• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Working dogs transfer different tasks in reciprocal cooperation.工作犬在互惠合作中传递不同的任务。
Biol Lett. 2018 Feb;14(2). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0460.
2
Working dogs cooperate among one another by generalised reciprocity.工作犬通过广义互惠进行相互合作。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 6;7:43867. doi: 10.1038/srep43867.
3
Norway rats reciprocate help according to the quality of help they received.挪威大鼠会根据它们所得到帮助的质量来回报帮助。
Biol Lett. 2015 Feb;11(2):20140959. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0959.
4
The smell of cooperation: rats increase helpful behaviour when receiving odour cues of a conspecific performing a cooperative task.合作的气味:当老鼠接收到同种动物执行合作任务时发出的气味线索时,它们会增加帮助行为。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Nov 25;287(1939):20202327. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2327.
5
Relatedness decreases and reciprocity increases cooperation in Norway rats.亲缘关系降低,互惠关系增加挪威鼠的合作。
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Mar 14;285(1874). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0035.
6
Discounting and reciprocity in an Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma.重复囚徒困境中的折扣与互惠
Science. 2002 Dec 13;298(5601):2216-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1078498.
7
Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) communicate need, which elicits donation of food.褐家鼠(挪威鼠)会传达需求,从而引发食物捐赠行为。
J Comp Psychol. 2018 May;132(2):119-129. doi: 10.1037/com0000102. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
8
Reciprocal cooperation between unrelated rats depends on cost to donor and benefit to recipient.无关大鼠之间的互惠合作取决于供体的成本和受体的收益。
BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Mar 29;12:41. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-41.
9
Rats show direct reciprocity when interacting with multiple partners.当与多个伙伴互动时,老鼠会表现出直接的互惠行为。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 5;11(1):3228. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82526-4.
10
Coaction versus reciprocity in continuous-time models of cooperation.合作连续时间模型中的共同作用与互惠行为
J Theor Biol. 2014 Sep 7;356:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.03.019. Epub 2014 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Do pet dogs reciprocate the receipt of food from familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics?宠物狗会对来自熟悉和不熟悉的同类的食物给予做出回应吗?
Ethology. 2024 Jan 10;130(4). doi: 10.1111/eth.13430. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Some dogs can find the payoff-dominant outcome in the Assurance game.一些狗能够在确信博弈中找到收益占优的结果。
iScience. 2023 Dec 9;27(1):108698. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108698. eCollection 2024 Jan 19.
3
Evidence suggesting that reindeer mothers allonurse according to the direct reciprocity and generalized reciprocity decision rules.有证据表明,驯鹿母亲根据直接互惠和广义互惠决策规则进行全哺乳。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 14;18(12):e0295497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295497. eCollection 2023.
4
Reaching Out for Inaccessible Food Is a Potential Begging Signal in Cooperating Wild-Type Norway Rats, .获取难以获取的食物是野生型挪威大鼠合作行为中一种潜在的乞食信号。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 30;12:712333. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712333. eCollection 2021.
5
Dogs fail to reciprocate the receipt of food from a human in a food-giving task.狗在食物给予任务中无法回应人类给予食物的行为。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 14;16(7):e0253277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253277. eCollection 2021.
6
The smell of cooperation: rats increase helpful behaviour when receiving odour cues of a conspecific performing a cooperative task.合作的气味:当老鼠接收到同种动物执行合作任务时发出的气味线索时,它们会增加帮助行为。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Nov 25;287(1939):20202327. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2327.
7
A Shared Food Source Is Not Necessary to Elicit Inequity Aversion in Dogs.共享食物来源并非引发犬类公平厌恶感的必要条件。
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 13;10:413. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00413. eCollection 2019.
8
Inequity aversion in dogs: a review.犬类的不公平厌恶:综述
Learn Behav. 2018 Dec;46(4):479-500. doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0338-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Working dogs cooperate among one another by generalised reciprocity.工作犬通过广义互惠进行相互合作。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 6;7:43867. doi: 10.1038/srep43867.
2
Reciprocal Exchange Patterned by Market Forces Helps Explain Cooperation in a Small-Scale Society.由市场力量塑造的互惠交换模式有助于解释小规模社会中的合作。
Curr Biol. 2016 Aug 22;26(16):2180-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.019. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
3
The evolution of cooperation based on direct fitness benefits.基于直接适应性益处的合作进化。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 5;371(1687):20150472. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0472.
4
Familiarity affects other-regarding preferences in pet dogs.熟悉度会影响宠物犬的亲社会偏好。
Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 16;5:18102. doi: 10.1038/srep18102.
5
Food sharing in vampire bats: reciprocal help predicts donations more than relatedness or harassment.吸血蝙蝠中的食物分享:互惠帮助比亲缘关系或骚扰更能预测捐赠。
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 2;280(1753):20122573. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2573. Print 2013 Feb 22.
6
Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation.为什么要友善?合作进化中的心理限制因素。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Feb;8(2):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.003.
7
Attitudinal reciprocity in food sharing among brown capuchin monkeys.棕色卷尾猴食物分享中的态度互惠
Anim Behav. 2000 Aug;60(2):253-261. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1471.
8
The evolution of cooperation.合作的演变
Science. 1981 Mar 27;211(4489):1390-6. doi: 10.1126/science.7466396.

