Kamonseki Danilo Harudy, da Rocha Gerdeany Mendes, Ferreira Victor Matheus Leite Mascarenhas, Ocarino Juliana Melo, Pogetti Lívia Silveira
From the Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil (DHK); Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Science, Physical Therapy Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil (GMdR, VMLMF, JMO, LSP); and Univesidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil (LSP).
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Jun 1;103(6):471-479. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002361. Epub 2023 Oct 28.
The aim of the systematically review the short-, intermediate-, and long-term effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy on pain intensity and shoulder function in individuals with noncalcific rotator cuff tendinopathy.
The MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Embase were searched from inception up to June 2023. We included randomized controlled trials that investigated the effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy on pain intensity and shoulder function.
Nine studies were included with a total sample of 543 individuals. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy was superior to sham extracorporeal shockwave therapy in improving pain intensity at short-term follow-up (standardized mean difference = -0.28; 95% confidence interval, -0.55 to -0.01). Extracorporeal shockwave therapy was not superior to sham extracorporeal shockwave therapy in improving pain intensity at intermediate- and long-term follow-ups ( P > 0.05). Extracorporeal shockwave therapy was not superior to other treatments in improving pain intensity at short- and intermediate-term follow-ups ( P > 0.05). Extracorporeal shockwave therapy was not superior to sham extracorporeal shockwave therapy and other treatments in improving shoulder function at short-, intermediate-, and long-term follow-ups ( P > 0.05).
Moderate-certainty evidence indicated that extracorporeal shockwave therapy showed small improvement in shoulder pain over sham extracorporeal shockwave therapy at short-term follow-up. In addition, extracorporeal shockwave therapy was not superior to sham extracorporeal shockwave therapy in improving function, and it was not superior to other treatments in improving shoulder pain and function.
系统评价体外冲击波疗法对非钙化性肩袖肌腱病患者疼痛强度和肩部功能的短期、中期和长期影响。
检索MEDLINE、CINAHL、SPORTDiscus和Embase数据库,检索时间从建库至2023年6月。我们纳入了研究体外冲击波疗法对疼痛强度和肩部功能影响的随机对照试验。
纳入9项研究,共543例患者。在短期随访中,体外冲击波疗法在改善疼痛强度方面优于假体外冲击波疗法(标准化均数差=-0.28;95%置信区间,-0.55至-0.01)。在中期和长期随访中,体外冲击波疗法在改善疼痛强度方面并不优于假体外冲击波疗法(P>0.05)。在短期和中期随访中,体外冲击波疗法在改善疼痛强度方面并不优于其他治疗方法(P>0.05)。在短期、中期和长期随访中,体外冲击波疗法在改善肩部功能方面并不优于假体外冲击波疗法和其他治疗方法(P>0.05)。
中等确定性证据表明,在短期随访中,体外冲击波疗法比假体外冲击波疗法在改善肩部疼痛方面有小幅改善。此外,体外冲击波疗法在改善功能方面并不优于假体外冲击波疗法,在改善肩部疼痛和功能方面也不优于其他治疗方法。