• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人经自然腔道标本取出术与传统机器人辅助手术(NOTR)治疗结直肠癌患者的随机对照试验研究方案。

Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus traditional robotic-assisted surgery (NOTR) for patients with colorectal cancer: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

The First Clinical Medical College of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330000, China.

Department of Cardiology, The Third Hospital of Nanchang, Nanchang, 330000, China.

出版信息

Trials. 2021 Feb 6;22(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05077-z.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-021-05077-z
PMID:33549133
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7866755/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for colorectal cancer has been introduced in order to reduce the abdominal incision, demonstrating major development potential in minimally invasive surgery. We are conducting this randomized controlled trial to assess whether robotic NOSES is non-inferior to traditional robotic-assisted surgery for patients with colorectal cancer in terms of primary and secondary outcomes.

METHOD/DESIGN: Accordingly, a prospective, open-label, randomized controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, and non-inferiority trial will be conducted to discuss the safety and efficacy of robotic natural orifice extraction surgery compared to traditional robotic-assisted surgery. Here, 550 estimated participants will be enrolled to have 80% power to detect differences with a one-sided significance level of 0.025 in consideration of the non-inferiority margin of 10%. The primary outcome is the incidence of surgical complications, which will be classified using the Clavien-Dindo system.

DISCUSSION

This trial is expected to reveal whether robotic NOSES is non-inferior to traditional robotic-assisted surgery, which is of great significance in regard to the development of robotic NOSES for patients with colorectal cancer in the minimally invasive era. Furthermore, robotic NOSES is expected to exhibit superiority to traditional robotic-assisted surgery in terms of both primary and secondary outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04230772 . Registered on January 15, 2020.

摘要

背景

为了减少腹部切口,已经引入了用于结直肠癌的自然腔道标本提取手术,这在微创手术中显示出了很大的发展潜力。我们正在进行这项随机对照试验,以评估机器人经自然腔道取标本手术(NOSES)是否在主要和次要结局方面不劣于传统的机器人辅助手术。

方法/设计:因此,将进行一项前瞻性、开放标签、随机对照、平行组、多中心和非劣效性试验,以讨论与传统机器人辅助手术相比,机器人自然腔道取标本手术的安全性和疗效。在这里,预计将招募 550 名参与者,以 80%的效能检测考虑到非劣效性边界为 10%时单侧显著性水平为 0.025 的差异。主要结局是手术并发症的发生率,将使用 Clavien-Dindo 系统进行分类。

