Research Group Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Faculty of Education Sciences and CLINURSID Research Group, Universidade de Santiago de Compostella, Spain.
Resuscitation. 2021 May;162:205-217. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.01.033. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
The ILCOR Basic Life Support Task Force and the international drowning research community considered it timely to undertake a scoping review of the literature to identify evidence relating to the initial resuscitation, hospital-based interventions and criteria for safe discharge related to drowning.
Medline, PreMedline, Embase, Cochrane Reviews and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from 2000 to June 2020 to identify relevant literature. Titles and abstracts and if necessary full text were reviewed in duplicate. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported on the population (adults and children who are submerged in water), interventions (resuscitation in water/boats, airway management, oxygen administration, AED use, bystander CPR, ventilation strategies, ECMO, protocols for hospital discharge (I), comparator (standard care) and outcomes (O) survival, survival with a favourable neurological outcome, CPR quality, physiological end-points).
The database search yielded 3242 references (Medline 1104, Pre-Medline 202, Embase 1722, Cochrane reviews 12, Cochrane CENTRAL 202). After removal of duplicates 2377 papers were left for screening titles and abstracts. In total 65 unique papers were included. The evidence identified was from predominantly high-income countries and lacked consistency in the populations, interventions and outcomes reported. Clinical studies were exclusively observational in nature.
This scoping review found that there is very limited evidence from observational studies to inform evidence based clinical practice guidelines for drowning. The review highlights an urgent need for high quality research in drowning.
ILCOR 基础生命支持工作组和国际溺水研究界认为,及时对文献进行范围界定审查,以确定与溺水相关的初始复苏、医院干预和安全出院标准相关的证据是适时的。
从 2000 年到 2020 年 6 月,检索了 Medline、PreMedline、Embase、Cochrane 评价和 Cochrane 中心数据库,以确定相关文献。如果有必要,将标题和摘要以及全文进行了重复审查。如果研究报告了人群(淹没在水中的成年人和儿童)、干预措施(水中/船上复苏、气道管理、给氧、AED 使用、旁观者 CPR、通气策略、ECMO、医院出院(I)协议、比较(标准护理)和结局(O)存活率、有良好神经结局的存活率、CPR 质量、生理终点),则研究符合纳入标准。
数据库检索产生了 3242 条参考文献(Medline 1104,Pre-Medline 202,Embase 1722,Cochrane 评价 12,Cochrane 中心 202)。去除重复项后,留下 2377 篇论文进行标题和摘要筛选。总共纳入了 65 篇独特的论文。确定的证据主要来自高收入国家,所报告的人群、干预措施和结局缺乏一致性。临床研究本质上完全是观察性的。
本范围界定审查发现,只有非常有限的观察性研究证据可以为溺水的循证临床实践指南提供信息。该审查强调了迫切需要在溺水方面开展高质量研究。