Suppr超能文献

肌萎缩侧索硬化症认知功能的筛查:一种新型筛查方法的测试特征

Screening for cognition in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: test characteristics of a new screen.

作者信息

Beeldman Emma, Govaarts Rosanne, de Visser Marianne, van Es Michael A, Pijnenburg Yolande A L, Schmand Ben A, Raaphorst Joost

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22700, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Utrecht Brain Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Neurol. 2021 Jul;268(7):2533-2540. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10423-x. Epub 2021 Feb 6.

Abstract

Cognitive and behavioural impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) negatively influences the quality of life and survival, and, therefore, screening for these impairments is recommended. We developed a cognitive screening tool, the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-frontotemporal dementia-cognitive screen (ALS-FTD-Cog) and aimed to validate it in patients with ALS. During the current study, the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen (ECAS) was published and we, therefore, decided to compare these two cognitive screening methods. The ALS-FTD-Cog was administered to 72 patients with ALS, 21 patients with behavioural variant FTD (bvFTD) and 34 healthy controls. Twenty-nine patients with ALS underwent the ECAS. ROC curve analyses were performed and sensitivity and specificity of the ALS-FTD-Cog and ECAS were calculated, with a neuropsychological examination (NPE) as the gold standard. Cognitive impairment was present in 28% of patients with ALS. ROC curve analyses of the ALS-FTD-Cog and ECAS showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72 (95% CI 0.58-0.86) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.86-1.03), respectively. Compared to a full NPE, sensitivity and specificity of the ALS-FTD-Cog were 65.0% and 63.5% and of the ECAS 83.3% and 91.3%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the ALS-FTD-Cog in patients with bvFTD were 94.4% and 100%, respectively. Test characteristics of the ALS-FTD-Cog were moderate, suggesting restricted practical value, as compared to a comprehensive NPE. The ECAS had an excellent AUC and high sensitivity and specificity, indicating that it is a valid screening instrument for cognitive impairment in ALS.

摘要

肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)中的认知和行为障碍会对生活质量和生存期产生负面影响,因此,建议对这些障碍进行筛查。我们开发了一种认知筛查工具,即肌萎缩侧索硬化症-额颞叶痴呆-认知筛查量表(ALS-FTD-Cog),旨在在ALS患者中对其进行验证。在本研究期间,爱丁堡认知和行为ALS筛查量表(ECAS)发表了,因此,我们决定比较这两种认知筛查方法。对72例ALS患者、21例行为变异型额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)患者和34名健康对照者进行了ALS-FTD-Cog评估。29例ALS患者接受了ECAS评估。以神经心理学检查(NPE)作为金标准,进行了ROC曲线分析,并计算了ALS-FTD-Cog和ECAS的敏感性和特异性。28%的ALS患者存在认知障碍。ALS-FTD-Cog和ECAS的ROC曲线分析显示,曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.72(95%CI 0.58-0.86)和0.95(95%CI 0.86-1.03)。与全面的NPE相比,ALS-FTD-Cog的敏感性和特异性分别为65.0%和63.5%,ECAS的敏感性和特异性分别为83.3%和91.3%。ALS-FTD-Cog在bvFTD患者中的敏感性和特异性分别为94.4%和100%。与全面的NPE相比,ALS-FTD-Cog的测试特性中等,提示其实用价值有限。ECAS具有出色的AUC以及高敏感性和特异性,表明它是一种有效的ALS认知障碍筛查工具。

相似文献

2
The Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen (ECAS) in frontotemporal dementia.额颞叶痴呆的爱丁堡认知和行为 ALS 筛查(ECAS)。
Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2020 Nov;21(7-8):606-613. doi: 10.1080/21678421.2020.1797090. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
7
Persian adaptation of Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural Screen (ECAS).爱丁堡认知与行为筛查量表(ECAS)的波斯语适应性研究。
Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2021 Aug;22(5-6):426-433. doi: 10.1080/21678421.2021.1883665. Epub 2021 Feb 17.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验