College of Education, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, EDU 105, Tampa, FL, 33620, USA.
College of Education, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Prev Sci. 2021 Aug;22(6):811-825. doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01204-z. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
The paper describes the applicability and acceptability of a selective intervention-Motivation, Assessment, and Planning (MAP)-for high school students that was developed based on the principles of motivational interviewing (MI) and tailored to the unique needs and strengths of students taking accelerated coursework, specifically Advanced Placement (AP) and International Baccalaureate (IB) classes. In addition to detailing the intervention in terms of MI spirit, processes, and relational and technical skills, we report applicability and acceptability data from a second iteration of MAP implementation in eight AP/IB programs in a Southeastern state during spring 2018. We analyzed quantitative and qualitative acceptability data from 121 high school freshmen (97 from AP and 24 from IB courses), as well as the seven MAP coaches who were trained using the Motivational Interview Training and Assessment System (Frey et al. 2017). To gain perspectives from the intended end users of the refined MAP, 12 school counselors and school psychologists who were not trained in MAP evaluated the intervention and provided qualitative and quantitative data on applicability and acceptability. All three stakeholder groups (students, coaches, and school mental health staff) rated and described the intervention as highly acceptable and appropriate for addressing the social-emotional needs of adolescents in AP/IB classes.
本文介绍了一种基于动机访谈(MI)原则并针对参加加速课程(特别是高级课程(AP)和国际文凭课程(IB)的学生的独特需求和优势量身定制的选择性干预措施——动机、评估和计划(MAP)在高中生中的适用性和可接受性。除了详细介绍干预措施在 MI 精神、过程以及关系和技术技能方面的细节外,我们还报告了 2018 年春季在东南部一个州的八个 AP/IB 项目中实施 MAP 的第二轮迭代的适用性和可接受性数据。我们分析了来自 121 名高中新生(97 名来自 AP 课程,24 名来自 IB 课程)以及 7 名接受过使用动机访谈培训和评估系统(Frey 等人,2017)培训的 MAP 教练的定量和定性可接受性数据。为了从精炼后的 MAP 的预期最终用户那里获得观点,12 名学校辅导员和学校心理学家(他们没有接受过 MAP 培训)评估了干预措施,并提供了适用性和可接受性的定性和定量数据。所有三个利益相关者群体(学生、教练和学校心理健康工作人员)都对干预措施进行了评分,并描述了该干预措施非常适合解决 AP/IB 课程中青少年的社会情感需求。