Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Wohlenstr. 50a, 3032, Hinterkappelen, Switzerland.
School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews,, St Mary's Quad, St Andrews, KY16 9JP, Scotland.
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 5;11(1):3228. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82526-4.
Direct reciprocity, where individuals apply the decision rule 'help someone who has helped you', is believed to be rare in non-human animals due to its high cognitive demands. Especially if previous encounters with several partners need to be correctly remembered, animals might either stop reciprocating favours previously received from an individual, or switch to the simpler generalized reciprocity mechanism. Here we tested the decision rules Norway rats apply when interacting with multiple partners before being able to return received help. In a sequential prisoner's dilemma situation, focal subjects encountered four different partners that were either helpful or not, on four consecutive days. On the fifth day, the focal subject was paired with one of the previous four partners and given the opportunity to provide it with food. The focal rats returned received help by closely matching the quantity of help their partner had previously provided, independently of the time delay between received and given help, and independently of the ultimate interaction preceding the test. This shows that direct reciprocity is not limited to dyadic situations in Norway rats, suggesting that cognitive demands involved in applying the required decision rules can be met by non-human animals even when they interact with multiple partners differing in helping propensity.
直接互惠,即个体应用“帮助帮助过你的人”的决策规则,由于其认知要求较高,被认为在非人类动物中较为罕见。特别是如果需要正确记住之前与几个伙伴的相遇,动物可能会停止回报以前从个体那里收到的恩惠,或者转而采用更简单的广义互惠机制。在这里,我们测试了挪威鼠在能够回报收到的帮助之前与多个伙伴互动时所应用的决策规则。在连续的囚徒困境情境中,焦点动物在连续四天里遇到了四个不同的、有帮助或没有帮助的伙伴。在第五天,焦点动物与之前的四个伙伴中的一个配对,并给予它提供食物的机会。焦点老鼠通过密切匹配它们的伙伴之前提供的帮助数量来回报收到的帮助,而不受收到和给予帮助之间的时间延迟的影响,也不受测试前的最终互动的影响。这表明,直接互惠不仅限于挪威鼠的二元情境,这表明即使当它们与帮助意愿不同的多个伙伴互动时,非人类动物也能够满足应用所需决策规则的认知要求。