工作犬在互惠合作中传递不同的任务。

Working dogs transfer different tasks in reciprocal cooperation.

机构信息

Behavioural Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Wohlenstrasse 50a, 3032 Hinterkappelen, Bern, Switzerland

Behavioural Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Wohlenstrasse 50a, 3032 Hinterkappelen, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Biol Lett. 2018 Feb;14(2). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0460.

DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2017.0460
PMID:29445042
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5830657/
Abstract

Direct reciprocity can establish stable cooperation among unrelated individuals. It is a common assumption of direct reciprocity models that agents exchange like with like, but this is not necessarily true for natural interactions. It is yet unclear whether animals apply direct reciprocity rules when successive altruistic help involves different tasks. Here, we tested whether working dogs transfer help from one to another cooperative task in an iterated prisoner's dilemma paradigm. In our experiment, individual dogs received help to obtain food from a conspecific, which involved a specific task. Subsequently, the focal subject could return received favour by using a different task. Working dogs transferred the cooperative experience received through one task by applying an alternative task when they helped a previously cooperative partner. By contrast, they refrained from helping previously defecting partners. This suggests that dogs realize the cooperative act of a conspecific, which changes their propensity to provide help to that partner by different means. The ability of animals to transfer different tasks when helping a social partner by satisfying the criteria of direct reciprocity might explain the frequent occurrence of reciprocal cooperation in nature.

摘要

直接互惠可以在不相关的个体之间建立稳定的合作关系。直接互惠模型的一个常见假设是,代理人以相同的方式进行交换,但对于自然交互来说,这不一定是正确的。目前还不清楚当连续的利他帮助涉及不同任务时,动物是否会应用直接互惠规则。在这里,我们测试了工作犬是否会在迭代囚徒困境范式中从一个合作任务转移到另一个合作任务。在我们的实验中,个体狗从同种动物那里获得帮助以获取食物,这涉及到一个特定的任务。随后,焦点动物可以通过使用不同的任务来回报收到的恩惠。当工作犬帮助以前合作的伙伴时,它们会通过应用替代任务来转移通过一项任务获得的合作经验。相比之下,他们会拒绝帮助以前的背叛伙伴。这表明,狗意识到同种动物的合作行为,这会改变它们通过不同方式向该伙伴提供帮助的意愿。动物在通过满足直接互惠标准帮助社交伙伴时转移不同任务的能力,可能解释了自然界中互惠合作的频繁发生。