Laboratario de Estudios Cristalograficos, Instituto Andaluz de Ciencias de la Tierra, CSIC-Universidad de Granada, Armilla, Spain.
Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Université de Paris, CNRS UMR 7154, Paris, France.
Astrobiology. 2021 Feb;21(2):151-164. doi: 10.1089/ast.2020.2282. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
The search for signs of life in the ancient rock record, extreme terrestrial environments, and other planetary bodies requires a well-established, universal, and unambiguous test of biogenicity. This is notably true for cellular remnants of microbial life, since their relatively simple morphologies resemble various abiogenic microstructures that occur in nature. Although lists of qualitative biogenicity criteria have been devised, debates regarding the biogenicity of many ancient microfossils persist to this day. We propose here an alternative quantitative approach for assessing the biogenicity of putative microfossils. In this theoretical approach, different hypotheses-involving biology or not and depending on the geologic setting-are put forward to explain the observed objects. These hypotheses correspond to specific types of microstructures/systems. Using test samples, the morphology and/or chemistry of these systems are then characterized at the scale of populations. Morphologic parameters include, for example, circularity, aspect ratio, and solidity, while chemical parameters could include elementary ratios (, N/C ratio), isotopic enrichments (, δ13C), or chirality (, molar proportion of stereoisomers), among others. Statistic trends distinguishing the different systems are then searched for empirically. The trends found are translated into "decision spaces" where the different systems are quantitatively discriminated and where the potential microfossil population can be located as a single point. This approach, which is formulated here on a theoretical level, will solve several problems associated with the classical qualitative criteria of biogenicity. Most importantly, it could be applied to reveal the existence of cellular life on other planets, for which characteristics of morphology and chemical composition are difficult to predict.
在古代岩石记录、极端陆地环境和其他行星体中寻找生命迹象,需要一种成熟的、通用的、明确的生物标志物测试方法。对于微生物生命的细胞残留物来说尤其如此,因为它们相对简单的形态类似于自然界中存在的各种非生物微观结构。虽然已经设计出了定性生物标志物标准的清单,但关于许多古代微化石的生物性的争论至今仍在继续。在这里,我们提出了一种评估疑似微化石生物性的替代定量方法。在这种理论方法中,根据地质背景,提出了涉及生物学或不涉及生物学的不同假设来解释所观察到的物体。这些假设对应于特定类型的微观结构/系统。然后,使用测试样本,对这些系统的形态和/或化学性质在群体尺度上进行特征描述。形态参数包括例如圆度、纵横比和实心度,而化学参数可能包括元素比(例如,N/C 比)、同位素丰度(例如,δ13C)或手性(例如,立体异构体的摩尔比例)等。然后,通过经验搜索区分不同系统的统计趋势。找到的趋势被转化为“决策空间”,在该空间中,不同的系统可以进行定量区分,并且潜在的微化石群体可以作为一个点进行定位。这种方法在理论层面上进行了阐述,它解决了与生物标志物定性标准相关的几个问题。最重要的是,它可以应用于揭示其他行星上细胞生命的存在,因为这些行星上的形态和化学成分特征很难预测。