• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2020 年急性心肌梗死质量指标更新:急性心血管护理协会立场文件:ACVC 质量指标研究组和 NSTE-ACS 指南组。

2020 Update of the quality indicators for acute myocardial infarction: a position paper of the Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care: the study group for quality indicators from the ACVC and the NSTE-ACS guideline group.

机构信息

University Hospital Besancon, Boulevard Fleming, 25000 Besancon, France.

University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021 Apr 8;10(2):224-233. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaa037.

DOI:10.1093/ehjacc/zuaa037
PMID:33550362
Abstract

AIMS

Quality indicators (QIs) are tools to improve the delivery of evidence-base medicine. In 2017, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care (ACVC) developed a set of QIs for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), which have been evaluated at national and international levels and across different populations. However, an update of these QIs is needed in light of the accumulated experience and the changes in the supporting evidence.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The ESC methodology for the QI development was used to update the 2017 ACVC QIs. We identified key domains of AMI care, conducted a literature review, developed a list of candidate QIs, and used a modified Delphi method to select the final set of indicators. The same seven domains of AMI care identified by the 2017 Study Group were retained for this update. For each domain, main and secondary QIs were developed reflecting the essential and complementary aspects of care, respectively. Overall, 26 QIs are proposed in this document, compared to 20 in the 2017 set. New QIs are proposed in this document (e.g. the centre use of high-sensitivity troponin), some were retained or modified (e.g. the in-hospital risk assessment), and others were retired in accordance with the changes in evidence [e.g. the proportion of patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) treated with fondaparinux] and the feasibility assessments (e.g. the proportion of patients with NSTEMI whom risk assessment is performed using the GRACE and CRUSADE risk scores).

CONCLUSION

Updated QIs for the management of AMI were developed according to contemporary knowledge and accumulated experience. These QIs may be applied to evaluate and improve the quality of AMI care.

摘要

目的

质量指标(QIs)是提高循证医学实践的工具。2017 年,欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)急性心血管护理协会(ACVC)为急性心肌梗死(AMI)制定了一套 QIs,这些 QIs 已经在国家和国际层面以及不同人群中进行了评估。然而,鉴于积累的经验和支持证据的变化,这些 QIs 需要更新。

方法和结果

我们使用 ESC 的 QI 开发方法更新了 2017 年 ACVC 的 QIs。我们确定了 AMI 护理的关键领域,进行了文献回顾,制定了候选 QIs 列表,并使用改良 Delphi 方法选择最终的指标集。2017 年研究小组确定的七个 AMI 护理领域在本次更新中得以保留。对于每个领域,主要和次要 QIs 分别反映了护理的基本和补充方面。总的来说,本文件提出了 26 个 QIs,而 2017 年的文件中提出了 20 个。本文件中提出了一些新的 QIs(例如,中心使用高敏肌钙蛋白),一些被保留或修改(例如,院内风险评估),其他则根据证据变化(例如,接受非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)治疗的患者比例,使用依诺肝素)和可行性评估(例如,使用 GRACE 和 CRUSADE 风险评分对 NSTEMI 患者进行风险评估的比例)而退役。

