Ferreira João André, Baptista Rui Miguel, Monteiro Sílvia Reis, Gonçalves Lino Manuel
Department of Cardiology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra.
iCBR, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jan 22;100(3):e23987. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023987.
The use of beta-blockers (BB) in the context of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was a universal practice in the pre-reperfusion era. Since then, evidence of their use for secondary prevention after STEMI is scarce. Our aim is to determine treatment results associated with BB therapy after a STEMI at 1-year follow-up in a contemporary nationwide cohort.A prospective analysis involving 49 national centers, including patients admitted with STEMI, enrolled between October 2010 and September 2019 was conducted. The primary outcome was defined as the composite of all-cause mortality or hospital re-admission for a cardiovascular (CV) cause in the first year after STEMI. The patients were distributed into 2 groups, depending on whether they received therapy with BB at hospital discharge or not (BB and NB group, respectively).A total of 3145 patients were included in the analysis, of which 2526 (80.3%) in the BB group. A total of 12.2% of patients reached the primary outcome. Regarding the univariate Cox regression analysis, the BB group presented lower mortality or re-admission for CV cause at 1-year follow-up [hazard ratio (HR) 0.69, confidence interval (CI) 95% 0.55-0.87, P = .001]. However, after adjustment for significant covariates, this association was lost (HR 0.73, CI 95% 0.51-1.04, P = .081). In patients with preserved (HR 0.73, CI 95% 0.51-1.04, P = .081) and mid-range (HR 1.01, CI 95% 0.64-1.61, P = .959) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), the primary outcome was similar between the 2 groups, while in patients with reduced LVEF, the BB group presented a better prognosis, with fewer patients reaching the primary outcome (HR 0.431, CI 95% 0.262-0.703, P = .001).BB universal therapy after STEMI has not proved useful, but it seems to be beneficial in patients with reduced LVEF.
在ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)背景下使用β受体阻滞剂(BB)在再灌注治疗时代之前是一种普遍做法。从那时起,关于其在STEMI后二级预防中的使用证据很少。我们的目的是在当代全国队列中,确定STEMI后1年随访时与BB治疗相关的治疗结果。
进行了一项前瞻性分析,涉及49个全国性中心,纳入了2010年10月至2019年9月期间收治的STEMI患者。主要结局定义为STEMI后第一年全因死亡或因心血管(CV)原因再次入院的综合情况。根据患者出院时是否接受BB治疗,将患者分为两组(分别为BB组和非BB组)。
共有3145例患者纳入分析,其中BB组2526例(80.3%)。共有12.2%的患者达到主要结局。关于单因素Cox回归分析,BB组在1年随访时CV原因导致的死亡率或再次入院率较低[风险比(HR)0.69,95%置信区间(CI)0.55 - 0.87,P = 0.001]。然而,在对显著协变量进行调整后,这种关联消失了(HR 0.73,95%CI 0.51 - 1.04,P = 0.081)。在左心室射血分数(LVEF)保留(HR 0.73,95%CI 0.51 - 1.04,P = 0.081)和中等范围(HR 1.01,95%CI 0.64 - 1.61,P = 0.959)的患者中,两组的主要结局相似,而在LVEF降低的患者中,BB组预后较好,达到主要结局的患者较少(HR 0.431,95%CI 0.262 - 0.703,P = 0.001)。
STEMI后BB普遍治疗尚未证明有用,但似乎对LVEF降低的患者有益。