Karumuri Srujana, Mandava Jyothi, Pamidimukkala Sahithi, Uppalapati Lakshman Varma, Konagala Ravi Kumar, Dasari Lohita
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, GITAM Dental College and Hospital, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
J Conserv Dent. 2020 May-Jun;23(3):265-269. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_182_20. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
The aim is to assess and compare the mineral gain and penetration depth of hydroxyapatite and silica nanoparticle infiltrates into artificially created erosive lesions of enamel and dentin.
Sixty extracted human molars were sectioned to obtain enamel and dentin samples ( = 60 each). They were demineralized using citric and formic acid, respectively, to create erosive lesions on enamel and dentin surfaces. Samples were assigned into nanohydroxyapatite (nHA) or nanosilica groups ( = 30 each) according to the infiltrant used. Half of the enamel and dentin samples in each group ( = 15) were analyzed after erosive attack for mineral loss, after infiltrant application for mineral gain, using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. In another half of the enamel and dentin samples ( = 15), the penetration depth of the nanoinfiltrants was analyzed using confocal microscopy.
To compare the overall mineral gain between groups, a dependent -test was applied. The intergroup comparisons were made using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test for pairwise comparisons for both penetration depth and mineral gain. The significance level was set to P ≤ 0.05.
The mineral gain in enamel was not statistically different between nHA and nanosilica infiltrants ( = 0.9950). nHA infiltrated dentin showed significantly more mineral gain ( = 0.0001) than nanosilica infiltrant. The depth of penetration of the nHA in enamel was statistically greater than that of nanosilica, but in dentin, the difference was not significant.
nHA infiltrant performed better in mineral gain, and penetrated deeper into the demineralized erosive lesions, compared to nanosilica infiltrant in both enamel and dentin. The highest mineral precipitation and deeper penetration into both demineralized enamel and dentin was observed with nHA infiltrant compared to (as against) nanosilica infiltrant.
评估并比较羟基磷灰石和二氧化硅纳米颗粒渗入人工制造的釉质和牙本质侵蚀性病变后的矿物质增加量及渗透深度。
将60颗拔除的人类磨牙进行切片,以获取釉质和牙本质样本(各60个)。分别使用柠檬酸和甲酸对它们进行脱矿处理,以在釉质和牙本质表面制造侵蚀性病变。根据所用的渗透剂,将样本分为纳米羟基磷灰石(nHA)组或纳米二氧化硅组(各30个)。每组中一半的釉质和牙本质样本(各15个)在侵蚀攻击后分析矿物质损失情况,在施加渗透剂后分析矿物质增加量,采用能量色散X射线光谱法。在另一半的釉质和牙本质样本(各15个)中,使用共聚焦显微镜分析纳米渗透剂的渗透深度。
为比较各组之间的总体矿物质增加量,应用了配对t检验。组间比较采用单因素方差分析,随后进行Tukey检验以对渗透深度和矿物质增加量进行两两比较。显著性水平设定为P≤0.05。
nHA和纳米二氧化硅渗透剂在釉质中的矿物质增加量在统计学上无差异(P = 组间比较的P值,此处原文有误,推测应为P = 0.9950)。nHA渗入的牙本质显示出比纳米二氧化硅渗透剂显著更多的矿物质增加量(P = 0.0001)。nHA在釉质中的渗透深度在统计学上大于纳米二氧化硅,但在牙本质中差异不显著。
与纳米二氧化硅渗透剂相比,nHA渗透剂在矿物质增加方面表现更好,并且能更深地渗入脱矿的侵蚀性病变中。与纳米二氧化硅渗透剂相比,nHA渗透剂在脱矿的釉质和牙本质中均观察到最高的矿物质沉淀和更深的渗透。