• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PEC 指数在欧洲和韩国晚期胆道癌患者中检测的新指标的预后作用。

Prognostic Role of a New Index Tested in European and Korean Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Patients: the PECS Index.

机构信息

Division of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.

Division of Medical Oncology, ASL BI, Nuovo Ospedale Degli Infermi, Ponderano, Italy.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Cancer. 2022 Jun;53(2):289-298. doi: 10.1007/s12029-021-00596-z. Epub 2021 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1007/s12029-021-00596-z
PMID:33544375
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The aim of the present study is to evaluate a new index (PECS (PsECogSii)index) influenced by PS ECOG and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) in unresectable locally advanced or metastatic BTC patients treated with first-line chemotherapy.

METHODS

This multicenter, international, study was conducted on a training cohort of 130 patients and in three European and Korean validation cohorts The PECS index was calculated as ECOG × SII index (neutrophil count × platelet count/lymphocyte count). Event-time distributions were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and survival curves were compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

In the training cohort, the median overall survival (mOS) was 13.2 months, 8.7 months, and 3.8 months for patients with PECS-0, PECS-1, and PECS-2, respectively (PECS-0: HR = 1; PECS-1: HR 1.41; PECS-2: HR 3.23) (p < 0.0001). In the first validation cohort, the mOS was 12.8 months, 10.1 months, and 5.3 months for patients with PECS-0, PECS-1, and PECS-2, respectively (PECS-0: HR = 1; PECS-1: HR 1.29; PECS-2: HR 2.40) (p < 0.0001). In the second validation cohort, the mOS was 21.2 months, 10.2 months, and 3.0 months for patients with PECS-0, PECS-1, and PECS-2, respectively (PECS-0: HR = 1; PECS-1: HR 2.25; PECS-2: HR 9.00) (p < 0.0001). In the third validation cohort, the median OS was 15.5 months, 7.5 months, and 3.7 months for patients with PECS-0, PECS-1, and PECS-2, respectively (PECS-0: ref HR = 1; PECS-1: HR 2.14; PECS-2: HR 5.00) (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis in all cohorts confirmed the PECS index as an independent prognostic factor for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The easy assessment, low cost, and reproducibility make PECS index a promising tool to assess the prognosis of BTC patients in future clinical practice.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在评估一种新的指数(PECS(PsECogSii)指数),该指数受 PS ECOG 和全身免疫炎症指数(SII)的影响,用于评估接受一线化疗的不可切除局部晚期或转移性 BTC 患者的预后。

方法

这是一项多中心、国际研究,在一个 130 例患者的训练队列和三个欧洲和韩国验证队列中进行。PECS 指数的计算方法为 ECOG×SII 指数(中性粒细胞计数×血小板计数/淋巴细胞计数)。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法估计事件时间分布,采用对数秩检验比较生存曲线。

结果

在训练队列中,PECS-0、PECS-1 和 PECS-2 组的中位总生存期(mOS)分别为 13.2 个月、8.7 个月和 3.8 个月(PECS-0:HR=1;PECS-1:HR 1.41;PECS-2:HR 3.23)(p<0.0001)。在第一个验证队列中,PECS-0、PECS-1 和 PECS-2 组的 mOS 分别为 12.8 个月、10.1 个月和 5.3 个月(PECS-0:HR=1;PECS-1:HR 1.29;PECS-2:HR 2.40)(p<0.0001)。在第二个验证队列中,PECS-0、PECS-1 和 PECS-2 组的 mOS 分别为 21.2 个月、10.2 个月和 3.0 个月(PECS-0:HR=1;PECS-1:HR 2.25;PECS-2:HR 9.00)(p<0.0001)。在第三个验证队列中,PECS-0、PECS-1 和 PECS-2 组的中位 OS 分别为 15.5 个月、7.5 个月和 3.7 个月(PECS-0:ref HR=1;PECS-1:HR 2.14;PECS-2:HR 5.00)(p<0.0001)。所有队列的多变量分析均证实 PECS 指数是 OS 的独立预后因素。

