Department of Psychology, Lund University, Sweden.
Department of Psychology, Lund University, Sweden.
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Apr 16;154:107776. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107776. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
Resolving interference between overlapping memories is crucial to remember the past. This study tests the novel prediction that orienting search focus benefits goal-relevant retrieval by reducing competition from unwanted memories. In a modified retrieval-practice paradigm, participants encoded word-pairs in one of two encoding tasks. Critically, to evaluate whether this retrieval orientation (RO) reduces memory interference, target and competitor memories were always related to different encoding tasks. At retrieval, instructions were provided for half of the blocks with the intention to bias remembering towards items encoded with one of the ROs. Behavioural data show that adopting an RO improved target accessibility, strengthened the testing effect, and reduced retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF) of competitors. Specifically, RIF - typically attributed to inhibitory control of memory interference - was prominent when no retrieval orientation (NRO) instruction was provided. Furthermore, a neural correlate of RO was calculated by training a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) to discriminate the electroencephalographic (EEG) spatial brain patterns correspondent to the two ROs over the time course of selective retrieval. RO was characterised by increases in the theta and decreases in the beta frequency band, evident both before and after category-cue onset. While the pre-cue RO reinstatement effect predicted both immediate retrieval-practice success and later target accessibility, the post-cue effect predicted disengagement of inhibitory control, such that participants showing a stronger RO reinstatement effect showed lower levels of RIF. These data suggest that strategically orienting search focus during retrieval both increases target memory accessibility and reduces memory interference, which consequently protects related memories from inhibition and later forgetting. Furthermore, they also highlight the roles of theta and beta oscillations in establishing and maintaining a task-relevant bias towards target memory representations during competitive memory retrieval.
解决重叠记忆之间的干扰对于记住过去至关重要。本研究检验了一个新的预测,即通过减少来自不需要的记忆的竞争,定向搜索焦点有利于目标相关的检索。在修改后的检索实践范式中,参与者在两种编码任务之一中编码词对。关键是,为了评估这种检索定向(RO)是否减少了记忆干扰,目标和竞争者记忆总是与不同的编码任务相关。在检索时,一半的块提供了指令,目的是偏向于使用其中一种 RO 编码的项目进行记忆。行为数据表明,采用 RO 提高了目标可访问性,增强了测试效应,并减少了竞争者的检索诱导遗忘(RIF)。具体来说,当没有提供检索定向(NRO)指令时,RIF——通常归因于记忆干扰的抑制控制——非常明显。此外,通过训练线性判别分析(LDA)来计算 RO 的神经相关性,以在选择性检索的时间过程中辨别对应于两个 RO 的脑电图(EEG)空间脑模式。RO 的特征是在 theta 和 beta 频带中增加和减少,在类别线索出现之前和之后都很明显。虽然预线索 RO 恢复效应预测了即时检索实践的成功和随后的目标可访问性,但后线索效应预测了抑制控制的解除,因此表现出更强的 RO 恢复效应的参与者表现出更低水平的 RIF。这些数据表明,在检索过程中策略性地定向搜索焦点既增加了目标记忆的可访问性,又减少了记忆干扰,从而防止相关记忆受到抑制和随后的遗忘。此外,它们还突出了 theta 和 beta 振荡在建立和维持竞争记忆检索中对目标记忆表示的任务相关偏向方面的作用。