Paediatric Neurology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
Centro Clinico Nemo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCSS, Rome, Italy.
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2021 Mar;8(3):548-557. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51276. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
The aim of this paper was to report the 2-year follow-up in type I patients treated with Nusinersen and to assess whether possible changes in motor function are related to the subtype, age, or SMN2 copy number.
Sixty-eight patients, with ages ranging from 0.20 to 15.92 years (mean: 3.96; standard deviation: +3.90) were enrolled in the study. All patients were assessed using the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP INTEND) and the developmental section of the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE-2) at the time they started treatment and 12 and 24 months after that.
For both CHOP and HINE-2 repeated measures analysis of variance showed a significant difference (P < 0.001) between baseline and 12 months, 12 months and 24 months, and baseline and 24-month scores for the whole group. When age subgroups (<210 days, <2 years, 2-4 years, 5-11 years, 12-18 years) were considered, on the CHOP INTEND the difference was significant between baseline and 24 months in all age subgroups. On the HINE-2, the difference between baseline and 24 months was significant in all the subgroups before the age of 4 years. Age was predictive of changes on both scales (P < 0.05), whereas SMN2 copy number and decimal classification were not.
Our results suggest that some improvement of motor function can be observed even after the first year of treatment. This is more obvious in the infants treated in the first 2 years but some improvement can also be found in older children.
本文旨在报告接受 nusinersen 治疗的 I 型患者的 2 年随访结果,并评估运动功能的变化是否与亚型、年龄或 SMN2 拷贝数有关。
本研究共纳入 68 例患者,年龄 0.20-15.92 岁(平均 3.96 岁,标准差 3.90)。所有患者在开始治疗时以及治疗后 12 个月和 24 个月时均采用费城儿童医院婴儿神经肌肉疾病测试(CHOP INTEND)和哈默史密斯婴儿神经检查(HINE-2)的发育部分进行评估。
对于 CHOP 和 HINE-2,重复测量方差分析显示,整个组在基线与 12 个月、12 个月与 24 个月以及基线与 24 个月时的评分之间存在显著差异(P<0.001)。当考虑年龄亚组(<210 天、<2 岁、2-4 岁、5-11 岁、12-18 岁)时,CHOP INTEND 在所有年龄亚组中,基线与 24 个月之间的差异均具有统计学意义。在 HINE-2 中,在 4 岁之前的所有亚组中,基线与 24 个月之间的差异均具有统计学意义。年龄是两种量表变化的预测因素(P<0.05),而 SMN2 拷贝数和十进制分类则不是。
我们的研究结果表明,即使在治疗后的第一年也可以观察到运动功能的一些改善。在治疗的前 2 年内,婴儿的改善更为明显,但在年龄较大的儿童中也可以发现一些改善。