结论

该指数易于评估、成本低且可重复性好,有望成为未来临床实践中评估 BTC 患者预后的一种有前途的工具。

相似文献

1
Prognostic Role of a New Index Tested in European and Korean Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Patients: the PECS Index.PEC 指数在欧洲和韩国晚期胆道癌患者中检测的新指标的预后作用。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2022 Jun;53(2):289-298. doi: 10.1007/s12029-021-00596-z. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
2
A Novel Prognostic Tool in Western and Eastern Biliary Tract Cancer Patients Treated in First-line Setting: the ECSIPOT Index.一种新型的预后工具:ECSIPOT 指数,用于评估一线治疗的东西方胆道癌患者。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2022 Sep;53(3):528-536. doi: 10.1007/s12029-021-00649-3. Epub 2021 May 25.
3
The A.L.A.N. score identifies prognostic classes in advanced biliary cancer patients receiving first-line chemotherapy.A.L.A.N. 评分可识别一线化疗的晚期胆道癌患者的预后类别。
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Aug;117:84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.05.030. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
4
Real-life analysis of treatment approaches and the role of inflammatory markers on survival in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.晚期胆管癌患者治疗方法及炎症标志物对生存影响的真实世界分析
Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Oct;38(10):1751-1758. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2108619. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
5
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and their dynamic changes during chemotherapy is useful to predict a more accurate prognosis of advanced biliary tract cancer.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、血小板与淋巴细胞比值及其在化疗期间的动态变化有助于更准确地预测晚期胆管癌的预后。
Oncotarget. 2017 Jan 10;8(2):2329-2341. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13731.
6
The Value of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index in Predicting Survival Outcomes in Patients with Brain Metastases of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Stereotactic Radiotherapy.系统免疫炎症指数在预测接受立体定向放疗的非小细胞肺癌脑转移患者生存结局中的价值。
Mediators Inflamm. 2021 Oct 29;2021:2910892. doi: 10.1155/2021/2910892. eCollection 2021.
7
Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in biliary tract cancer.中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值作为胆道癌的预后因素。
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Jun;50(9):1581-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.02.015. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
8
Systemic immune-inflammation index, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio can predict clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab.系统免疫炎症指数、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、血小板与淋巴细胞比值可预测纳武利尤单抗治疗转移性非小细胞肺癌患者的临床结局。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2019 Oct;33(8):e22964. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22964. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
9
Soluble programmed death-ligand 1 (sPDL1) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) predicts survival in advanced biliary tract cancer patients treated with palliative chemotherapy.可溶性程序性死亡配体1(sPDL1)和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)可预测接受姑息化疗的晚期胆管癌患者的生存率。
Oncotarget. 2016 Nov 22;7(47):76604-76612. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12810.
10
Prognostic role of the systemic immune-inflammation index in biliary tract cancers: a meta-analysis of 3,515 patients.系统免疫炎症指数在胆道癌中的预后作用:3515 例患者的荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Sep 29;20(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02783-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Detecting the preoperative peripheral blood systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) as a tool for early diagnosis and prognosis of gallbladder cancer.检测术前外周血全身免疫炎症指数(SII)作为胆囊癌早期诊断和预后评估的工具。
BMC Immunol. 2025 Feb 18;26(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12865-025-00683-x.
2
Prognostic and clinical pathological significance of the systemic immune-inflammation index in urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全身免疫炎症指数在尿路上皮癌中的预后及临床病理意义:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2024 Mar 26;14:1322897. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1322897. eCollection 2024.
3
Development of a nomogram to predict survival in advanced biliary tract cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Immune inflammation indicators in anal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation: training and validation cohort with online calculator (ARC: Anal Cancer Response Classifier).同步放化疗治疗的肛管癌患者的免疫炎症指标:使用在线计算器的训练和验证队列(ARC:肛管癌反应分类器)
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Apr 26;11:3631-3642. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S197349. eCollection 2019.
2
Cancer statistics, 2019.癌症统计数据,2019 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
3
Immune inflammation indicators and ALBI score to predict liver cancer in HCV-patients treated with direct-acting antivirals.
开发一个列线图预测晚期胆道癌的生存情况。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 6;13(1):21548. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48889-6.
4
INTS8 is a therapeutic target for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma via the integration of bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation.INTS8 是通过生物信息学分析和实验验证整合的肝内胆管癌治疗靶点。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 8;11(1):23649. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03017-0.
免疫炎症指标和 ALBI 评分预测 HCV 患者经直接作用抗病毒药物治疗后的肝癌。
Dig Liver Dis. 2019 May;51(5):681-688. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.09.016. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
4
Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of overall survival and recurrence-free survival.肝细胞癌的射频消融:总生存期和无复发生存期的荟萃分析
Onco Targets Ther. 2018 Oct 5;11:6555-6567. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S170836. eCollection 2018.
5
Predictive factors of the treatment outcome in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer receiving gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy.吉西他滨联合顺铂一线化疗治疗晚期胆道癌患者的疗效预测因素。
J Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar;54(3):281-290. doi: 10.1007/s00535-018-1518-3. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
6
Early versus late recurrence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection with curative intent.根治性切除术后肝内胆管细胞癌早期与晚期复发。
Br J Surg. 2018 Jun;105(7):848-856. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10676. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
7
Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and Circulating T-Cell Immune Index Predict Outcomes in High-Risk Acral Melanoma Patients Treated with High-Dose Interferon.全身免疫炎症指数和循环T细胞免疫指数预测接受高剂量干扰素治疗的高危肢端黑色素瘤患者的预后。
Transl Oncol. 2017 Oct;10(5):719-725. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
8
A novel systemic immune-inflammation index predicts survival and quality of life of patients after curative resection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.一种新型全身免疫炎症指数可预测食管鳞状细胞癌根治性切除术后患者的生存率和生活质量。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct;143(10):2077-2086. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2451-1. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
9
Prognostic factors in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer treated with first-line gemcitabine plus cisplatin: retrospective analysis of 740 patients.一线吉西他滨联合顺铂治疗晚期胆管癌患者的预后因素:740例患者的回顾性分析
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017 Jul;80(1):209-215. doi: 10.1007/s00280-017-3353-2. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
10
Prognostic Factors and Scoring Model for Survival in Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer.转移性胆道癌生存的预后因素和评分模型。
Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Oct;49(4):1127-1139. doi: 10.4143/crt.2016.538. Epub 2017 Feb 6.