• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床医生对向 50-70 岁澳大利亚人推荐阿司匹林预防结直肠癌的意见:一项定性研究。

Clinicians' opinions on recommending aspirin to prevent colorectal cancer to Australians aged 50-70 years: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 5;11(2):e042261. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042261.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042261
PMID:33550247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7925937/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Australian guidelines recommend all adults aged 50-70 years old without existing contraindications consider taking low-dose aspirin (100-300 mg per day) for at least 2.5 years to reduce their risk of developing colorectal cancer. We aimed to explore clinicians' practices, knowledge, opinions, and barriers and facilitators to the implementation of these new guidelines.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews were conducted with clinicians to whom the new guidelines may be applicable (Familial Cancer Clinic staff (geneticists, oncologists and genetic counsellors), gastroenterologists, pharmacists and general practitioners (GPs)). The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) underpinned the development of the interview guide. Coding was inductive and themes were developed through consensus between the authors. Emerging themes were mapped onto the CFIR domains: characteristics of the intervention, outer setting, inner setting, individual characteristics and process.

RESULTS

Sixty-four interviews were completed between March and October 2019. Aspirin was viewed as a safe and cheap option for cancer prevention. GPs were considered by all clinicians as the most important health professionals for implementation of the guidelines. Cancer Council Australia, as a trusted organisation, was an important facilitator to guideline adoption. Uncertainty about aspirin dosage and perceived strength of the evidence, precise wording of the recommendation, previous changes to guidelines about aspirin and conflicting findings from trials in older populations were barriers to implementation.

CONCLUSION

Widespread adoption of these new guidelines could be an important strategy to reduce the incidence of bowel cancer, but this will require more active implementation strategies focused on primary care and the wider community.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620001003965).

摘要

目的

澳大利亚指南建议所有无禁忌症的 50-70 岁成年人考虑服用低剂量阿司匹林(每天 100-300 毫克)至少 2.5 年,以降低患结直肠癌的风险。我们旨在探讨临床医生的实践、知识、意见以及实施这些新指南的障碍和促进因素。

方法

对可能适用新指南的临床医生(家族癌症诊所工作人员(遗传学家、肿瘤学家和遗传咨询师)、胃肠病学家、药剂师和全科医生(GP))进行半结构化访谈。实施研究整合框架(CFIR)为访谈指南的制定提供了基础。编码是归纳性的,主题是通过作者之间的共识开发的。新兴主题被映射到 CFIR 领域:干预措施的特征、外部环境、内部环境、个体特征和过程。

结果

2019 年 3 月至 10 月期间完成了 64 次访谈。阿司匹林被所有临床医生视为预防癌症的安全且廉价的选择。全科医生被所有临床医生认为是实施指南的最重要的卫生专业人员。澳大利亚癌症协会作为一个值得信赖的组织,是指南采用的重要促进因素。对阿司匹林剂量和证据强度的不确定性、建议的确切措辞、以前关于阿司匹林的指南变化以及在老年人群中试验的相互矛盾的结果,是实施的障碍。

