Ohshimo Shinichiro
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
J Intensive Care. 2021 Feb 6;9(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40560-021-00532-0.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a fatal condition with insufficiently clarified etiology. Supportive care for severe hypoxemia remains the mainstay of essential interventions for ARDS. In recent years, adequate ventilation to prevent ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI) as well as lung-protective mechanical ventilation has an increasing attention in ARDS.Ventilation-perfusion mismatch may augment severe hypoxemia and inspiratory drive and consequently induce P-SILI. Respiratory drive and effort must also be carefully monitored to prevent P-SILI. Airway occlusion pressure (P) and airway pressure deflection during an end-expiratory airway occlusion (P) could be easy indicators to evaluate the respiratory drive and effort. Patient-ventilator dyssynchrony is a time mismatching between patient's effort and ventilator drive. Although it is frequently unrecognized, dyssynchrony can be associated with poor clinical outcomes. Dyssynchrony includes trigger asynchrony, cycling asynchrony, and flow delivery mismatch. Ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction (VIDD) is a form of iatrogenic injury from inadequate use of mechanical ventilation. Excessive spontaneous breathing can lead to P-SILI, while excessive rest can lead to VIDD. Optimal balance between these two manifestations is probably associated with the etiology and severity of the underlying pulmonary disease.High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) are non-invasive techniques for supporting hypoxemia. While they are beneficial as respiratory supports in mild ARDS, there can be a risk of delaying needed intubation. Mechanical ventilation and ECMO are applied for more severe ARDS. However, as with HFNC/NPPV, inappropriate assessment of breathing workload potentially has a risk of delaying the timing of shifting from ventilator to ECMO. Various methods of oxygen administration in ARDS are important. However, it is also important to evaluate whether they adequately reduce the breathing workload and help to improve ARDS.
急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)是一种病因尚未完全明确的致命性疾病。对严重低氧血症的支持性治疗仍然是ARDS基本干预措施的主要内容。近年来,为预防呼吸机诱发的肺损伤(VILI)和患者自身造成的肺损伤(P-SILI)而进行的充分通气以及肺保护性机械通气在ARDS中受到越来越多的关注。通气-灌注不匹配可能会加重严重低氧血症和吸气驱动力,从而诱发P-SILI。还必须仔细监测呼吸驱动力和用力情况以预防P-SILI。气道闭塞压(P0.1)和呼气末气道闭塞期间的气道压力偏转(Pflex)可能是评估呼吸驱动力和用力情况的简易指标。患者-呼吸机不同步是指患者用力与呼吸机驱动之间的时间不匹配。尽管它常常未被识别,但不同步可能与不良临床结局相关。不同步包括触发不同步、切换不同步和气流输送不匹配。呼吸机诱发的膈肌功能障碍(VIDD)是机械通气使用不当导致的一种医源性损伤形式。过度的自主呼吸可导致P-SILI,而过度休息则可导致VIDD。这两种表现之间的最佳平衡可能与潜在肺部疾病的病因和严重程度有关。高流量鼻导管(HFNC)和无创正压通气(NPPV)是支持低氧血症的无创技术。虽然它们在轻度ARDS中作为呼吸支持是有益的,但存在延迟必要插管的风险。机械通气和体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)用于更严重的ARDS。然而,与HFNC/NPPV一样,对呼吸负荷的不恰当评估可能存在延迟从呼吸机过渡到ECMO时机的风险。ARDS中各种给氧方法都很重要。然而,评估它们是否能充分减轻呼吸负荷并有助于改善ARDS也很重要。