Suppr超能文献

保守治疗在与腱病相关的肩痛中的疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。

Effectiveness of conservative therapy in tendinopathy-related shoulder pain: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation and Functional Performance, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Diamantina, Brazil.

Department of Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Diamantina, Brazil.

出版信息

Phys Ther Sport. 2021 May;49:15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.01.010. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Systematic review investigated efficacy of conservative therapy on pain and function in people with tendinopathy-related shoulder pain.

METHODS

Searches were conducted on six databases. All randomized controlled trials investigating efficacy of any conservative therapy on pain and function in people with tendinopathy-related shoulder pain were included. Estimates for each specific conservative therapy were presented as weighted mean differences (WMDs) or mean differences (MDs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE.

RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials were included. Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT) was effective on pain at short-term (i.e., ≤3 months) when compared with control (WMD = -1.7 out of 101 points, -3.1 to -0.3; n = 158). Individual trials also suggested effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (-13.7 to -2.3; n = 365) and extracorporeal radial pressure pulse therapy (rESWT) (-40.0 to -27.0; n = 79). Laser therapy and ESWT were not effective on pain and function at short-term, respectively. No trials investigated medium- or long-term effects, and quality of the evidence ranged from low to very low quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Conservative therapies currently available for the rotator cuff management and biceps tendinopathy are not supported by low to very-low quality evidence.

摘要

目的

系统评价调查了保守治疗对与肌腱病相关的肩痛患者疼痛和功能的疗效。

方法

在六个数据库中进行了检索。纳入了所有研究任何保守治疗对与肌腱病相关的肩痛患者疼痛和功能疗效的随机对照试验。对每种特定保守治疗的估计值以加权均数差(WMD)或均数差(MD)表示,并附有 95%置信区间(CI)。使用 GRADE 评估证据质量。

结果

纳入了五项随机对照试验。体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)在短期(即≤3 个月)时在疼痛方面优于对照组(WMD=-1.7 分,范围为-3.1 至-0.3;n=158)。个别试验还表明非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)(-13.7 至-2.3;n=365)和体外径向压力脉冲疗法(rESWT)(-40.0 至-27.0;n=79)有效。激光治疗和 ESWT 在短期对疼痛和功能均无效果。没有试验调查中短期或长期效果,证据质量从低到极低。

结论

目前用于肩袖管理和肱二头肌肌腱病的保守治疗方法没有得到低到极低质量证据的支持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验