Yeom Hojin, Hwang Sung-Hee, Han Byeal-I, Lee Michael
Division of Life Sciences, College of Life Sciences and Bioengineering, Incheon National University, Incheon 22012, Republic of Korea.
Institute for New Drug Development, Incheon National University, Incheon 22012, Republic of Korea.
Biomol Ther (Seoul). 2021 Jul 1;29(4):434-444. doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2020.203.
BRAF inhibitors are insufficient monotherapies for BRAF-mutated cancer; therefore, we investigated which inhibitory pathway would yield the most effective therapeutic approach when targeted in combination with BRAF inhibition. The oncogenic BRAF inhibitor, PLX4720, increased basal autophagic flux in BRAF-mutated cells compared to wild-type (WT) BRAF cells. Interestingly, early autophagy inhibition improved the effectiveness of PLX4720 regardless of BRAF mutation, whereas late autophagy inhibition did not. Although ATG5 knockout led to PLX4720 resistance in both WT and BRAF-mutated cells, the MEK inhibitor trametinib exhibited a synergistic effect on PLX4720 sensitivity in WT BRAF cells but not in BRAF-mutated cells. Conversely, the prolonged inhibition of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress reduced basal autophagy in BRAF-mutated cells, thereby increasing PLX4720 sensitivity. Taken together, our results suggest that the combined inhibition of ER stress and BRAF may simultaneously suppress both pro-survival ER stress and autophagy, and may therefore be suitable for treatment of BRAF-mutated tumors whose autophagy is increased by chronic ER stress. Similarly, for WT BRAF tumors, therapies targeting MEK signaling may be a more effective treatment strategy. Together, this study presents a rational combination treatment strategy to improve the efficacy of BRAF inhibitors depending on BRAF mutation status.
BRAF抑制剂对BRAF突变型癌症而言是不足够的单一疗法;因此,我们研究了与BRAF抑制联合靶向时,哪种抑制途径会产生最有效的治疗方法。致癌性BRAF抑制剂PLX4720与野生型(WT)BRAF细胞相比,增加了BRAF突变细胞中的基础自噬通量。有趣的是,早期自噬抑制提高了PLX4720的有效性,而与BRAF突变无关,而晚期自噬抑制则没有。尽管ATG5基因敲除导致WT和BRAF突变细胞对PLX4720产生抗性,但MEK抑制剂曲美替尼对WT BRAF细胞中的PLX4720敏感性表现出协同作用,而对BRAF突变细胞则没有。相反,内质网(ER)应激的长期抑制降低了BRAF突变细胞中的基础自噬,从而增加了PLX4720的敏感性。综上所述,我们的结果表明,ER应激和BRAF的联合抑制可能同时抑制促生存的ER应激和自噬,因此可能适用于治疗因慢性ER应激而自噬增加的BRAF突变肿瘤。同样,对于WT BRAF肿瘤,靶向MEK信号通路的疗法可能是一种更有效的治疗策略。总之,本研究提出了一种合理的联合治疗策略,可根据BRAF突变状态提高BRAF抑制剂的疗效。