Tucker Matthew A, Idrissi Ali, Almeida Diogo
Language, Mind and Brain Lab, Division of Science, Psychology Program, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Amazon.com, Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 21;11:586464. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.586464. eCollection 2020.
Previous work on the comprehension of agreement has shown that incorrectly inflected verbs do not trigger responses typically seen with fully ungrammatical verbs when the preceding sentential context furnishes a possibly matching distractor noun (i.e., agreement attraction). We report eight studies, three being direct replications, designed to assess the degree of similarity of these errors in the comprehension of subject-verb agreement along the dimensions of grammatical gender and number in Modern Standard Arabic. A meta-analysis of the results demonstrate the presence of agreement attraction effects in reading comprehension for gender and number on verbs. Moreover, the meta-analysis demonstrates that these two features do not behave identically: gender effects are larger and occur later relative to number attraction effects. These results challenge models of agreement that predict agreement features to be equipotent and show that real-time models of agreement require modifications in the form of cue-weighting in order to account for these differential results.
先前关于一致性理解的研究表明,当前一个句子语境提供了一个可能匹配的干扰名词时(即一致性吸引),词形变化错误的动词不会引发通常在完全不符合语法的动词中出现的反应。我们报告了八项研究,其中三项是直接复制研究,旨在评估现代标准阿拉伯语中主谓一致理解方面这些错误在语法性和数的维度上的相似程度。对结果的元分析表明,在阅读理解中,动词的性和数存在一致性吸引效应。此外,元分析表明这两个特征的表现并不相同:性效应更大,且相对于数吸引效应出现得更晚。这些结果对预测一致性特征具有同等效力的一致性模型提出了挑战,并表明一致性实时模型需要以线索加权的形式进行修改,以解释这些差异结果。