• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿司匹林降低结直肠癌风险的获益与危害:初级保健中沟通风险方法的横断面研究。

Benefits and harms of aspirin to reduce colorectal cancer risk: a cross-sectional study of methods to communicate risk in primary care.

机构信息

Centre for Cancer Research, Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Nov 28;69(689):e843-e849. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X706613. Print 2019 Dec.

DOI:10.3399/bjgp19X706613
PMID:31740461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6863681/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

New Australian guidelines recommend that GPs actively consider prescribing low-dose aspirin to patients aged 50-70 years to reduce their risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients and GPs need to understand the relative benefits and harms to support informed decision making.

AIM

To develop and examine different methods to communicate the benefits and harms of taking aspirin for CRC prevention.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A cross-sectional, vignette study with patients aged 50-70 years consecutively recruited from general practices in Melbourne, Australia, between July and August 2018.

METHOD

Summary estimates from meta-analyses of the effects of aspirin on the incidence of CRC, cardiovascular disease, gastrointestinal bleeding, and incidence rates in the Australian population to estimate outcomes in a hypothetical population of 10 000 people aged 50-70 years. These estimates were presented using four different risk communication formats. Participants were shown these different formats and asked if they would take aspirin to prevent CRC.

RESULTS

A total of 313 participants were recruited (95.1% recruitment rate), of whom 304 completed the study. Most participants (71.7-75.3%) reported they would take aspirin irrespective of risk format presented. Bar charts (odds ratio [OR] 1.20, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 1.01 to 1.44) and expected frequency trees (OR 1.18, 95% CI = 0.99 to 1.41) were more strongly associated with the intentions to take aspirin compared with icon arrays. Bar charts were most preferred for presenting risk information.

CONCLUSION

A large proportion of participants in this study intended to take aspirin to reduce their CRC risk regardless of risk communication format. Bar charts and expected frequency trees were the preferred methods to present the benefits and harms of taking aspirin to prevent CRC.

摘要

背景

新的澳大利亚指南建议全科医生积极考虑为 50-70 岁的患者开低剂量阿司匹林,以降低他们患结直肠癌(CRC)的风险。患者和全科医生需要了解相对的益处和危害,以支持知情决策。

目的

开发和检验不同的方法来传达服用阿司匹林预防 CRC 的益处和危害。

设计和设置

这是一项在澳大利亚墨尔本的普通诊所招募 50-70 岁患者的横断面、病例系列研究,招募时间为 2018 年 7 月至 8 月。

方法

使用荟萃分析的汇总估计数,评估阿司匹林对 CRC、心血管疾病、胃肠道出血和澳大利亚人群发病率的影响,以估计在一个假设的 10000 名 50-70 岁人群中的结果。这些估计数使用四种不同的风险沟通格式呈现。向参与者展示这些不同的格式,并询问他们是否会服用阿司匹林来预防 CRC。

结果

共招募了 313 名参与者(招募率为 95.1%),其中 304 名完成了研究。大多数参与者(71.7-75.3%)表示无论呈现何种风险格式,他们都会服用阿司匹林。条形图(比值比 [OR] 1.20,95%置信区间 [CI] = 1.01 至 1.44)和预期频率树(OR 1.18,95%CI = 0.99 至 1.41)与服用阿司匹林的意图更相关,而图标数组则不然。条形图是呈现风险信息的首选方法。

结论

在这项研究中,很大一部分参与者无论风险沟通格式如何,都打算服用阿司匹林来降低他们的 CRC 风险。条形图和预期频率树是呈现服用阿司匹林预防 CRC 的益处和危害的首选方法。

