Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jan 22;100(3):e24370. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024370.
Robotic surgical systems have evolved over time. The da Vinci Xi system was developed in 2014 and was expected to solve the shortcomings of the previous S system. Therefore, we conducted this study to compare these 2 systems and identify if the Xi system truly improves surgical outcomes.In this retrospective study, a total of 86 patients with unilateral papillary thyroid carcinoma without central lymph node involvement underwent gasless transaxillary hemithyroidectomy using 2 robotic systems, the da Vinci S and Xi. Forty patients were in the da Vinci S group and 46 patients were in the da Vinci Xi group. All surgeries were performed by 1 surgeon (YWC). All surgery video files were analyzed to compare the duration of each surgical step.The total operation time was significantly shorter in the Xi group than in the S group (153.0 minutes vs 105.7 minutes, P < .01). Time for robot docking was shorter in the Xi group (19.8 minutes vs 10.6 minutes, P < .01), and all procedures performed in the console also required a shorter time in this group. The overall complication rate did not differ significantly (P = .464).The da Vinci Xi system made robotic thyroidectomy easier and faster without increasing the complication rate. It is a safe and valuable system for robotic thyroidectomy.
机器人手术系统一直在发展。达芬奇 Xi 系统于 2014 年开发,旨在解决之前 S 系统的缺点。因此,我们进行了这项研究,以比较这两个系统,并确定 Xi 系统是否真的改善了手术结果。
在这项回顾性研究中,共有 86 名单侧甲状腺乳头状癌且无中央淋巴结受累的患者使用 2 种机器人系统(达芬奇 S 和 Xi)进行非气腹经腋窝入路半甲状腺切除术。达芬奇 S 组 40 例,达芬奇 Xi 组 46 例。所有手术均由 1 名外科医生(YWC)完成。分析所有手术视频文件以比较每个手术步骤的持续时间。
Xi 组的总手术时间明显短于 S 组(153.0 分钟比 105.7 分钟,P<.01)。Xi 组的机器人对接时间更短(19.8 分钟比 10.6 分钟,P<.01),并且该组在控制台进行的所有程序也需要更短的时间。总体并发症发生率无显著差异(P=.464)。
达芬奇 Xi 系统使机器人甲状腺切除术更容易、更快,而不会增加并发症发生率。它是机器人甲状腺切除术的一种安全且有价值的系统。