结论

根据当代知识和积累的经验,制定了更新的 AMI 管理 QIs。这些 QIs 可用于评估和改善 AMI 护理质量。

相似文献

1
2020 Update of the quality indicators for acute myocardial infarction: a position paper of the Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care: the study group for quality indicators from the ACVC and the NSTE-ACS guideline group.2020 年急性心肌梗死质量指标更新:急性心血管护理协会立场文件:ACVC 质量指标研究组和 NSTE-ACS 指南组。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021 Apr 8;10(2):224-233. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaa037.
2
Performance of hospitals according to the ESC ACCA quality indicators and 30-day mortality for acute myocardial infarction: national cohort study using the United Kingdom Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) register.根据欧洲心脏病学会急性冠状动脉综合征质量指标评估医院表现及急性心肌梗死的30天死亡率:使用英国心肌缺血国家审计项目(MINAP)登记册的全国队列研究
Eur Heart J. 2017 Apr 1;38(13):974-982. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx008.
3
Assessment of the ESC quality indicators in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review.评估急性心肌梗死患者的 ESC 质量指标:系统评价。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021 Oct 27;10(8):878-889. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuab042.
4
Quality indicators for acute myocardial infarction: A position paper of the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association.急性心肌梗死的质量指标:急性心血管护理协会立场文件
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2017 Feb;6(1):34-59. doi: 10.1177/2048872616643053. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
5
Assessment of Quality Indicators for Acute Myocardial Infarction in the FAST-MI (French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation or Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Registries.法国急性ST段抬高或非ST段抬高型心肌梗死注册研究(FAST-MI)中急性心肌梗死质量指标的评估
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Jun;10(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003336.
6
The 2020 ESC-ACVC quality indicators for the management of acute myocardial infarction applied to the FAST-MI registries.2020 年 ESC-ACVC 急性心肌梗死管理质量指标应用于 FAST-MI 注册研究。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021 Apr 8;10(2):207-215. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuab010.
7
European Society of Cardiology Quality Indicators for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: developed by the Working Group for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Quality Indicators in collaboration with the European Association for Preventive Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.欧洲心脏病学会心血管疾病预防质量指标:由心血管疾病预防质量指标工作组与欧洲心脏病学会欧洲预防心脏病学协会合作制定。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022 May 25;29(7):1060-1071. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwab160.
8
European Society of Cardiology Quality Indicators for the care and outcomes of cardiac pacing: developed by the Working Group for Cardiac Pacing Quality Indicators in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology.欧洲心脏病学会心脏起搏护理和结局质量指标:由心脏起搏质量指标工作组与欧洲心脏病学会的欧洲心律协会合作制定。
Europace. 2022 Jan 4;24(1):165-172. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab193.
9
International comparison of acute myocardial infarction care and outcomes using quality indicators.国际急性心肌梗死护理质量指标比较及结果分析。
Heart. 2019 Jun;105(11):820-825. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314197. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
10
Contemporary NSTEMI management: the role of the hospitalist.当代非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的管理:住院医师的作用。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2020 Feb;48(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2020.1701329. Epub 2020 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Dapagliflozin improves cardiac function and reduces adverse events in myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis in diabetic and non-diabetic populations.达格列净改善心肌梗死后的心功能并减少不良事件:糖尿病和非糖尿病人群的荟萃分析
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 4;16:1594861. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1594861. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of In-Hospital Quality of Care Improvement Initiative on Secondary Prevention of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Six Months After Patient Discharge: A Large Stepped Wedge- and Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.住院期间护理质量改善举措对患者出院后六个月急性冠状动脉综合征二级预防的影响:一项大型阶梯楔形和整群随机对照试验。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2025 May;18(5):e011441. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011441. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
3
The Lancet Commission on rethinking coronary artery disease: moving from ischaemia to atheroma.《柳叶刀》冠心病重新思考委员会:从缺血到动脉粥样硬化的转变
Lancet. 2025 Apr 12;405(10486):1264-1312. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00055-8. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
4
15-Year trends, predictors, and outcomes of heart failure hospitalization complicating first acute myocardial infarction in the modern percutaneous coronary intervention era.现代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时代首次急性心肌梗死并发心力衰竭住院的15年趋势、预测因素及结局
Eur Heart J Open. 2025 Feb 19;5(2):oeaf013. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf013. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Variation in Likelihood of Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Among US Hospitals.美国医院中ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗可能性的差异
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Mar 4;14(5):e038317. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.038317. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
6
Quality indicators for improved cardiovascular care: learnings from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.改善心血管护理的质量指标:来自英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所的经验教训。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2025 Jun 23;11(4):489-492. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae097.
7
Addressing disparities in the long-term mortality risk in individuals with non-ST segment myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) by diabetes mellitus status: a nationwide cohort study.针对伴有非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)的个体中糖尿病状态对长期死亡率风险差异的处理:一项全国性队列研究。
Diabetologia. 2024 Dec;67(12):2711-2725. doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06281-7. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
8
COVID-19 and myocardial injury: Targeting elevated biomarkers for potential novel therapies.COVID-19 与心肌损伤:针对升高的生物标志物寻找潜在的新型治疗方法。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2024 Aug 27;79:100473. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100473. eCollection 2024.
9
What US Cardiology Can Learn From the 2023 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes.美国心脏病学可从《2023年欧洲心脏病学会急性冠状动脉综合征管理指南》中学到什么。
Clin Cardiol. 2024 Aug;47(8):e24329. doi: 10.1002/clc.24329.
10
Secondary Prevention after Myocardial Infarction: What to Do and Where to Do It.心肌梗死后的二级预防:做什么及在哪里做
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jun 8;23(6):210. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2306210. eCollection 2022 Jun.