讨论

本试验有望揭示机器人经自然腔道取标本手术是否不劣于传统的机器人辅助手术,这对于微创时代结直肠癌患者的机器人经自然腔道取标本手术的发展具有重要意义。此外,机器人经自然腔道取标本手术在主要和次要结局方面有望优于传统的机器人辅助手术。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04230772。于 2020 年 1 月 15 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/283c/7866755/eb062e8d5442/13063_2021_5077_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/283c/7866755/94d6262d778f/13063_2021_5077_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/283c/7866755/eb062e8d5442/13063_2021_5077_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/283c/7866755/94d6262d778f/13063_2021_5077_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/283c/7866755/eb062e8d5442/13063_2021_5077_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus traditional robotic-assisted surgery (NOTR) for patients with colorectal cancer: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.机器人经自然腔道标本取出术与传统机器人辅助手术(NOTR)治疗结直肠癌患者的随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Feb 6;22(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05077-z.
2
Progress, challenges, and future perspectives of robot-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for colorectal cancer: a review.机器人辅助自然腔道标本提取术治疗结直肠癌的进展、挑战与未来展望:综述
BMC Surg. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02538-5.
3
Role of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in colorectal neoplasms.机器人经自然腔道标本提取手术在结直肠肿瘤中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 10;11(1):9818. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89323-z.
4
Comparison of short-term efficacy analysis of medium-rectal cancer surgery with robotic natural orifice specimen extraction and robotic transabdominal specimen extraction.比较经自然腔道取标本机器人手术与经腹部取标本机器人手术治疗中低位直肠癌的近期疗效分析。
BMC Surg. 2023 Nov 8;23(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02216-y.
5
Comparison of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in short-terms outcomes of middle rectal cancer.比较机器人辅助与腹腔镜辅助自然腔道标本提取术治疗中低位直肠癌的短期疗效。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jul 4;21(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03083-w.
6
Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus small-incision assisted laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy.自然腔道标本取出术与小切口辅助腹腔镜右半结肠根治术的比较。
Future Oncol. 2023 Dec;19(40):2641-2650. doi: 10.2217/fon-2023-0769. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
7
Comparison of transabdominal wall specimen retrieval and natural orifice specimen extraction robotic surgery in the outcome of colorectal cancer treatment.经腹壁标本取出与经自然腔道标本提取机器人手术在结直肠癌治疗结局中的比较。
Front Surg. 2023 Feb 16;10:1092128. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1092128. eCollection 2023.
8
Comparative analysis of the safety and effectiveness of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal tumors through systematic review and meta-analysis.通过系统评价和荟萃分析比较经自然腔道取标本机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠肿瘤的安全性和有效性。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Oct 19;18(1):374. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02090-7.
9
Robot-assisted approach to cervical cancer (RACC): an international multi-center, open-label randomized controlled trial.机器人辅助治疗宫颈癌(RACC):一项国际多中心、开放性、随机对照临床试验。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Jul;29(6):1072-1076. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000558. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
10
Robotic versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic and Periampullary Tumors (PORTAL): a study protocol for a multicenter phase III non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.机器人与开腹胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺和壶腹周围肿瘤(PORTAL):一项多中心 III 期非劣效性随机对照临床试验研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Dec 27;22(1):954. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05939-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus robotic transabdominal specimen extraction surgery for early-stage rectal cancer: a multicenter propensity score-matched analysis (in China).机器人经自然腔道标本取出术与机器人经腹腔标本取出术治疗早期直肠癌的多中心倾向评分匹配分析(中国)。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4521-4530. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10995-5. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
2
Application of artificial intelligence in diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer: A novel Prospect.人工智能在结直肠癌诊疗中的应用:一种新前景。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 8;10:1128084. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1128084. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Can transanal natural orifice specimen extraction after laparoscopic anterior resection for colorectal cancer reduce the inflammatory response?经肛门自然腔道取标本腹腔镜结直肠前切除术是否可以减轻结直肠癌患者的炎症反应?
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jun;35(6):1016-1022. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14919. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
2
Safety and Oncological Outcomes of Laparoscopic NOSE Surgery Compared With Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Diseases: A Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜NOSE手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠疾病的安全性及肿瘤学结局:一项Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2019 Jul 3;9:597. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00597. eCollection 2019.
3
Comparison of transabdominal wall specimen retrieval and natural orifice specimen extraction robotic surgery in the outcome of colorectal cancer treatment.
经腹壁标本取出与经自然腔道标本提取机器人手术在结直肠癌治疗结局中的比较。
Front Surg. 2023 Feb 16;10:1092128. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1092128. eCollection 2023.
4
Influence of transvaginal laparoscopic surgery on sexual function, life quality and short-term efficacy of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer.经阴道腹腔镜手术对结直肠癌患者性功能、生活质量及短期疗效的影响。
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Jul 15;14(7):5098-5106. eCollection 2022.
Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: innovations in surgical techniques.
转移性结直肠癌的治疗:手术技术的创新
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Apr;119(5):653-659. doi: 10.1002/jso.25418. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
4
International consensus on natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for colorectal cancer.结直肠癌经自然腔道取标本手术(NOSES)的国际共识
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2019 Feb;7(1):24-31. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goy055. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
5
Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Multivisceral Resection for Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer.微创与开放广泛性结直肠切除术治疗局部进展期结直肠癌的近期和远期疗效。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Jan;62(1):40-46. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001255.
6
Success rate of natural orifice specimen extraction after laparoscopic colorectal resections.腹腔镜结直肠切除术后自然腔道标本取出的成功率。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Apr;21(4):295-300. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1611-2. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
7
Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction With Single Stapling Colorectal Anastomosis for Laparoscopic Anterior Resection: Feasibility, Outcomes, and Technical Considerations.经自然腔道标本取出术联合单吻合器技术行腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术:可行性、疗效及技术要点
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Jan;60(1):43-50. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000739.
8
Developing a robotic colorectal cancer surgery program: understanding institutional and individual learning curves.开展机器人辅助结直肠癌手术项目:了解机构和个人的学习曲线。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2820-2828. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5292-0. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
9
Clinical outcomes and cost-benefit analysis comparing laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgeries.比较腹腔镜和机器人辅助结直肠手术的临床结果及成本效益分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5490-5493. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4910-1. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
10
Transanal natural orifice specimen extraction in colorectal surgery: bacteriological and oncological concerns.结直肠手术中的经肛门自然腔道标本取出术:细菌学及肿瘤学相关问题
ANZ J Surg. 2016 Apr;86(4):299-302. doi: 10.1111/ans.13383. Epub 2015 Nov 24.