Moquet B, Cosnay P, Fauchier J P, Rouesnel P, Mannara R, Rioux P, Doll G
Service de Cardiologie B, Hôpital Trousseau, Tours.
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1988 Feb;37(2):53-9.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of trans-esophageal atrial stimulation in decreasing atrial flutters. 31 patients, aged between 26 and 86 years, underwent 38 esophageal stimulations between August 1986 and April 1987. Esophageal stimulation was carried out with a device delivering major stimuli (10 to 20 ms) as well as high voltages (10 to 20 volts). A bipolar probe of permanent intracardiac stimulation was placed behind the left atrium, via a trans-esophageal approach under ECG guidance. Stimulations were carried out at a slightly faster rhythm than that of the atrial flutter, for 1 to 30 seconds with a progressive increase of the stimulation frequency (280 to 960 impulses/min) until either a sinus rhythm or an atrial fibrillation was obtained. A sinus rhythm was obtained immediately (21 times out of 38; 55.3%) and at the 24th hour after temporary atrial fibrillation in 8 additional patients (21%). The reduction percentage at 24 hours was therefore 76.3 p. cent. In 6 patients (15.8%), esophageal stimulation failed and in 3 additional patients, after atrial fibrillation, there was either relapse into flutter, or persistence of atrial fibrillation at the 24th hour. Esophageal stimulation was well tolerated in all cases. There were no local or rhythm complications. In conclusion, trans-esophageal atrial stimulation appears to be effective, easy to implement, economical and well tolerated. Its primary use to decrease atrial flutter seems justified, permitting to avoid in 75 p. cent of the time, recourse to intracardiac atrial stimulation or external shock.
本研究的目的是评估经食管心房刺激在减少心房扑动方面的有效性。1986年8月至1987年4月期间,31名年龄在26至86岁之间的患者接受了38次食管刺激。食管刺激通过一种能提供主要刺激(10至20毫秒)以及高电压(10至20伏)的装置进行。在心电图引导下,通过经食管途径将永久性心内刺激的双极探头置于左心房后方。刺激以略快于心房扑动的节律进行,持续1至30秒,刺激频率逐渐增加(280至960次/分钟),直至获得窦性心律或心房颤动。立即获得窦性心律的有38次中的21次(55.3%),另有8名患者在短暂性心房颤动后的第24小时获得窦性心律(21%)。因此,24小时时的减少百分比为76.3%。6名患者(15.8%)食管刺激失败,另有3名患者在心房颤动后,在第24小时出现扑动复发或心房颤动持续存在。所有病例对食管刺激的耐受性良好。没有局部或节律性并发症。总之,经食管心房刺激似乎是有效的、易于实施、经济且耐受性良好。其减少心房扑动的主要用途似乎是合理的,75%的情况下可避免采用心内心房刺激或体外电击。