相似文献

1
Benefits and harms of aspirin to reduce colorectal cancer risk: a cross-sectional study of methods to communicate risk in primary care.阿司匹林降低结直肠癌风险的获益与危害:初级保健中沟通风险方法的横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Nov 28;69(689):e843-e849. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X706613. Print 2019 Dec.
2
Should I Take Aspirin? (SITA): randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for cancer chemoprevention.是否应该服用阿司匹林?(SITA):癌症化学预防决策辅助工具的随机对照试验。
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Jul 25;74(745):e498-e507. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0385. Print 2024 Aug.
3
Benefits and harms of selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) to reduce breast cancer risk: a cross-sectional study of methods to communicate risk in primary care.选择性雌激素受体调节剂(SERMs)降低乳腺癌风险的获益与危害:初级保健中沟通风险方法的横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Nov 28;69(689):e836-e842. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X706841. Print 2019 Dec.
4
Designing a decision aid for cancer prevention: a qualitative study.设计癌症预防决策辅助工具:一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2024 Jun 12;41(3):349-359. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad042.
5
An RCT of a decision aid to support informed choices about taking aspirin to prevent colorectal cancer and other chronic diseases: a study protocol for the SITA (Should I Take Aspirin?) trial.一项关于决策辅助工具的 RCT,以支持关于服用阿司匹林预防结直肠癌和其他慢性疾病的知情选择:SITA(我应该服用阿司匹林吗?)试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Jul 15;22(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05365-8.
6
Aspirin Use for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Colorectal Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.阿司匹林用于心血管疾病和结直肠癌的一级预防:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Jun 21;164(12):836-45. doi: 10.7326/M16-0577. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
7
Patient preferences for the chemoprevention of colorectal cancer.患者对结直肠癌化学预防的偏好。
Dig Dis Sci. 2009 Oct;54(10):2207-14. doi: 10.1007/s10620-008-0609-z. Epub 2008 Dec 5.
8
Aspirin for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Colorectal Cancer: A Decision Analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.阿司匹林用于心血管疾病和结直肠癌的一级预防:美国预防服务工作组的决策分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Jun 21;164(12):777-86. doi: 10.7326/M15-2129. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
9
Aspirin Use to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease and Colorectal Cancer: Updated Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.阿司匹林用于预防心血管疾病和结直肠癌:美国预防服务工作组的更新建模研究。
JAMA. 2022 Apr 26;327(16):1598-1607. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.3385.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptability of aspirin for cancer preventive therapy: a survey and qualitative study exploring the views of the UK general population.阿司匹林用于癌症预防治疗的可接受性:一项调查和定性研究,旨在探讨英国普通民众的观点。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 18;13(12):e078703. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078703.
2
Designing a decision aid for cancer prevention: a qualitative study.设计癌症预防决策辅助工具:一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2024 Jun 12;41(3):349-359. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad042.
3
Aspirin use for cancer prevention: A systematic review of public, patient and healthcare provider attitudes and adherence behaviours.阿司匹林用于癌症预防:公众、患者和医疗保健提供者态度及依从性行为的系统评价。
Prev Med. 2022 Jan;154:106872. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106872. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
4
An RCT of a decision aid to support informed choices about taking aspirin to prevent colorectal cancer and other chronic diseases: a study protocol for the SITA (Should I Take Aspirin?) trial.一项关于决策辅助工具的 RCT,以支持关于服用阿司匹林预防结直肠癌和其他慢性疾病的知情选择:SITA(我应该服用阿司匹林吗?)试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Jul 15;22(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05365-8.
5
Development and user-testing of a brief decision aid for aspirin as a preventive approach alongside colorectal cancer screening.开发并测试一种简短的决策辅助工具,用于在结直肠癌筛查的同时作为预防方法使用阿司匹林。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 May 20;21(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01523-9.
6
Clinicians' opinions on recommending aspirin to prevent colorectal cancer to Australians aged 50-70 years: a qualitative study.临床医生对向 50-70 岁澳大利亚人推荐阿司匹林预防结直肠癌的意见:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 5;11(2):e042261. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042261.

本文引用的文献

1
Benefits and harms of selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) to reduce breast cancer risk: a cross-sectional study of methods to communicate risk in primary care.选择性雌激素受体调节剂(SERMs)降低乳腺癌风险的获益与危害:初级保健中沟通风险方法的横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Nov 28;69(689):e836-e842. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X706841. Print 2019 Dec.
2
Chemoprevention: A new concept for cancer prevention in primary care.化学预防:初级保健中癌症预防的新概念。
Aust J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;47(12):825-828. doi: 10.31128/AJGP-07-18-4644.
3
The CRISP-Q study: Communicating the risks and benefits of colorectal cancer screening.CRISP-Q 研究:结直肠癌筛查的风险和获益沟通。
Aust J Gen Pract. 2018 Mar;47(3):139-145. doi: 10.31128/AFP-04-17-4195.
4
Utilization of Continuous "Spinners" to Communicate Risk.利用连续“旋转器”传达风险。
Med Decis Making. 2017 Aug;37(6):725-729. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17707198. Epub 2017 May 10.
5
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
6
Designing Visual Aids That Promote Risk Literacy: A Systematic Review of Health Research and Evidence-Based Design Heuristics.设计促进风险素养的视觉辅助工具:健康研究与循证设计启发法的系统综述
Hum Factors. 2017 Jun;59(4):582-627. doi: 10.1177/0018720817690634. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
7
Understanding the Harms and Benefits of Cancer Screening: A Model of Factors That Shape Informed Decision Making.了解癌症筛查的危害与益处:一个塑造明智决策的因素模型。
Med Decis Making. 2015 Oct;35(7):847-58. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15587676. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
8
Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.全球癌症发病与死亡:GLOBOCAN 2012 数据源、方法与主要模式。
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
9
Estimates of benefits and harms of prophylactic use of aspirin in the general population.普通人群预防性使用阿司匹林的利弊评估。
Ann Oncol. 2015 Jan;26(1):47-57. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu225. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
10
Exploring consumer opinions on the presentation of side-effects information in Australian Consumer Medicine Information leaflets.探索消费者对澳大利亚消费者用药信息手册中副作用信息呈现方式的看法。
Health Expect. 2016 Jun;19(3):543-56. doi: 10.1111/hex.12215. Epub 2014 Jun 6.