Department of Innovative Technologies, in Medicine and Dentistry, "G. D'Annunzio" University, Chieti-Pescara, Italy.
Department of Surgical Science, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
J Periodontol. 2021 Nov;92(11):1576-1587. doi: 10.1002/JPER.20-0305. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
Growing evidence shows the efficacy of platelet concentrates in periodontal therapy. This study aimed to demonstrate that an inorganic bovine bone graft (IBB) in combination with a leukocyte and platelet rich fibrin (L-PRF) is non-inferior to a combination with a collagen membrane (CM) when managing unfavorable infrabony defects (IBDs).
All patients exhibited at least one unfavorable IBD; they were randomly assigned to two groups, 31 treated with L-PRF+IBB and 31 with CM+IBB. A clinical and radiographic examination was performed at baseline and 12 months later. Clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession (GR), probing depth (PD), and radiographic defect bone level (DBL) post-therapy changes were compared between the two treatments. A non-inferiority margin = 1 mm was set to determine the efficacy of the test treatment (-1 mm for GR); a second non-inferiority margin = 0.5 mm (-0.5 mm for GR) was chosen for clinical relevance.
Twelve months after surgery a significant improvement of clinical and radiographic parameters was observed at both experimental sites. The 90% confidence intervals of the CM+IBB-L-PRF+IBB mean difference for CAL gain (-0.810 mm [-1.300 to -0.319]) and DBL gain (-0.648 mm [-1.244 to -0.052]) were below the 0.5 mm non-inferiority margin; GR increase (1.284 mm [0.764 to 1.804]) remained above the -0.5 mm, while PD reduction (0.499 mm [0.145 to 0.853]) crossed its 0.5-mm margin.
The L-PRF+IBB treatment of unfavorable IBDs offers non-inferior efficacy for CAL gain, showing less GR and more DBL gain too, while for PD reduction it is inferior to the CM+IBB treatment.
越来越多的证据表明血小板浓缩物在牙周治疗中的疗效。本研究旨在证明,在治疗不利的骨下袋(IBD)时,无机牛骨移植物(IBB)与富含白细胞和血小板的纤维蛋白(L-PRF)的组合与与胶原膜(CM)的组合相比不劣。
所有患者均至少存在一个不利的 IBD;他们被随机分配到两组,31 例接受 L-PRF+IBB 治疗,31 例接受 CM+IBB 治疗。基线和 12 个月后进行临床和放射学检查。比较两种治疗方法治疗后临床附着水平(CAL)、牙龈退缩(GR)、探诊深度(PD)和放射学缺陷骨水平(DBL)的变化。设定非劣效性边界=1mm 以确定试验治疗的疗效(GR 为-1mm);为了临床相关性,选择了第二个非劣效性边界=0.5mm(GR 为-0.5mm)。
手术后 12 个月,两个实验组的临床和放射学参数均有显著改善。CM+IBB-L-PRF+IBB 平均差值的 90%置信区间(CAL 增益-0.810mm[-1.300 至-0.319]和 DBL 增益-0.648mm[-1.244 至-0.052])均低于 0.5mm 的非劣效性边界;GR 增加(1.284mm[0.764 至 1.804])仍高于-0.5mm,而 PD 减少(0.499mm[0.145 至 0.853])则超过其 0.5mm 边界。
L-PRF+IBB 治疗不利的 IBD 具有不劣于 CAL 增益的疗效,表现为 GR 减少和 DBL 增加更多,而对于 PD 减少,它劣于 CM+IBB 治疗。