• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Mobile phone use among commercial drivers in Ghana: An important threat to road safety.加纳商业司机使用手机:对道路安全的一项重大威胁。
Ghana Med J. 2018 Sep;52(3):122-126. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v52i3.3.
2
Effects of road infrastructure and traffic complexity in speed adaptation behaviour of distracted drivers.道路基础设施和交通复杂性对分心驾驶者速度适应行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Apr;101:67-77. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.018. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
3
Mobile phone use while driving: Development and validation of knowledge, attitude, and practice survey instruments.驾驶时使用手机:知识、态度和实践调查工具的开发和验证。
J Safety Res. 2021 Jun;77:30-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.01.004. Epub 2021 Feb 21.
4
Is organized carpooling safer? Speeding and distracted driving behaviors from a naturalistic driving study in Brazil.拼车是否更安全?巴西自然驾驶研究中的超速和分心驾驶行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;152:105992. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.105992. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
5
Mobile phone use among car drivers and motorcycle riders: The effect of problematic mobile phone use, attitudes, beliefs and perceived risk.手机使用与汽车司机和摩托车骑手:问题手机使用行为、态度、信念和感知风险的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Aug;143:105592. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105592. Epub 2020 May 30.
6
"It is frustrating to not have control even though I know it's not legal!": A mixed-methods investigation on applications to prevent mobile phone use while driving.“即使我知道这是不合法的,但却无法控制自己,这真令人沮丧!”:一项关于申请防止开车时使用手机的混合方法研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Mar;137:105412. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105412. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
7
Drivers' gap acceptance behaviours at intersections: A driving simulator study to understand the impact of mobile phone visual-manual interactions.驾驶员在交叉口的视距接受行为:一项驾驶模拟器研究,旨在了解手机视觉-手动交互的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Apr;138:105486. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105486. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
8
Characteristics of driver cell phone use and their influence on driving performance: A naturalistic driving study.驾驶时使用手机的特点及其对驾驶性能的影响:一项自然驾驶研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Dec;148:105845. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105845. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
9
A parametric duration model of the reaction times of drivers distracted by mobile phone conversations.驾驶员在手机通话中分心时的反应时间的参数持续时间模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Jan;62:42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.09.010. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
10
Gap acceptance behaviour and crash risks of mobile phone distracted young drivers at roundabouts: A random parameters survival model.环岛处使用手机分散年轻驾驶员注意力时的行车视距接受行为和碰撞风险:随机参数生存模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Oct;206:107720. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107720. Epub 2024 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of cell phone use while driving in different urban settings. A roadside observational study in maputo city, Mozambique.在不同城市环境中驾车时使用手机的情况。莫桑比克马普托市的一项路边观察性研究。
Heliyon. 2025 Jan 16;11(2):e42047. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42047. eCollection 2025 Jan 30.
2
Visual assessment of commercial drivers in the South West Region of Cameroon.喀麦隆西南地区商业司机的视力评估。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar 23;21(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-01909-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Frequency of Alcohol Use Among Injured Adult Patients Presenting to a Ghanaian Emergency Department.前往加纳急诊科就诊的成年受伤患者的饮酒频率
Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Oct;68(4):492-500.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.04.033. Epub 2016 May 27.
2
FACTORS RELATED TO MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENT RISK BEHAVIOR AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN NORTHEASTERN THAILAND.泰国东北部大学生中与摩托车事故风险行为相关的因素
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2015 Jul;46(4):805-21.
3
Serial Assessment of Trauma Care Capacity in Ghana in 2004 and 2014.2004年和2014年加纳创伤护理能力的系列评估
JAMA Surg. 2016 Feb;151(2):164-71. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.3648.
4
Risky driving behavior among university students and staff in the Sultanate of Oman.阿曼苏丹国大学生和教职员的危险驾驶行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Sep;58:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.021. Epub 2013 Apr 27.
5
Under-reporting of road traffic crash data in Ghana.加纳道路交通碰撞数据漏报。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2012;19(4):331-9. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2011.628752. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
6
Phone use and crashes while driving: A representative survey of drivers in two Australian states.驾驶时使用手机与撞车事故:对澳大利亚两个州驾驶员的代表性调查。
Med J Aust. 2006;185(11-12):630-4. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00734.x.
7
The impact of driver distraction on road safety: results from a representative survey in two Australian states.驾驶员注意力分散对道路安全的影响:澳大利亚两个州的代表性调查结果。
Inj Prev. 2006 Aug;12(4):242-7. doi: 10.1136/ip.2006.012336.
8
[Prevention of traffic deaths in accidents involving motor vehicles].[预防涉及机动车事故中的交通死亡]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2006 May 1;168(18):1764-8.
9
Examining the impact of cell phone conversations on driving using meta-analytic techniques.运用元分析技术研究手机通话对驾驶的影响。
Hum Factors. 2006 Spring;48(1):196-205. doi: 10.1518/001872006776412135.
10
Factors influencing the use of cellular (mobile) phone during driving and hazards while using it.影响驾驶时使用手机(移动电话)的因素以及使用手机时的危害。
Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Jan;37(1):47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2004.06.003.

