• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证一种预测计算器,以区分表现为分离性发作与癫痫性发作的患者。

Validation of a predictive calculator to distinguish between patients presenting with dissociative versus epileptic seizures.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.

Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Mar;116:107767. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.107767. Epub 2021 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.107767
PMID:33545649
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7951947/
Abstract

Dissociative seizures (also known as psychogenic nonepileptic seizures) are a common functional neurological disorder that can be difficult to distinguish from epileptic seizures. Patients with dissociative seizures provide diagnostic challenges, leading to delays in care, inappropriate care, and significant healthcare utilization and associated costs. The dissociative seizure likelihood score (DSLS) was developed by Kerr and colleagues at UCLA to distinguish between patients with epileptic seizures and dissociative seizures based on clinical and medication history as well as features of seizure semiology. We validated this calculator at the University of Colorado, which is a Level 4 National Association of Epilepsy Center. The DSLS accurately predicted the diagnosis in 81% of patients, despite local variability in the factors associated with epileptic versus dissociative seizures between the two populations. The DSLS can be a useful tool to assist with history taking and may have important utility for clinical decision making with these difficult to distinguish patient populations.

摘要

分离性发作(也称为心因性非癫痫性发作)是一种常见的功能性神经障碍,很难与癫痫发作区分开来。分离性发作患者带来诊断挑战,导致治疗延误、治疗不当,以及大量的医疗保健利用和相关费用。UCLA 的 Kerr 及其同事开发了分离性发作可能性评分(DSLS),以根据临床和用药史以及发作症状学特征,区分癫痫发作和分离性发作患者。我们在科罗拉多大学进行了该计算器的验证,科罗拉多大学是国家癫痫中心四级协会的成员。尽管两个群体中与癫痫发作和分离性发作相关的因素存在局部差异,但 DSLS 在 81%的患者中准确预测了诊断。DSLS 可以成为辅助采集病史的有用工具,对于这些难以区分的患者群体的临床决策可能具有重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4858/7951947/eb8f42ca347a/nihms-1662688-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4858/7951947/13ad962f1c9b/nihms-1662688-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4858/7951947/eb8f42ca347a/nihms-1662688-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4858/7951947/13ad962f1c9b/nihms-1662688-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4858/7951947/eb8f42ca347a/nihms-1662688-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of a predictive calculator to distinguish between patients presenting with dissociative versus epileptic seizures.验证一种预测计算器,以区分表现为分离性发作与癫痫性发作的患者。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Mar;116:107767. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.107767. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
2
Objective score from initial interview identifies patients with probable dissociative seizures.初始访谈的客观评分可识别出可能存在分离性发作的患者。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Dec;113:107525. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107525. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
3
Idiopathic (Genetic) Generalized Epilepsy特发性(遗传性)全身性癫痫
4
Diagnostic accuracy of clinical signs and symptoms for psychogenic nonepileptic attacks versus epileptic seizures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.临床征象和症状对心因性非癫痫发作与癫痫发作的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Aug;121(Pt A):108030. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108030. Epub 2021 May 21.
5
Prognosis of adults and children following a first unprovoked seizure.首次无诱因发作后成人和儿童的预后。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 23;1(1):CD013847. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013847.pub2.
6
Carbamazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.卡马西平与苯妥英钠单药治疗癫痫:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 27;2(2):CD001911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001911.pub3.
7
Factors associated with delay to video-EEG in dissociative seizures.与分离性癫痫视频脑电图延迟相关的因素。
Seizure. 2021 Mar;86:155-160. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.02.018. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
8
Carbamazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.卡马西平与苯妥英单药治疗癫痫:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 14(8):CD001911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001911.pub2.
9
Utility of serum lactate on differential diagnosis of seizure-like activity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.血清乳酸在鉴别诊断癫痫样活动中的效用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Seizure. 2022 Nov;102:134-142. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2022.10.007. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
10
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
The prevalence of comorbidities in people with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (2013-2023).2013 - 2023年心因性非癫痫性发作患者共病的患病率
Epilepsy Behav. 2025 Jul;168:110420. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110420. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
2
Development of a diagnostic checklist to identify functional cognitive disorder versus other neurocognitive disorders.制定一份诊断清单,以鉴别功能性认知障碍与其他神经认知障碍。
BMJ Neurol Open. 2025 Feb 27;7(1):e000918. doi: 10.1136/bmjno-2024-000918. eCollection 2025.
3
Supervised machine learning compared to large language models for identifying functional seizures from medical records.

本文引用的文献

1
Objective score from initial interview identifies patients with probable dissociative seizures.初始访谈的客观评分可识别出可能存在分离性发作的患者。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Dec;113:107525. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107525. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
2
Development and validation of a screening questionnaire for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures.精神性非癫痫性发作筛查问卷的编制与验证。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Nov;112:107482. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107482. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
3
White matter and neurite morphology differ in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures.
与大语言模型相比,监督式机器学习用于从医疗记录中识别功能性癫痫发作
Epilepsia. 2025 Apr;66(4):1155-1164. doi: 10.1111/epi.18272. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
4
Clinical Functional Seizure Score (CFSS): a simple algorithm for clinicians to suspect functional seizures.临床功能性癫痫发作评分(CFSS):一种供临床医生怀疑功能性癫痫发作的简单算法。
Front Neurol. 2023 Nov 29;14:1295266. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1295266. eCollection 2023.
5
Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Applications to Epilepsy: a Review for the Practicing Epileptologist.机器学习与人工智能在癫痫中的应用:给癫痫科执业医师的综述
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2023 Dec;23(12):869-879. doi: 10.1007/s11910-023-01318-7. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
6
Functional Seizure Clinics: A Proposed Financially Viable Solution to the Neurologist Supply and Demand Mismatch.功能性癫痫诊所:一种针对神经科医生供需不匹配问题的、在财务上可行的解决方案建议。
Neurol Clin Pract. 2023 Aug;13(4):e200179. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200179. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
心因性非癫痫性发作的脑白质和神经突形态不同。
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2020 Oct;7(10):1973-1984. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51198. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
4
Mortality in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures.心因性非癫痫性发作患者的死亡率。
Neurology. 2020 Aug 11;95(6):e643-e652. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009855. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
5
Cost-effectiveness of surgery for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy in the US.美国耐药性颞叶癫痫手术的成本效益。
Neurology. 2020 Sep 8;95(10):e1404-e1416. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010185. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
6
Cognitive behavioural therapy for adults with dissociative seizures (CODES): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.针对患有分离性癫痫的成年人的认知行为疗法(CODES):一项实用的多中心随机对照试验。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;7(6):491-505. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30128-0. Epub 2020 May 20.
7
Reply to: We need a functioning name for PNES: Considering dissociative seizures.回复:我们需要为精神源性非癫痫性发作确定一个实用的名称:考虑解离性癫痫发作。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Aug;109:107084. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107084. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
8
Machine learning as a diagnostic decision aid for patients with transient loss of consciousness.机器学习作为短暂意识丧失患者的诊断决策辅助手段。
Neurol Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;10(2):96-105. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000726.
9
We need a functioning name for PNES: Consider dissociative seizures.我们需要为假性癫痫发作(PNES)确定一个实用的名称:考虑使用分离性癫痫发作。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Apr;105:107002. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107002. Epub 2020 Mar 8.
10
Terminology for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: Making the case for "functional seizures".心因性非癲痫性发作术语:支持“功能性发作”。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Mar;104(Pt A):106895. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106895. Epub 2020 Jan 24.