,该方法联合考虑动作序列和动作级别的时间,以识别常见的反应过程。在这样做的过程中,我们将点击流分析和基于图形模型的数据聚类工具与心理计量学相结合。在我们的方法中,我们(a)提供了基于动作和相关动作级别的计时数据的相似性度量,以及(b)随后采用簇边删除来识别同质的、可解释的、分离良好的动作模式组,每个模式组都描述了一个常见的反应过程。提供了应用该方法的指南。该方法及其效用在 2012 年 PIAAC 的一个复杂的解决问题的项目中得到了说明。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c520/8035117/08ad8af85231/11336_2020_9743_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c520/8035117/9e3094159fbb/11336_2020_9743_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c520/8035117/8848763fd7c0/11336_2020_9743_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c520/8035117/6b188477eb85/11336_2020_9743_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c520/8035117/7dd1da22bf2b/11336_2020_9743_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c520/8035117/08ad8af85231/11336_2020_9743_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c520/8035117/9e3094159fbb/11336_2020_9743_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c520/8035117/8848763fd7c0/11336_2020_9743_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c520/8035117/6b188477eb85/11336_2020_9743_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c520/8035117/7dd1da22bf2b/11336_2020_9743_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c520/8035117/08ad8af85231/11336_2020_9743_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Combining Clickstream Analyses and Graph-Modeled Data Clustering for Identifying Common Response Processes.结合点击流分析和基于图模型的数据聚类来识别常见的反应过程。
Psychometrika. 2021 Mar;86(1):190-214. doi: 10.1007/s11336-020-09743-0. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
2
A machine learning-based procedure for leveraging clickstream data to investigate early predictability of failure on interactive tasks.一种基于机器学习的方法,利用点击流数据研究交互式任务中早期失败的可预测性。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Apr;55(3):1392-1412. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01844-1. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
3
Subtask analysis of process data through a predictive model.通过预测模型对过程数据进行子任务分析。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2023 Feb;76(1):211-235. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12290. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
A latent topic model with Markov transition for process data.具有马尔可夫转换的过程数据潜在主题模型。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2020 Nov;73(3):474-505. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12197. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
6
ProcData: An R Package for Process Data Analysis.ProcData:一个用于过程数据分析的 R 包。
Psychometrika. 2021 Dec;86(4):1058-1083. doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09798-7. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
7
Biclustering of Log Data: Insights from a Computer-Based Complex Problem Solving Assessment.日志数据的双聚类分析:基于计算机的复杂问题解决评估的见解
J Intell. 2024 Jan 17;12(1):10. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12010010.
8
DIAGNOSTIC Classification Analysis of Problem-Solving Competence using Process Data: An Item Expansion Method.使用过程数据对问题解决能力进行诊断分类分析:一种项目扩展方法。
Psychometrika. 2022 Dec;87(4):1529-1547. doi: 10.1007/s11336-022-09855-9. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
9
Mapping Background Variables With Sequential Patterns in Problem-Solving Environments: An Investigation of United States Adults' Employment Status in PIAAC.在问题解决环境中利用序列模式映射背景变量:对美国成年人在国际成人能力评估项目(PIAAC)中的就业状况的调查
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 27;10:646. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00646. eCollection 2019.
10
Joint modeling of action sequences and action time in computer-based interactive tasks.基于计算机的交互式任务中动作序列和动作时间的联合建模。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Aug;56(5):4293-4310. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02178-2. Epub 2023 Jul 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Evidence to Interpret Differential Item Functioning via Response Process Data.通过反应过程数据探索解释项目功能差异的证据。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Nov 29:00131644241298975. doi: 10.1177/00131644241298975.
2
Biclustering of Log Data: Insights from a Computer-Based Complex Problem Solving Assessment.日志数据的双聚类分析:基于计算机的复杂问题解决评估的见解
J Intell. 2024 Jan 17;12(1):10. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12010010.
3
Investigating Planning and Non-Targeted Exploration in PIAAC 2012: Validating Their Measures Based on Process Data and Investigating Their Relationships with Problem-Solving Competency.

本文引用的文献

1
Subtask analysis of process data through a predictive model.通过预测模型对过程数据进行子任务分析。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2023 Feb;76(1):211-235. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12290. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
2
Latent Feature Extraction for Process Data via Multidimensional Scaling.基于多维尺度分析的过程数据潜在特征提取。
Psychometrika. 2020 Jun;85(2):378-397. doi: 10.1007/s11336-020-09708-3. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
3
An exploratory analysis of the latent structure of process data via action sequence autoencoders.通过动作序列自动编码器对过程数据的潜在结构进行探索性分析。
探究2012年国际成人能力评估项目(PIAAC)中的规划与非定向探索:基于过程数据验证其测量方法并探究它们与问题解决能力的关系。
J Intell. 2023 Aug 7;11(8):156. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11080156.
4
Joint modeling of action sequences and action time in computer-based interactive tasks.基于计算机的交互式任务中动作序列和动作时间的联合建模。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Aug;56(5):4293-4310. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02178-2. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
5
Understanding students' problem-solving patterns: Evidence from an allotted response time in a PISA 2012 item.理解学生的问题解决模式:来自2012年国际学生评估项目(PISA)一道题目的规定作答时间的证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 4;13:1050435. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1050435. eCollection 2022.
6
Editorial: Process Data in Educational and Psychological Measurement.社论:教育与心理测量中的过程数据
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 3;12:793399. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.793399. eCollection 2021.
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2021 Feb;74(1):1-33. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12203. Epub 2020 May 22.
4
A hierarchical latent response model for inferences about examinee engagement in terms of guessing and item-level non-response.一种分层潜在反应模型,用于根据猜测和项目水平非响应推断考生的参与度。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2020 Nov;73 Suppl 1:83-112. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12188. Epub 2019 Nov 10.
5
Using Response Times for Joint Modeling of Response and Omission Behavior.使用反应时联合建模反应和遗漏行为。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2020 May-Jun;55(3):425-453. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2019.1643699. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
6
Collaborative Problem Solving: Processing Actions, Time, and Performance.协作式问题解决:处理行动、时间和绩效。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 7;10:1280. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01280. eCollection 2019.
7
Taking a Closer Look: An Exploratory Analysis of Successful and Unsuccessful Strategy Use in Complex Problems.深入探究:复杂问题中成功与失败策略运用的探索性分析
Front Psychol. 2019 May 7;10:777. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00777. eCollection 2019.
8
Mapping Background Variables With Sequential Patterns in Problem-Solving Environments: An Investigation of United States Adults' Employment Status in PIAAC.在问题解决环境中利用序列模式映射背景变量:对美国成年人在国际成人能力评估项目(PIAAC)中的就业状况的调查
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 27;10:646. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00646. eCollection 2019.
9
Statistical Analysis of Complex Problem-Solving Process Data: An Event History Analysis Approach.复杂问题解决过程数据的统计分析:一种事件历史分析方法。
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 18;10:486. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00486. eCollection 2019.
10
An Overview of Models for Response Times and Processes in Cognitive Tests.认知测试中反应时间与过程的模型概述
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 6;10:102. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00102. eCollection 2019.