AIMEN Technology Center, c/ Relva, 27A - Torneiros, Pontevedra, 36410 Porriño, Spain; ICRA, Catalan Institute for Water Research, Scientific and Technological Park of the University of Girona, Emili Grahit, 101, E-17003 Girona, Spain; Universitat de Girona, E-17003 Girona, Spain.
GEMMA-Group of Environmental Engineering and Microbiology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya-BarcelonaTech, c/ Jordi Girona 1-3, Building D1, E-08034 Barcelona, Spain.
J Hazard Mater. 2021 Jun 15;412:125231. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125231. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
This work evaluated the removal efficiency of 13 wastewater-borne pharmaceuticals in a pilot constructed wetland (CW) operated under different aeration strategies (no aeration, intermittent and continuous). Aeration improved the removal of conventional wastewater parameters and the targeted micropollutants, compared to the non-aerated treatment. Reduction of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total nitrogen (TN) was slightly higher applying intermittent aeration than applying continuous aeration, the opposite was observed for the investigated pharmaceuticals. Seven targeted compounds were found in influent wastewater, and five of them (acetaminophen, diclofenac, ketoprofen, bezafibrate and gemfibrozil) were efficiently removed (> 83%) in the aerated systems. The overall risk of the investigated samples against aquatic ecosystems was moderate, decreasing in the order influent > no aeration > intermittent aeration > continuous aeration, based on the hazard quotient approach. Lorazepam, diclofenac and ketoprofen were the pharmaceuticals that could contribute the most to this potential environmental impact of the CW effluents after discharge. To the authors' knowledge this is the first sound study on the removal and fate of ketoprofen, bezafibrate, and lorazepam in aerated CWs, and provides additional evidence on the removal and fate of acetaminophen, diclofenac, gemfibrozil, and carbamazepine in this type of bioremediation systems at pilot plant scale.
本研究评估了在不同曝气策略(无曝气、间歇曝气和连续曝气)下运行的人工湿地(CW)对 13 种废水中药物的去除效率。与未曝气处理相比,曝气提高了常规废水参数和目标微量污染物的去除率。与连续曝气相比,间歇曝气对化学需氧量(COD)和总氮(TN)的去除略有提高,而对于所研究的药物则相反。进水废水中发现了七种目标化合物,其中五种(对乙酰氨基酚、双氯芬酸、酮洛芬、贝扎贝特和吉非贝齐)在曝气系统中得到了有效去除(>83%)。基于危害商数方法,根据调查样本对水生生态系统的总体风险为中等,顺序为进水>无曝气>间歇曝气>连续曝气。根据危害商数方法,根据调查样本对水生生态系统的总体风险为中等,顺序为进水>无曝气>间歇曝气>连续曝气。根据危害商数方法,根据调查样本对水生生态系统的总体风险为中等,顺序为进水>无曝气>间歇曝气>连续曝气。根据危害商数方法,根据调查样本对水生生态系统的总体风险为中等,顺序为进水>无曝气>间歇曝气>连续曝气。劳拉西泮、双氯芬酸和酮洛芬是这些 CW 出水可能对环境造成潜在影响的主要药物。据作者所知,这是首次对曝气 CW 中酮洛芬、贝扎贝特和劳拉西泮的去除和归宿进行的可靠研究,并为该类型生物修复系统中对乙酰氨基酚、双氯芬酸、吉非贝齐和卡马西平的去除和归宿提供了额外的证据。