Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, "G. D'Annunzio" University, 66100 Chieti-Pescara, Italy.
"Luisa D'Annunzio" Institute for High Culture, 65123 Pescara, Italy.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 3;60(7):1091. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071091.
: Unfavorable intrabony defects (IBDs) are associated with the progression of periodontal disease and tooth loss. Growing scientific evidence has demonstrated the effectiveness of platelet concentrations in periodontal treatment. The aim of our study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of an autogenous bone graft (ABG) associated with leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) compared to ABG + Collagen Membrane in the treatment of IBDs. : Sixty-four patients with at least one IBD were randomly assigned to two groups: ABG+L-PRF and CM+ABG. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession (GR), probing pocket depth (PPD), and radiograph defect bone level (DBL) were compared between the two treatments. To evaluate the effectiveness of ABG+L-PRF, a non-inferiority margin of =1 mm (-1 mm for GR) was chosen; a second non-inferiority margin of =0.5 mm (-0.5 mm for GR) was set for clinical relevance. : At 12-month follow up, both treatments showed clinical and radiographic improvements. The 90% confidence intervals of the CM+ABG-L-PRF+ABG mean difference for CAL gain (-0.0564 mm [-0.316 to 0.203]), DBL gain (-0.433 mm [-0.721 to -0.145]), and PPD reduction (0.232 mm [0.015 to 0.449]) were below the 0.5 mm non-inferiority margin; the GR increase (0.255 mm [0.0645 to 0.445]) stayed above the -0.5 mm. : the L-PRF+ABG treatment of unfavorable IBDs is non-inferior with respect to the CM+ABG therapy for CAL gain, but with a lower GR, a slightly higher PPD, and DBL gain.
: 不利的骨内缺损(IBDs)与牙周病的进展和牙齿丧失有关。越来越多的科学证据表明,血小板浓度在牙周治疗中的有效性。我们的研究旨在证明与 ABG+胶原膜(CM+ABG)相比,自体骨移植物(ABG)联合富含白细胞和血小板的纤维蛋白(L-PRF)治疗 IBD 的非劣效性。: 64 名至少有一个 IBD 的患者被随机分配到两组:ABG+L-PRF 和 CM+ABG。在基线和 12 个月的随访时进行临床和影像学评估。比较两种治疗方法的临床附着水平(CAL)、牙龈退缩(GR)、探诊袋深度(PPD)和 X 线片骨缺损水平(DBL)。为了评估 ABG+L-PRF 的有效性,选择了=1 毫米的非劣效性边界(GR 为-1 毫米);为了临床相关性,设定了第二个=0.5 毫米的非劣效性边界(GR 为-0.5 毫米)。: 在 12 个月的随访时,两种治疗方法均显示出临床和影像学改善。CM+ABG-L-PRF+ABG 均值差值的 90%置信区间为 CAL 增加(-0.0564 毫米[-0.316 至 0.203])、DBL 增加(-0.433 毫米[-0.721 至 -0.145])和 PPD 减少(0.232 毫米[0.015 至 0.449])均低于 0.5 毫米的非劣效性边界;GR 增加(0.255 毫米[0.0645 至 0.445])仍高于-0.5 毫米。: 与 CM+ABG 治疗相比,L-PRF+ABG 治疗不利的 IBD 在 CAL 增加方面非劣效,但 GR 较低,PPD 略高,DBL 增加。