加纳商业司机使用手机:对道路安全的一项重大威胁。

Mobile phone use among commercial drivers in Ghana: An important threat to road safety.

作者信息

Donkor Isaac, Gyedu Adam, Edusei Anthony K, Ebel Beth E, Donkor Peter

机构信息

Ghana Red Cross Health Services, Brong Ahafo Region, Sunyani, Ghana.

Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana.

出版信息

Ghana Med J. 2018 Sep;52(3):122-126. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v52i3.3.

DOI:10.4314/gmj.v52i3.3
PMID:30602796
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6303548/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ghana passed a law in 2012 banning the use of mobile phones while driving. However, data on compliance to the law has been lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To examine factors associated with mobile phone use while driving among Ghanaian commercial drivers.

METHODS

A survey was conducted among 627 commercial drivers (98.0% response rate). Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to determine how covariates influenced commercial drivers' use of phones while driving. The covariates included driver age, education, driving route distance, driving under the influence (DUI), and knowledge that phone use during driving causes distraction.

RESULTS

Respondents were aware of the law (94.7%) but compliance was low (38%). Drivers who did not believe that cell phone use contributed to crash risk were more likely to report distracted driving (AOR 2.02,95%CI 1.05-3.9). Drivers who had completed primary (AOR 4.49,95%CI 1.14-17.78) or at least senior high school (AOR 6.89,95%CI 1.5-31.59) had increased odds of using the phone while driving, compared to those having no formal education. Drivers with 6-10 years (AOR 2.00,95%CI 1.00-3.98) or >10 years driving experience (AOR 2.87,95%CI 1.24-6.62) were more likely to report distracted driving compared to those with ≤5 years' experience. Drivers who travelled longer distances were more likely to report distracted driving (AOR 2.41,95%CI 1.23-4.71). Those who had never engaged in DUI were less likely to use the phone while driving (AOR 0.06,95%CI 0.01-0.43).

CONCLUSION

Future prevention efforts for distracted driving in Ghana will require targeted distracted driving enforcement and education for commercial drivers and their passengers.

FUNDING

This study was funded, in part, by a grant (D43-TW007267) from the Fogarty International Center, US National Institutes of Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

摘要

背景

加纳于2012年通过一项法律,禁止在驾驶时使用手机。然而,一直缺乏关于该法律遵守情况的数据。

目的

研究加纳商业司机驾驶时使用手机的相关因素。

方法

对627名商业司机进行了一项调查(回复率为98.0%)。进行了双变量和多变量逻辑回归,以确定协变量如何影响商业司机驾驶时使用手机的情况。协变量包括司机年龄、教育程度、驾驶路线距离、酒后驾车以及知晓驾驶时使用手机会导致分心。

结果

受访者知晓该法律(94.7%),但遵守率较低(38%)。不认为使用手机会增加撞车风险的司机更有可能报告分心驾驶(调整后比值比[AOR]为2.02,95%置信区间[CI]为1.05 - 3.9)。与未接受过正规教育的司机相比,完成小学教育的司机(AOR为4.49,95%CI为1.14 - 17.78)或至少完成高中教育的司机(AOR为6.89,95%CI为1.5 - 31.59)在驾驶时使用手机的几率增加。与驾驶经验≤5年的司机相比,驾驶经验为6 - 10年的司机(AOR为2.00,95%CI为1.00 - 3.98)或驾驶经验>10年的司机(AOR为2.87,95%CI为1.24 - 6.62)更有可能报告分心驾驶。行驶距离较长的司机更有可能报告分心驾驶(AOR为2.41,95%CI为1.23 - 4.71)。从未有过酒后驾车行为的司机在驾驶时使用手机的可能性较小(AOR为0.06,95%CI为0.01 - 0.43)。

结论

加纳未来预防分心驾驶的工作将需要针对商业司机及其乘客进行有针对性的分心驾驶执法和教育。

资金

本研究部分由美国国立卫生研究院福格蒂国际中心的一项拨款(D43 - TW007267)资助。内容仅由作者负责,不一定代表国立卫生研究院的官方观点。