结论

广泛采用这些新指南可能是降低肠癌发病率的重要策略,但这需要更积极的实施策略,重点关注初级保健和更广泛的社区。

试验注册号

澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12620001003965)。

相似文献

1
Clinicians' opinions on recommending aspirin to prevent colorectal cancer to Australians aged 50-70 years: a qualitative study.临床医生对向 50-70 岁澳大利亚人推荐阿司匹林预防结直肠癌的意见:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 5;11(2):e042261. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042261.
2
Designing a decision aid for cancer prevention: a qualitative study.设计癌症预防决策辅助工具:一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2024 Jun 12;41(3):349-359. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad042.
3
Should I take aspirin? A qualitative study on the implementation of a decision aid on taking aspirin for bowel cancer prevention.我应该服用阿司匹林吗?一项关于实施阿司匹林预防肠癌决策辅助工具的定性研究。
Fam Med Community Health. 2023 Nov 30;11(Suppl 1):e002423. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2023-002423.
4
Exploring a novel method for optimising the implementation of a colorectal cancer risk prediction tool into primary care: a qualitative study.探索一种将结直肠癌风险预测工具优化应用于初级保健的新方法:一项定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2022 May 12;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01205-8.
5
Exploring clinicians' attitudes about using aspirin for risk reduction in people with Lynch Syndrome with no personal diagnosis of colorectal cancer.探究临床医生对于在未个人诊断为结直肠癌的林奇综合征患者中使用阿司匹林进行风险降低的态度。
Fam Cancer. 2017 Jan;16(1):99-109. doi: 10.1007/s10689-016-9933-1.
6
An RCT of a decision aid to support informed choices about taking aspirin to prevent colorectal cancer and other chronic diseases: a study protocol for the SITA (Should I Take Aspirin?) trial.一项关于决策辅助工具的 RCT,以支持关于服用阿司匹林预防结直肠癌和其他慢性疾病的知情选择:SITA(我应该服用阿司匹林吗?)试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Jul 15;22(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05365-8.
7
General practice perspectives on a bowel cancer screening quality improvement intervention using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.利用实施研究综合框架提高结直肠癌筛查质量的改善干预措施:全科医学视角
Public Health Res Pract. 2021 Sep 8;31(3):30452016. doi: 10.17061/phrp30452016.
8
Benefits and harms of aspirin to reduce colorectal cancer risk: a cross-sectional study of methods to communicate risk in primary care.阿司匹林降低结直肠癌风险的获益与危害:初级保健中沟通风险方法的横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Nov 28;69(689):e843-e849. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X706613. Print 2019 Dec.
9
Barriers and facilitators to HPV vaccination in primary care practices: a mixed methods study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.初级保健机构中HPV疫苗接种的障碍与促进因素:一项运用整合性实施研究框架的混合方法研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 May 7;19(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0750-5.
10
Application of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to assess factors that may influence implementation of tobacco use treatment guidelines in the Viet Nam public health care delivery system.应用实施研究综合框架评估可能影响越南公共卫生保健系统中烟草使用治疗指南实施的因素。
Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 28;12(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0558-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Designing a decision aid for cancer prevention: a qualitative study.设计癌症预防决策辅助工具:一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2024 Jun 12;41(3):349-359. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad042.
2
GPs' willingness to prescribe aspirin for cancer preventive therapy in Lynch syndrome: a factorial randomised trial investigating factors influencing decisions.全科医生对林奇综合征患者进行阿司匹林癌症预防治疗的意愿:一项影响决策因素的析因随机试验
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Mar 30;73(729):e302-e309. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0610. Print 2023 Apr.
3
Barriers and facilitators to using aspirin for preventive therapy: a qualitative study exploring the views and experiences of people with Lynch syndrome and healthcare providers.使用阿司匹林进行预防性治疗的障碍与促进因素:一项探索林奇综合征患者及医疗服务提供者观点和经历的定性研究
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2022 Aug 23;20(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13053-022-00235-z.
4
Aspirin Colorectal Cancer Prevention in Lynch Syndrome: Recommendations in the Era of Precision Medicine.阿司匹林在林奇综合征结直肠癌预防中的应用:精准医学时代的建议。
Genes (Basel). 2022 Mar 3;13(3):460. doi: 10.3390/genes13030460.
5
Aspirin use for cancer prevention: A systematic review of public, patient and healthcare provider attitudes and adherence behaviours.阿司匹林用于癌症预防:公众、患者和医疗保健提供者态度及依从性行为的系统评价。
Prev Med. 2022 Jan;154:106872. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106872. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
6
An RCT of a decision aid to support informed choices about taking aspirin to prevent colorectal cancer and other chronic diseases: a study protocol for the SITA (Should I Take Aspirin?) trial.一项关于决策辅助工具的 RCT,以支持关于服用阿司匹林预防结直肠癌和其他慢性疾病的知情选择:SITA(我应该服用阿司匹林吗?)试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Jul 15;22(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05365-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors Influencing Uptake of Changes to Clinical Preventive Guidelines.影响临床预防指南变更采纳的因素。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Mar-Apr;33(2):271-278. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.02.190146.
2
Benefits and harms of aspirin to reduce colorectal cancer risk: a cross-sectional study of methods to communicate risk in primary care.阿司匹林降低结直肠癌风险的获益与危害:初级保健中沟通风险方法的横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Nov 28;69(689):e843-e849. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X706613. Print 2019 Dec.
3
Effect of Aspirin on Disability-free Survival in the Healthy Elderly.阿司匹林对健康老年人无残疾生存的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Oct 18;379(16):1499-1508. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800722. Epub 2018 Sep 16.
4
Effect of Aspirin on All-Cause Mortality in the Healthy Elderly.阿司匹林对健康老年人全因死亡率的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Oct 18;379(16):1519-1528. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803955. Epub 2018 Sep 16.
5
Evidence use in decision-making on introducing innovations: a systematic scoping review with stakeholder feedback.循证决策中创新引入的证据应用:基于利益相关者反馈的系统范围界定综述。
Implement Sci. 2017 Dec 4;12(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0669-6.
6
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
7
Baseline Characteristics of Participants in the ASPREE (ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly) Study.ASPREE(阿司匹林减少老年人事件)研究参与者的基线特征。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017 Oct 12;72(11):1586-1593. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glw342.
8
Perceptions and Utilization of Lung Cancer Screening Among Primary Care Physicians.基层医疗医生对肺癌筛查的认知与应用
J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Nov;11(11):1856-1862. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
9
Aspirin Use for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Colorectal Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.阿司匹林用于心血管疾病和结直肠癌的一级预防:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Jun 21;164(12):836-45. doi: 10.7326/M16-0577. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
10
Guide to clinical practice guidelines: the current state of play.临床实践指南指南:当前的进展情况。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Feb;28(1):122-8. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv115. Epub 2016 Jan 20.